Cargando…
Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey
INTRODUCTION: Meaningful conversations about diagnostic errors require safety cultures where clinicians are comfortable discussing errors openly. However, clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors publicly and barriers to these discussions remain unexplored. We compared clinicians’ comfort disc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000259 |
_version_ | 1783527652023336960 |
---|---|
author | Grubenhoff, Joseph A. Ziniel, Sonja I. Cifra, Christina L. Singhal, Geeta McClead, Richard E. Singh, Hardeep |
author_facet | Grubenhoff, Joseph A. Ziniel, Sonja I. Cifra, Christina L. Singhal, Geeta McClead, Richard E. Singh, Hardeep |
author_sort | Grubenhoff, Joseph A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Meaningful conversations about diagnostic errors require safety cultures where clinicians are comfortable discussing errors openly. However, clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors publicly and barriers to these discussions remain unexplored. We compared clinicians’ comfort discussing diagnostic errors to other medical errors and identified barriers to open discussion. METHODS: Pediatric clinicians at 4 hospitals were surveyed between May and June 2018. The survey assessed respondents’ comfort discussing medical errors (with varying degrees of system versus individual clinician responsibility) during morbidity and mortality conferences and privately with peers. Respondents reported the most significant barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly. Poststratification weighting accounted for nonresponse bias; the Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment was applied to control for false discovery (significance set at P < 0.018). RESULTS: Clinicians (n = 838; response rate 22.6%) were significantly less comfortable discussing all error types during morbidity and mortality conferences than privately (P < 0.004) and significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with other medical errors (P < 0.018). Comfort did not differ by clinician type or years in practice; clinicians at one institution were significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with peers at other institutions. The most frequently cited barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly included feeling like a bad clinician, loss of reputation, and peer judgment of knowledge base and decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are more uncomfortable discussing diagnostic errors than other types of medical errors. The most frequent barriers involve the public perception of clinical performance. Addressing this aspect of safety culture may improve clinician participation in efforts to reduce harm from diagnostic errors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7190246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71902462020-05-18 Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey Grubenhoff, Joseph A. Ziniel, Sonja I. Cifra, Christina L. Singhal, Geeta McClead, Richard E. Singh, Hardeep Pediatr Qual Saf Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research INTRODUCTION: Meaningful conversations about diagnostic errors require safety cultures where clinicians are comfortable discussing errors openly. However, clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors publicly and barriers to these discussions remain unexplored. We compared clinicians’ comfort discussing diagnostic errors to other medical errors and identified barriers to open discussion. METHODS: Pediatric clinicians at 4 hospitals were surveyed between May and June 2018. The survey assessed respondents’ comfort discussing medical errors (with varying degrees of system versus individual clinician responsibility) during morbidity and mortality conferences and privately with peers. Respondents reported the most significant barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly. Poststratification weighting accounted for nonresponse bias; the Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment was applied to control for false discovery (significance set at P < 0.018). RESULTS: Clinicians (n = 838; response rate 22.6%) were significantly less comfortable discussing all error types during morbidity and mortality conferences than privately (P < 0.004) and significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with other medical errors (P < 0.018). Comfort did not differ by clinician type or years in practice; clinicians at one institution were significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with peers at other institutions. The most frequently cited barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly included feeling like a bad clinician, loss of reputation, and peer judgment of knowledge base and decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are more uncomfortable discussing diagnostic errors than other types of medical errors. The most frequent barriers involve the public perception of clinical performance. Addressing this aspect of safety culture may improve clinician participation in efforts to reduce harm from diagnostic errors. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7190246/ /pubmed/32426626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000259 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research Grubenhoff, Joseph A. Ziniel, Sonja I. Cifra, Christina L. Singhal, Geeta McClead, Richard E. Singh, Hardeep Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey |
title | Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey |
title_full | Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey |
title_fullStr | Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey |
title_short | Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey |
title_sort | pediatric clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors for improving patient safety: a survey |
topic | Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grubenhoffjosepha pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey AT zinielsonjai pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey AT cifrachristinal pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey AT singhalgeeta pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey AT mccleadricharde pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey AT singhhardeep pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey |