Cargando…

Q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of the superstition that utterance of the word “quiet” in a clinical setting increases workload. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority study. SETTING: Microbiology department of a large teaching hospital in Lancashire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Two me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brookfield, Charlotte R, Phillips, Patrick P J, Shorten, Robert J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6446
_version_ 1783527606739533824
author Brookfield, Charlotte R
Phillips, Patrick P J
Shorten, Robert J
author_facet Brookfield, Charlotte R
Phillips, Patrick P J
Shorten, Robert J
author_sort Brookfield, Charlotte R
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of the superstition that utterance of the word “quiet” in a clinical setting increases workload. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority study. SETTING: Microbiology department of a large teaching hospital in Lancashire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Two members of the medical microbiology team carried out the duty work on any given week day and an on-call team member on any weekend day. 29 days were assigned in which staff were to say “Today will be a quiet day” and 32 days were assigned in which staff were to refrain from saying the word “quiet” in any context. INTERVENTIONS: Each day was randomly allocated to either saying “Today will be a quiet day” (intervention group) or refraining from saying the word “quiet” (control group) in any context. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean overall workload: a composite of number of clinically related telephone calls, clinically significant results, or validated results processed by the duty medical microbiology team during a 24 hour period referred to collectively as “clinical episodes.” A difference of 30 clinical episodes was considered as the margin of non-inferiority. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome. RESULTS: Workload was measured each day over a 61 day period (1 May to 30 June 2019). A mean 139.0 clinical episodes occurred on control days compared with 144.9 on days when the experimental intervention was uttered, a difference of 5.9 (95% confidence interval−12.9 to 24.7). The upper bound was less than the specified margin of 30, providing evidence for non-inferiority. No evidence of a difference in workload was found between interventions with any of the four components, whether considering unadjusted or adjusted analyses, or looking at the subgroups of week days or weekends. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings refute the long held superstition that utterance of the word “quiet” impacts on clinical workload, and therefore it should not be avoided. In the era of considerable staff shortages and increased work related stress, doctors should look to other methods to increase resilience and protect their wellbeing and mental health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s research department SE-259.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7190014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71900142020-05-01 Q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial Brookfield, Charlotte R Phillips, Patrick P J Shorten, Robert J BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of the superstition that utterance of the word “quiet” in a clinical setting increases workload. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority study. SETTING: Microbiology department of a large teaching hospital in Lancashire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Two members of the medical microbiology team carried out the duty work on any given week day and an on-call team member on any weekend day. 29 days were assigned in which staff were to say “Today will be a quiet day” and 32 days were assigned in which staff were to refrain from saying the word “quiet” in any context. INTERVENTIONS: Each day was randomly allocated to either saying “Today will be a quiet day” (intervention group) or refraining from saying the word “quiet” (control group) in any context. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean overall workload: a composite of number of clinically related telephone calls, clinically significant results, or validated results processed by the duty medical microbiology team during a 24 hour period referred to collectively as “clinical episodes.” A difference of 30 clinical episodes was considered as the margin of non-inferiority. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome. RESULTS: Workload was measured each day over a 61 day period (1 May to 30 June 2019). A mean 139.0 clinical episodes occurred on control days compared with 144.9 on days when the experimental intervention was uttered, a difference of 5.9 (95% confidence interval−12.9 to 24.7). The upper bound was less than the specified margin of 30, providing evidence for non-inferiority. No evidence of a difference in workload was found between interventions with any of the four components, whether considering unadjusted or adjusted analyses, or looking at the subgroups of week days or weekends. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings refute the long held superstition that utterance of the word “quiet” impacts on clinical workload, and therefore it should not be avoided. In the era of considerable staff shortages and increased work related stress, doctors should look to other methods to increase resilience and protect their wellbeing and mental health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s research department SE-259. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7190014/ /pubmed/31852676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6446 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Brookfield, Charlotte R
Phillips, Patrick P J
Shorten, Robert J
Q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title Q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_full Q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_short Q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
title_sort q fever—the superstition of avoiding the word “quiet” as a coping mechanism: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31852676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6446
work_keys_str_mv AT brookfieldcharlotter qfeverthesuperstitionofavoidingthewordquietasacopingmechanismrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT phillipspatrickpj qfeverthesuperstitionofavoidingthewordquietasacopingmechanismrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT shortenrobertj qfeverthesuperstitionofavoidingthewordquietasacopingmechanismrandomisedcontrollednoninferioritytrial