Cargando…
Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA
BACKGROUND: Promoting and maintaining health is critical to ruminant welfare and productivity. Within human medicine, faecal lactoferrin is quantified for routine assessment of various gastrointestinal illnesses avoiding the need for blood sampling. This approach might also be adapted and applied fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368415 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8631 |
_version_ | 1783527588334927872 |
---|---|
author | Cooke, Andrew S. Watt, Kathryn A. Albery, Greg F. Morgan, Eric R. Dungait, Jennifer A.J. |
author_facet | Cooke, Andrew S. Watt, Kathryn A. Albery, Greg F. Morgan, Eric R. Dungait, Jennifer A.J. |
author_sort | Cooke, Andrew S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Promoting and maintaining health is critical to ruminant welfare and productivity. Within human medicine, faecal lactoferrin is quantified for routine assessment of various gastrointestinal illnesses avoiding the need for blood sampling. This approach might also be adapted and applied for non-invasive health assessments in animals. METHODS: In this proof-of-concept study, a bovine lactoferrin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), designed for serum and milk, was applied to a faecal supernatant to assess its potential for quantifying lactoferrin in the faeces of cattle. Faecal lactoferrin concentrations were compared to background levels to assess the viability of the technique. A comparison was then made against serum lactoferrin levels to determine if they were or were not reflective of one another. RESULTS: The optical densities of faecal samples were significantly greater than background readings, supporting the hypothesis that the assay was effective in quantifying faecal lactoferrin (T(13, 115) = 11.99, p < 0.0005). The mean faecal lactoferrin concentration was 0.269 µg mL(−1) (S.E. 0.031) and the mean serum concentration 0.074 µg mL(−1) (S.E. 0.005). Lactoferrin concentrations of faecal and serum samples, taken from the same animals on the same day, were significantly different (T(21) = 2.20, p = 0.039) and did not correlate (r = 0.2699, p = 0.238). CONCLUSION: Results support the hypothesis that lactoferrin can be quantified in cattle faeces by ELISA. Whilst further research is required to determine the physiological source of the lactoferrin, this highlights the potential of the method for non-invasive assessment of cattle immunology and pathology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7189889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71898892020-05-04 Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA Cooke, Andrew S. Watt, Kathryn A. Albery, Greg F. Morgan, Eric R. Dungait, Jennifer A.J. PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: Promoting and maintaining health is critical to ruminant welfare and productivity. Within human medicine, faecal lactoferrin is quantified for routine assessment of various gastrointestinal illnesses avoiding the need for blood sampling. This approach might also be adapted and applied for non-invasive health assessments in animals. METHODS: In this proof-of-concept study, a bovine lactoferrin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), designed for serum and milk, was applied to a faecal supernatant to assess its potential for quantifying lactoferrin in the faeces of cattle. Faecal lactoferrin concentrations were compared to background levels to assess the viability of the technique. A comparison was then made against serum lactoferrin levels to determine if they were or were not reflective of one another. RESULTS: The optical densities of faecal samples were significantly greater than background readings, supporting the hypothesis that the assay was effective in quantifying faecal lactoferrin (T(13, 115) = 11.99, p < 0.0005). The mean faecal lactoferrin concentration was 0.269 µg mL(−1) (S.E. 0.031) and the mean serum concentration 0.074 µg mL(−1) (S.E. 0.005). Lactoferrin concentrations of faecal and serum samples, taken from the same animals on the same day, were significantly different (T(21) = 2.20, p = 0.039) and did not correlate (r = 0.2699, p = 0.238). CONCLUSION: Results support the hypothesis that lactoferrin can be quantified in cattle faeces by ELISA. Whilst further research is required to determine the physiological source of the lactoferrin, this highlights the potential of the method for non-invasive assessment of cattle immunology and pathology. PeerJ Inc. 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7189889/ /pubmed/32368415 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8631 Text en © 2020 Cooke et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Agricultural Science Cooke, Andrew S. Watt, Kathryn A. Albery, Greg F. Morgan, Eric R. Dungait, Jennifer A.J. Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA |
title | Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA |
title_full | Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA |
title_fullStr | Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA |
title_full_unstemmed | Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA |
title_short | Lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by ELISA |
title_sort | lactoferrin quantification in cattle faeces by elisa |
topic | Agricultural Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368415 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cookeandrews lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa AT wattkathryna lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa AT alberygregf lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa AT morganericr lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa AT dungaitjenniferaj lactoferrinquantificationincattlefaecesbyelisa |