Cargando…
A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship?
Demographic change is supposed to be the most important indirect driver for changing biodiversity. In this article, a systematic review of 148 studies was conducted to examine the scientific evidence for this relationship and to identify potential gaps in research. We explored the spatial distributi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w |
_version_ | 1783527716468817920 |
---|---|
author | Mehring, Marion Mehlhaus, Nicolai Ott, Edward Hummel, Diana |
author_facet | Mehring, Marion Mehlhaus, Nicolai Ott, Edward Hummel, Diana |
author_sort | Mehring, Marion |
collection | PubMed |
description | Demographic change is supposed to be the most important indirect driver for changing biodiversity. In this article, a systematic review of 148 studies was conducted to examine the scientific evidence for this relationship and to identify potential gaps in research. We explored the spatial distribution of studies, the categories addressed with respect to biodiversity and demographic change, and the ways in which their relationships were conceptualised (spatially and temporally) and valued. The majority of studies were carried out in Africa, Europe and North America. Our analysis confirms the trend that demographic phenomena were mostly found to negatively influence biodiversity. However, a considerable number of studies also point towards impacts that were context dependent, either positive or negative under certain circumstances. In addition to that we identified significant gaps in research. In particular, there is a lack of addressing (1) other demographic aspects such as population decline, age structure or gender differences, (2) spatial variability of, e.g. human population growth, (3) long-term effects of demographic processes, and (4) the context dependency (e.g. regulations/law enforcement, type of human activities, and choice of scale or proxy). We conclude there is evidence that the relationship between biodiversity and demographic change is much more complex than expected and so far represented in research. Thus, we call for a social–ecological biodiversity research that particularly focusses on the functional relation between biodiversity and human activities, namely the different types, context, and interdependent dynamics (spatial and temporal) of this complex relation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7190604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71906042020-05-04 A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship? Mehring, Marion Mehlhaus, Nicolai Ott, Edward Hummel, Diana Ambio Review Demographic change is supposed to be the most important indirect driver for changing biodiversity. In this article, a systematic review of 148 studies was conducted to examine the scientific evidence for this relationship and to identify potential gaps in research. We explored the spatial distribution of studies, the categories addressed with respect to biodiversity and demographic change, and the ways in which their relationships were conceptualised (spatially and temporally) and valued. The majority of studies were carried out in Africa, Europe and North America. Our analysis confirms the trend that demographic phenomena were mostly found to negatively influence biodiversity. However, a considerable number of studies also point towards impacts that were context dependent, either positive or negative under certain circumstances. In addition to that we identified significant gaps in research. In particular, there is a lack of addressing (1) other demographic aspects such as population decline, age structure or gender differences, (2) spatial variability of, e.g. human population growth, (3) long-term effects of demographic processes, and (4) the context dependency (e.g. regulations/law enforcement, type of human activities, and choice of scale or proxy). We conclude there is evidence that the relationship between biodiversity and demographic change is much more complex than expected and so far represented in research. Thus, we call for a social–ecological biodiversity research that particularly focusses on the functional relation between biodiversity and human activities, namely the different types, context, and interdependent dynamics (spatial and temporal) of this complex relation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users. Springer Netherlands 2019-11-23 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7190604/ /pubmed/31760632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Mehring, Marion Mehlhaus, Nicolai Ott, Edward Hummel, Diana A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship? |
title | A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship? |
title_full | A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship? |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship? |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship? |
title_short | A systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: A misinterpreted relationship? |
title_sort | systematic review of biodiversity and demographic change: a misinterpreted relationship? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01276-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehringmarion asystematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship AT mehlhausnicolai asystematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship AT ottedward asystematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship AT hummeldiana asystematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship AT mehringmarion systematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship AT mehlhausnicolai systematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship AT ottedward systematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship AT hummeldiana systematicreviewofbiodiversityanddemographicchangeamisinterpretedrelationship |