Cargando…

International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability

OBJECTIVE: To review the main instruments of functional assessment and health status cited in the literature to evaluate Brazilian workers and verify the compatibility of their items with the core set for professional rehabilitation. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted in the main data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luna, Juliana Scholtão, Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego, Koifman, Rosalina Jorge, Bergmann, Anke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32491090
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463
_version_ 1783527621587369984
author Luna, Juliana Scholtão
Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego
Koifman, Rosalina Jorge
Bergmann, Anke
author_facet Luna, Juliana Scholtão
Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego
Koifman, Rosalina Jorge
Bergmann, Anke
author_sort Luna, Juliana Scholtão
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To review the main instruments of functional assessment and health status cited in the literature to evaluate Brazilian workers and verify the compatibility of their items with the core set for professional rehabilitation. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted in the main databases in search of articles that used assessment instruments in populations of workers between 2007 and 2017. Subsequently, the contents of the identified instruments were retrieved, and two evaluators analyzed their items to verify the compatibility with the categories of the core set of the International Classification of Functioning for professional rehabilitation. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement between the evaluators. RESULTS: Five specific and eight generic instruments were selected to evaluate the functioning of workers. The analysis of the items of the total instruments allowed the definition of 58 categories (64.5%) of the core set with minimal overlap: 13 (76.5%) of the body functions component, 29 (72.5%) of the activities and participation component and 16 (49%) environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: The association of several instruments requires time and makes it difficult to use the classification. The development of instruments with direct association with its categories is essential to operationalize it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7190096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71900962020-05-18 International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability Luna, Juliana Scholtão Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego Koifman, Rosalina Jorge Bergmann, Anke Rev Saude Publica Review OBJECTIVE: To review the main instruments of functional assessment and health status cited in the literature to evaluate Brazilian workers and verify the compatibility of their items with the core set for professional rehabilitation. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted in the main databases in search of articles that used assessment instruments in populations of workers between 2007 and 2017. Subsequently, the contents of the identified instruments were retrieved, and two evaluators analyzed their items to verify the compatibility with the categories of the core set of the International Classification of Functioning for professional rehabilitation. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement between the evaluators. RESULTS: Five specific and eight generic instruments were selected to evaluate the functioning of workers. The analysis of the items of the total instruments allowed the definition of 58 categories (64.5%) of the core set with minimal overlap: 13 (76.5%) of the body functions component, 29 (72.5%) of the activities and participation component and 16 (49%) environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS: The association of several instruments requires time and makes it difficult to use the classification. The development of instruments with direct association with its categories is essential to operationalize it. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7190096/ /pubmed/32491090 http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Luna, Juliana Scholtão
Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego
Koifman, Rosalina Jorge
Bergmann, Anke
International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability
title International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability
title_full International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability
title_fullStr International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability
title_full_unstemmed International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability
title_short International Classification of Functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability
title_sort international classification of functioning in professional rehabilitation: instruments for assessing work disability
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32491090
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001463
work_keys_str_mv AT lunajulianascholtao internationalclassificationoffunctioninginprofessionalrehabilitationinstrumentsforassessingworkdisability
AT monteiroginatorresrego internationalclassificationoffunctioninginprofessionalrehabilitationinstrumentsforassessingworkdisability
AT koifmanrosalinajorge internationalclassificationoffunctioninginprofessionalrehabilitationinstrumentsforassessingworkdisability
AT bergmannanke internationalclassificationoffunctioninginprofessionalrehabilitationinstrumentsforassessingworkdisability