Cargando…
International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability
OBJECTIVE: To review the main instruments of functional assessment and health status cited in the literature to evaluate Brazilian workers and verify the compatibility of their items with the core set for professional rehabilitation. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted in the main data...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32491090 http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463 |
_version_ | 1783527621587369984 |
---|---|
author | Luna, Juliana Scholtão Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego Koifman, Rosalina Jorge Bergmann, Anke |
author_facet | Luna, Juliana Scholtão Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego Koifman, Rosalina Jorge Bergmann, Anke |
author_sort | Luna, Juliana Scholtão |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To review the main instruments of functional assessment and health status cited in the literature to evaluate Brazilian workers and verify the compatibility of their items with the core set for professional rehabilitation. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted in the main databases in search of articles that used assessment instruments in populations of workers between 2007 and 2017. Subsequently, the contents of the identified instruments were retrieved, and two evaluators analyzed their items to verify the compatibility with the categories of the core set of the International Classification of Functioning for professional rehabilitation. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement between the evaluators. RESULTS: Five specific and eight generic instruments were selected to evaluate the functioning of workers. The analysis of the items of the total instruments allowed the definition of 58 categories (64.5%) of the core set with minimal overlap: 13 (76.5%) of the body functions component, 29 (72.5%) of the activities and participation component and 16 (49%) environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: The association of several instruments requires time and makes it difficult to use the classification. The development of instruments with direct association with its categories is essential to operationalize it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7190096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71900962020-05-18 International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability Luna, Juliana Scholtão Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego Koifman, Rosalina Jorge Bergmann, Anke Rev Saude Publica Review OBJECTIVE: To review the main instruments of functional assessment and health status cited in the literature to evaluate Brazilian workers and verify the compatibility of their items with the core set for professional rehabilitation. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted in the main databases in search of articles that used assessment instruments in populations of workers between 2007 and 2017. Subsequently, the contents of the identified instruments were retrieved, and two evaluators analyzed their items to verify the compatibility with the categories of the core set of the International Classification of Functioning for professional rehabilitation. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement between the evaluators. RESULTS: Five specific and eight generic instruments were selected to evaluate the functioning of workers. The analysis of the items of the total instruments allowed the definition of 58 categories (64.5%) of the core set with minimal overlap: 13 (76.5%) of the body functions component, 29 (72.5%) of the activities and participation component and 16 (49%) environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: The association of several instruments requires time and makes it difficult to use the classification. The development of instruments with direct association with its categories is essential to operationalize it. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7190096/ /pubmed/32491090 http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Luna, Juliana Scholtão Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego Koifman, Rosalina Jorge Bergmann, Anke International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability |
title | International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability |
title_full | International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability |
title_fullStr | International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability |
title_full_unstemmed | International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability |
title_short | International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability |
title_sort | international classification of functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32491090 http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lunajulianascholtao internationalclassificationoffunctioninginprofessionalrehabilitationinstrumentsforassessingworkdisability AT monteiroginatorresrego internationalclassificationoffunctioninginprofessionalrehabilitationinstrumentsforassessingworkdisability AT koifmanrosalinajorge internationalclassificationoffunctioninginprofessionalrehabilitationinstrumentsforassessingworkdisability AT bergmannanke internationalclassificationoffunctioninginprofessionalrehabilitationinstrumentsforassessingworkdisability |