Cargando…

Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA

BACKGROUND: Promoting and maintaining health is critical to ruminant welfare and productivity. Within human medicine, faecal lactoferrin is quantified for routine assessment of various gastrointestinal illnesses avoiding the need for blood sampling. This approach might also be adapted and applied fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooke, Andrew S., Watt, Kathryn A., Albery, Greg F., Morgan, Eric R., Dungait, Jennifer A.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368415
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8631
_version_ 1783527588334927872
author Cooke, Andrew S.
Watt, Kathryn A.
Albery, Greg F.
Morgan, Eric R.
Dungait, Jennifer A.J.
author_facet Cooke, Andrew S.
Watt, Kathryn A.
Albery, Greg F.
Morgan, Eric R.
Dungait, Jennifer A.J.
author_sort Cooke, Andrew S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Promoting and maintaining health is critical to ruminant welfare and productivity. Within human medicine, faecal lactoferrin is quantified for routine assessment of various gastrointestinal illnesses avoiding the need for blood sampling. This approach might also be adapted and applied for non-invasive health assessments in animals. METHODS: In this proof-of-concept study, a bovine lactoferrin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), designed for serum and milk, was applied to a faecal supernatant to assess its potential for quantifying lactoferrin in the faeces of cattle. Faecal lactoferrin concentrations were compared to background levels to assess the viability of the technique. A comparison was then made against serum lactoferrin levels to determine if they were or were not reflective of one another. RESULTS: The optical densities of faecal samples were significantly greater than background readings, supporting the hypothesis that the assay was effective in quantifying faecal lactoferrin (T(13, 115) = 11.99, p < 0.0005). The mean faecal lactoferrin concentration was 0.269 µg mL(−1) (S.E. 0.031) and the mean serum concentration 0.074 µg mL(−1) (S.E. 0.005). Lactoferrin concentrations of faecal and serum samples, taken from the same animals on the same day, were significantly different (T(21) = 2.20, p = 0.039) and did not correlate (r = 0.2699, p = 0.238). CONCLUSION: Results support the hypothesis that lactoferrin can be quantified in cattle faeces by ELISA. Whilst further research is required to determine the physiological source of the lactoferrin, this highlights the potential of the method for non-invasive assessment of cattle immunology and pathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7189889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71898892020-05-04 Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA Cooke, Andrew S. Watt, Kathryn A. Albery, Greg F. Morgan, Eric R. Dungait, Jennifer A.J. PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: Promoting and maintaining health is critical to ruminant welfare and productivity. Within human medicine, faecal lactoferrin is quantified for routine assessment of various gastrointestinal illnesses avoiding the need for blood sampling. This approach might also be adapted and applied for non-invasive health assessments in animals. METHODS: In this proof-of-concept study, a bovine lactoferrin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), designed for serum and milk, was applied to a faecal supernatant to assess its potential for quantifying lactoferrin in the faeces of cattle. Faecal lactoferrin concentrations were compared to background levels to assess the viability of the technique. A comparison was then made against serum lactoferrin levels to determine if they were or were not reflective of one another. RESULTS: The optical densities of faecal samples were significantly greater than background readings, supporting the hypothesis that the assay was effective in quantifying faecal lactoferrin (T(13, 115) = 11.99, p < 0.0005). The mean faecal lactoferrin concentration was 0.269 µg mL(−1) (S.E. 0.031) and the mean serum concentration 0.074 µg mL(−1) (S.E. 0.005). Lactoferrin concentrations of faecal and serum samples, taken from the same animals on the same day, were significantly different (T(21) = 2.20, p = 0.039) and did not correlate (r = 0.2699, p = 0.238). CONCLUSION: Results support the hypothesis that lactoferrin can be quantified in cattle faeces by ELISA. Whilst further research is required to determine the physiological source of the lactoferrin, this highlights the potential of the method for non-invasive assessment of cattle immunology and pathology. PeerJ Inc. 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7189889/ /pubmed/32368415 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8631 Text en © 2020 Cooke et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Cooke, Andrew S.
Watt, Kathryn A.
Albery, Greg F.
Morgan, Eric R.
Dungait, Jennifer A.J.
Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA
title Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA
title_full Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA
title_fullStr Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA
title_full_unstemmed Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA
title_short Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA
title_sort lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by elisa
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368415
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8631
work_keys_str_mv AT cookeandrews lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa
AT wattkathryna lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa
AT alberygregf lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa
AT morganericr lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa
AT dungaitjenniferaj lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa