Cargando…

A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship?

Demographic change is supposed to be the most important indirect driver for changing biodiversity. In this article, a systematic review of 148 studies was conducted to examine the scientific evidence for this relationship and to identify potential gaps in research. We explored the spatial distributi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehring, Marion, Mehlhaus, Nicolai, Ott, Edward, Hummel, Diana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w
_version_ 1783527716468817920
author Mehring, Marion
Mehlhaus, Nicolai
Ott, Edward
Hummel, Diana
author_facet Mehring, Marion
Mehlhaus, Nicolai
Ott, Edward
Hummel, Diana
author_sort Mehring, Marion
collection PubMed
description Demographic change is supposed to be the most important indirect driver for changing biodiversity. In this article, a systematic review of 148 studies was conducted to examine the scientific evidence for this relationship and to identify potential gaps in research. We explored the spatial distribution of studies, the categories addressed with respect to biodiversity and demographic change, and the ways in which their relationships were conceptualised (spatially and temporally) and valued. The majority of studies were carried out in Africa, Europe and North America. Our analysis confirms the trend that demographic phenomena were mostly found to negatively influence biodiversity. However, a considerable number of studies also point towards impacts that were context dependent, either positive or negative under certain circumstances. In addition to that we identified significant gaps in research. In particular, there is a lack of addressing (1) other demographic aspects such as population decline, age structure or gender differences, (2) spatial variability of, e.g. human population growth, (3) long-term effects of demographic processes, and (4) the context dependency (e.g. regulations/law enforcement, type of human activities, and choice of scale or proxy). We conclude there is evidence that the relationship between biodiversity and demographic change is much more complex than expected and so far represented in research. Thus, we call for a social–ecological biodiversity research that particularly focusses on the functional relation between biodiversity and human activities, namely the different types, context, and interdependent dynamics (spatial and temporal) of this complex relation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7190604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71906042020-05-04 A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship? Mehring, Marion Mehlhaus, Nicolai Ott, Edward Hummel, Diana Ambio Review Demographic change is supposed to be the most important indirect driver for changing biodiversity. In this article, a systematic review of 148 studies was conducted to examine the scientific evidence for this relationship and to identify potential gaps in research. We explored the spatial distribution of studies, the categories addressed with respect to biodiversity and demographic change, and the ways in which their relationships were conceptualised (spatially and temporally) and valued. The majority of studies were carried out in Africa, Europe and North America. Our analysis confirms the trend that demographic phenomena were mostly found to negatively influence biodiversity. However, a considerable number of studies also point towards impacts that were context dependent, either positive or negative under certain circumstances. In addition to that we identified significant gaps in research. In particular, there is a lack of addressing (1) other demographic aspects such as population decline, age structure or gender differences, (2) spatial variability of, e.g. human population growth, (3) long-term effects of demographic processes, and (4) the context dependency (e.g. regulations/law enforcement, type of human activities, and choice of scale or proxy). We conclude there is evidence that the relationship between biodiversity and demographic change is much more complex than expected and so far represented in research. Thus, we call for a social–ecological biodiversity research that particularly focusses on the functional relation between biodiversity and human activities, namely the different types, context, and interdependent dynamics (spatial and temporal) of this complex relation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. Springer Netherlands 2019-11-23 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7190604/ /pubmed/31760632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Mehring, Marion
Mehlhaus, Nicolai
Ott, Edward
Hummel, Diana
A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship?
title A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship?
title_full A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship?
title_fullStr A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship?
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship?
title_short A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship?
title_sort systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: a misinterpreted relationship?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mehringmarion asystematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship
AT mehlhausnicolai asystematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship
AT ottedward asystematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship
AT hummeldiana asystematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship
AT mehringmarion systematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship
AT mehlhausnicolai systematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship
AT ottedward systematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship
AT hummeldiana systematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship