Cargando…

The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing

PURPOSE: The effect of open release of a post-traumatic elbow contracture on the stability of the joint has not been so far studied in vivo. Resection of elbow joint capsule, the key element of surgery, was reported to have no effect on the stability of cadaveric elbows. The joint capsule is yet kno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podgórski, Andrzej P., Kordasiewicz, Bartłomiej, Pomianowski, Stanisław
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04494-0
_version_ 1783527712698138624
author Podgórski, Andrzej P.
Kordasiewicz, Bartłomiej
Pomianowski, Stanisław
author_facet Podgórski, Andrzej P.
Kordasiewicz, Bartłomiej
Pomianowski, Stanisław
author_sort Podgórski, Andrzej P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The effect of open release of a post-traumatic elbow contracture on the stability of the joint has not been so far studied in vivo. Resection of elbow joint capsule, the key element of surgery, was reported to have no effect on the stability of cadaveric elbows. The joint capsule is yet known to participate in maintaining elbow stability as one of secondary stabilizers. METHODS: We assessed elbow joint laxity in 39 patients who underwent an open contracture release via the ‘column procedure’ described by B. Morrey and P. Mansat within the preceeding three to nine months. The measurements were taken with an apparatus designed particularly for this experiment according to the predetermined protocol. A preliminary part of the experiment showed that there was no significant difference between laxity of two elbow joints in healthy volunteers. Laxity of the operated elbows could be then compared with the contralateral joints. RESULTS: Mean absolute difference of laxity between healthy and operated elbows was 1.55° (0.1°–4.1°, SD = 1.1) being significantly lower than 2°, p = 0.0056. The difference of the joint laxity between the operated and healthy elbows did not differ statistically significantly by more than 0.6° from the difference of the laxity of two healthy elbows and, therefore, is not clinically noticeable. CONCLUSIONS: Our experiment confirmed that the ‘column procedure’ is a safe procedure which does not compromise the stability of the elbow joint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7190588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71905882020-05-04 The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing Podgórski, Andrzej P. Kordasiewicz, Bartłomiej Pomianowski, Stanisław Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: The effect of open release of a post-traumatic elbow contracture on the stability of the joint has not been so far studied in vivo. Resection of elbow joint capsule, the key element of surgery, was reported to have no effect on the stability of cadaveric elbows. The joint capsule is yet known to participate in maintaining elbow stability as one of secondary stabilizers. METHODS: We assessed elbow joint laxity in 39 patients who underwent an open contracture release via the ‘column procedure’ described by B. Morrey and P. Mansat within the preceeding three to nine months. The measurements were taken with an apparatus designed particularly for this experiment according to the predetermined protocol. A preliminary part of the experiment showed that there was no significant difference between laxity of two elbow joints in healthy volunteers. Laxity of the operated elbows could be then compared with the contralateral joints. RESULTS: Mean absolute difference of laxity between healthy and operated elbows was 1.55° (0.1°–4.1°, SD = 1.1) being significantly lower than 2°, p = 0.0056. The difference of the joint laxity between the operated and healthy elbows did not differ statistically significantly by more than 0.6° from the difference of the laxity of two healthy elbows and, therefore, is not clinically noticeable. CONCLUSIONS: Our experiment confirmed that the ‘column procedure’ is a safe procedure which does not compromise the stability of the elbow joint. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-12 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7190588/ /pubmed/32047962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04494-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Podgórski, Andrzej P.
Kordasiewicz, Bartłomiej
Pomianowski, Stanisław
The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing
title The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing
title_full The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing
title_fullStr The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing
title_full_unstemmed The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing
title_short The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing
title_sort column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04494-0
work_keys_str_mv AT podgorskiandrzejp thecolumnprocedurepreserveselbowstabilityonbiomechanicaltesting
AT kordasiewiczbartłomiej thecolumnprocedurepreserveselbowstabilityonbiomechanicaltesting
AT pomianowskistanisław thecolumnprocedurepreserveselbowstabilityonbiomechanicaltesting
AT podgorskiandrzejp columnprocedurepreserveselbowstabilityonbiomechanicaltesting
AT kordasiewiczbartłomiej columnprocedurepreserveselbowstabilityonbiomechanicaltesting
AT pomianowskistanisław columnprocedurepreserveselbowstabilityonbiomechanicaltesting