Cargando…
Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study
OBJECTIVES: Non-Cartesian Spiral readout can be implemented in 3D Time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) with short acquisition times. In this intra-individual comparison study we evaluated the clinical feasibility of Spiral TOF MRA in comparison with compressed sensing accelerated TOF MRA at 1.5...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232372 |
_version_ | 1783527637150334976 |
---|---|
author | Sartoretti, Thomas Sartoretti, Elisabeth Schwenk, Árpád van Smoorenburg, Luuk Mannil, Manoj Euler, André Becker, Anton S. Alfieri, Alex Najafi, Arash Binkert, Christoph A. Wyss, Michael Sartoretti-Schefer, Sabine |
author_facet | Sartoretti, Thomas Sartoretti, Elisabeth Schwenk, Árpád van Smoorenburg, Luuk Mannil, Manoj Euler, André Becker, Anton S. Alfieri, Alex Najafi, Arash Binkert, Christoph A. Wyss, Michael Sartoretti-Schefer, Sabine |
author_sort | Sartoretti, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Non-Cartesian Spiral readout can be implemented in 3D Time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) with short acquisition times. In this intra-individual comparison study we evaluated the clinical feasibility of Spiral TOF MRA in comparison with compressed sensing accelerated TOF MRA at 1.5T for intracranial vessel imaging as it has yet to be determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with suspected intracranial vascular disease were imaged with two Spiral 3D TOFs (Spiral, 0.82x0.82x1.2 mm(3), 01:32 min; Spiral 0.8, 0.8x0.8x0.8 mm(3,) 02:12 min) and a Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D TOF (CS 3.5, 0.82x0.82x1.2 mm(3), 03:06 min) at 1.5T. Two neuroradiologists assessed qualitative (visualization of central and peripheral vessels) and quantitative image quality (Contrast Ratio, CR) and performed lesion and variation assessment for all three TOFs in each patient. After the rating process, the readers were questioned and representative cases were reinspected in a non-blinded fashion. For statistical analysis, the Friedman and Nemenyi post-hoc test, Kendall W tests, repeated measure ANOVA and weighted Cohen's Kappa tests were used. RESULTS: The Spiral and Spiral 0.8 outperformed the CS 3.5 in terms of peripheral image quality (p<0.001) and performed equally well in terms of central image quality (p>0.05). The readers noted slight differences in the appearance of maximum intensity projection images. A good to high degree of interstudy agreement between the three TOFs was observed for lesion and variation assessment (W = 0.638, p<0.001 –W = 1, p<0.001). CR values did not differ significantly between the three TOFs (p = 0.534). Interreader agreement ranged from good (K = 0.638) to excellent (K = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the CS 3.5, both the Spiral and Spiral 0.8 exhibited comparable or better image quality and comparable diagnostic performance at much shorter acquisition times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7190165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71901652020-05-06 Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study Sartoretti, Thomas Sartoretti, Elisabeth Schwenk, Árpád van Smoorenburg, Luuk Mannil, Manoj Euler, André Becker, Anton S. Alfieri, Alex Najafi, Arash Binkert, Christoph A. Wyss, Michael Sartoretti-Schefer, Sabine PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Non-Cartesian Spiral readout can be implemented in 3D Time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) with short acquisition times. In this intra-individual comparison study we evaluated the clinical feasibility of Spiral TOF MRA in comparison with compressed sensing accelerated TOF MRA at 1.5T for intracranial vessel imaging as it has yet to be determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with suspected intracranial vascular disease were imaged with two Spiral 3D TOFs (Spiral, 0.82x0.82x1.2 mm(3), 01:32 min; Spiral 0.8, 0.8x0.8x0.8 mm(3,) 02:12 min) and a Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D TOF (CS 3.5, 0.82x0.82x1.2 mm(3), 03:06 min) at 1.5T. Two neuroradiologists assessed qualitative (visualization of central and peripheral vessels) and quantitative image quality (Contrast Ratio, CR) and performed lesion and variation assessment for all three TOFs in each patient. After the rating process, the readers were questioned and representative cases were reinspected in a non-blinded fashion. For statistical analysis, the Friedman and Nemenyi post-hoc test, Kendall W tests, repeated measure ANOVA and weighted Cohen's Kappa tests were used. RESULTS: The Spiral and Spiral 0.8 outperformed the CS 3.5 in terms of peripheral image quality (p<0.001) and performed equally well in terms of central image quality (p>0.05). The readers noted slight differences in the appearance of maximum intensity projection images. A good to high degree of interstudy agreement between the three TOFs was observed for lesion and variation assessment (W = 0.638, p<0.001 –W = 1, p<0.001). CR values did not differ significantly between the three TOFs (p = 0.534). Interreader agreement ranged from good (K = 0.638) to excellent (K = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the CS 3.5, both the Spiral and Spiral 0.8 exhibited comparable or better image quality and comparable diagnostic performance at much shorter acquisition times. Public Library of Science 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7190165/ /pubmed/32348366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232372 Text en © 2020 Sartoretti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sartoretti, Thomas Sartoretti, Elisabeth Schwenk, Árpád van Smoorenburg, Luuk Mannil, Manoj Euler, André Becker, Anton S. Alfieri, Alex Najafi, Arash Binkert, Christoph A. Wyss, Michael Sartoretti-Schefer, Sabine Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study |
title | Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study |
title_full | Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study |
title_fullStr | Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study |
title_short | Clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-Cartesian spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography at 1.5T: An intra-individual comparison study |
title_sort | clinical feasibility of ultrafast intracranial vessel imaging with non-cartesian spiral 3d time-of-flight mr angiography at 1.5t: an intra-individual comparison study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sartorettithomas clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT sartorettielisabeth clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT schwenkarpad clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT vansmoorenburgluuk clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT mannilmanoj clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT eulerandre clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT beckerantons clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT alfierialex clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT najafiarash clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT binkertchristopha clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT wyssmichael clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy AT sartorettischefersabine clinicalfeasibilityofultrafastintracranialvesselimagingwithnoncartesianspiral3dtimeofflightmrangiographyat15tanintraindividualcomparisonstudy |