Cargando…

Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey

INTRODUCTION: Meaningful conversations about diagnostic errors require safety cultures where clinicians are comfortable discussing errors openly. However, clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors publicly and barriers to these discussions remain unexplored. We compared clinicians’ comfort disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grubenhoff, Joseph A., Ziniel, Sonja I., Cifra, Christina L., Singhal, Geeta, McClead, Richard E., Singh, Hardeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000259
_version_ 1783527652023336960
author Grubenhoff, Joseph A.
Ziniel, Sonja I.
Cifra, Christina L.
Singhal, Geeta
McClead, Richard E.
Singh, Hardeep
author_facet Grubenhoff, Joseph A.
Ziniel, Sonja I.
Cifra, Christina L.
Singhal, Geeta
McClead, Richard E.
Singh, Hardeep
author_sort Grubenhoff, Joseph A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Meaningful conversations about diagnostic errors require safety cultures where clinicians are comfortable discussing errors openly. However, clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors publicly and barriers to these discussions remain unexplored. We compared clinicians’ comfort discussing diagnostic errors to other medical errors and identified barriers to open discussion. METHODS: Pediatric clinicians at 4 hospitals were surveyed between May and June 2018. The survey assessed respondents’ comfort discussing medical errors (with varying degrees of system versus individual clinician responsibility) during morbidity and mortality conferences and privately with peers. Respondents reported the most significant barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly. Poststratification weighting accounted for nonresponse bias; the Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment was applied to control for false discovery (significance set at P < 0.018). RESULTS: Clinicians (n = 838; response rate 22.6%) were significantly less comfortable discussing all error types during morbidity and mortality conferences than privately (P < 0.004) and significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with other medical errors (P < 0.018). Comfort did not differ by clinician type or years in practice; clinicians at one institution were significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with peers at other institutions. The most frequently cited barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly included feeling like a bad clinician, loss of reputation, and peer judgment of knowledge base and decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are more uncomfortable discussing diagnostic errors than other types of medical errors. The most frequent barriers involve the public perception of clinical performance. Addressing this aspect of safety culture may improve clinician participation in efforts to reduce harm from diagnostic errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7190246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71902462020-05-18 Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey Grubenhoff, Joseph A. Ziniel, Sonja I. Cifra, Christina L. Singhal, Geeta McClead, Richard E. Singh, Hardeep Pediatr Qual Saf Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research INTRODUCTION: Meaningful conversations about diagnostic errors require safety cultures where clinicians are comfortable discussing errors openly. However, clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors publicly and barriers to these discussions remain unexplored. We compared clinicians’ comfort discussing diagnostic errors to other medical errors and identified barriers to open discussion. METHODS: Pediatric clinicians at 4 hospitals were surveyed between May and June 2018. The survey assessed respondents’ comfort discussing medical errors (with varying degrees of system versus individual clinician responsibility) during morbidity and mortality conferences and privately with peers. Respondents reported the most significant barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly. Poststratification weighting accounted for nonresponse bias; the Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment was applied to control for false discovery (significance set at P < 0.018). RESULTS: Clinicians (n = 838; response rate 22.6%) were significantly less comfortable discussing all error types during morbidity and mortality conferences than privately (P < 0.004) and significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with other medical errors (P < 0.018). Comfort did not differ by clinician type or years in practice; clinicians at one institution were significantly less comfortable discussing diagnostic errors compared with peers at other institutions. The most frequently cited barriers to discussing diagnostic errors publicly included feeling like a bad clinician, loss of reputation, and peer judgment of knowledge base and decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are more uncomfortable discussing diagnostic errors than other types of medical errors. The most frequent barriers involve the public perception of clinical performance. Addressing this aspect of safety culture may improve clinician participation in efforts to reduce harm from diagnostic errors. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7190246/ /pubmed/32426626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000259 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research
Grubenhoff, Joseph A.
Ziniel, Sonja I.
Cifra, Christina L.
Singhal, Geeta
McClead, Richard E.
Singh, Hardeep
Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey
title Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey
title_full Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey
title_fullStr Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey
title_full_unstemmed Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey
title_short Pediatric Clinician Comfort Discussing Diagnostic Errors for Improving Patient Safety: A Survey
title_sort pediatric clinician comfort discussing diagnostic errors for improving patient safety: a survey
topic Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000259
work_keys_str_mv AT grubenhoffjosepha pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey
AT zinielsonjai pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey
AT cifrachristinal pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey
AT singhalgeeta pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey
AT mccleadricharde pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey
AT singhhardeep pediatriccliniciancomfortdiscussingdiagnosticerrorsforimprovingpatientsafetyasurvey