Cargando…
How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time?
OBJECTIVES: Dental implant treatment (DIT) improves peoples’ oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL). Assessment of longitudinal changes in OHRQoL may be undermined by response shift (RS). RS is the process by which quality of life changes, independent of health status as a result recalibration,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02408-1 |
_version_ | 1783527711995592704 |
---|---|
author | Machuca, Carolina Vettore, Mario V. Robinson, Peter G. |
author_facet | Machuca, Carolina Vettore, Mario V. Robinson, Peter G. |
author_sort | Machuca, Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Dental implant treatment (DIT) improves peoples’ oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL). Assessment of longitudinal changes in OHRQoL may be undermined by response shift (RS). RS is the process by which quality of life changes, independent of health status as a result recalibration, reprioritization or reconceptualization. Thus, this study aimed to describe RS in the OHRQoL and perceived oral health of individuals receiving DIT and to compare the then-test, a self-anchored scale and the classification and regression trees (CRT) approaches for assessing RS. METHODS: OHRQoL was assessed in 100 patients receiving DIT using the OHIP-Edent (n = 100) and a self-anchored scale (n = 45) before placement of the final restoration and 3 to 6 months after treatment was completed. The OHIP-Edent was also used as a retrospective assessment at follow-up. CRT examined changes in the OHIP-Edent total score as a dependent variable with global changes in oral health and each OHIP-Edent subscale score as independent variables. RESULTS: OHRQoL and perceived oral health improved after treatment. The OHIP-Edent score decreased from 36.4 at baseline to 12.7 after treatment. On average, participants recalibrated their internal standard downwards (− 4.0 OHIP-Edent points). CRT detected downwards recalibration in 5% of participants and upwards in 15%. Reprioritization was observed in the social disability and psychological discomfort aspects of OHRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: RS affects longitudinal assessments of OHRQoL in DIT, reducing the apparent magnitude of change. The then-test and CRT are valid and complementary methods to assess RS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02408-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7190585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71905852020-05-04 How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time? Machuca, Carolina Vettore, Mario V. Robinson, Peter G. Qual Life Res Article OBJECTIVES: Dental implant treatment (DIT) improves peoples’ oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL). Assessment of longitudinal changes in OHRQoL may be undermined by response shift (RS). RS is the process by which quality of life changes, independent of health status as a result recalibration, reprioritization or reconceptualization. Thus, this study aimed to describe RS in the OHRQoL and perceived oral health of individuals receiving DIT and to compare the then-test, a self-anchored scale and the classification and regression trees (CRT) approaches for assessing RS. METHODS: OHRQoL was assessed in 100 patients receiving DIT using the OHIP-Edent (n = 100) and a self-anchored scale (n = 45) before placement of the final restoration and 3 to 6 months after treatment was completed. The OHIP-Edent was also used as a retrospective assessment at follow-up. CRT examined changes in the OHIP-Edent total score as a dependent variable with global changes in oral health and each OHIP-Edent subscale score as independent variables. RESULTS: OHRQoL and perceived oral health improved after treatment. The OHIP-Edent score decreased from 36.4 at baseline to 12.7 after treatment. On average, participants recalibrated their internal standard downwards (− 4.0 OHIP-Edent points). CRT detected downwards recalibration in 5% of participants and upwards in 15%. Reprioritization was observed in the social disability and psychological discomfort aspects of OHRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: RS affects longitudinal assessments of OHRQoL in DIT, reducing the apparent magnitude of change. The then-test and CRT are valid and complementary methods to assess RS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02408-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7190585/ /pubmed/31907871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02408-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Machuca, Carolina Vettore, Mario V. Robinson, Peter G. How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time? |
title | How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time? |
title_full | How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time? |
title_fullStr | How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time? |
title_full_unstemmed | How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time? |
title_short | How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time? |
title_sort | how peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02408-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT machucacarolina howpeoplesratingsofdentalimplanttreatmentchangeovertime AT vettoremariov howpeoplesratingsofdentalimplanttreatmentchangeovertime AT robinsonpeterg howpeoplesratingsofdentalimplanttreatmentchangeovertime |