Cargando…

Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls

Inhibition of return (IOR) is the reduction of detection speed and/or detection accuracy of a target in a recently attended location. This phenomenon, which has been discovered and studied thoroughly in humans, is believed to reflect a brain mechanism for controlling the allocation of spatial attent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lev-Ari, Tidhar, Zahar, Yael, Agarwal, Arpit, Gutfreund, Yoram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64197-9
_version_ 1783527729651515392
author Lev-Ari, Tidhar
Zahar, Yael
Agarwal, Arpit
Gutfreund, Yoram
author_facet Lev-Ari, Tidhar
Zahar, Yael
Agarwal, Arpit
Gutfreund, Yoram
author_sort Lev-Ari, Tidhar
collection PubMed
description Inhibition of return (IOR) is the reduction of detection speed and/or detection accuracy of a target in a recently attended location. This phenomenon, which has been discovered and studied thoroughly in humans, is believed to reflect a brain mechanism for controlling the allocation of spatial attention in a manner that enhances efficient search. Findings showing that IOR is robust, apparent at a very early age and seemingly dependent on midbrain activity suggest that IOR is a universal attentional mechanism in vertebrates. However, studies in non-mammalian species are scarce. To explore this hypothesis comparatively, we tested for IOR in barn owls (Tyto alba) using the classical Posner cueing paradigm. Two barn owls were trained to initiate a trial by fixating on the center of a computer screen and then turning their gaze to the location of a target. A short, non-informative cue appeared before the target, either at a location predicting the target (valid) or a location not predicting the target (invalid). In one barn owl, the response times (RT) to the valid targets compared to the invalid targets shifted from facilitation (lower RTs) to inhibition (higher RTs) when increasing the time lag between the cue and the target. The second owl mostly failed to maintain fixation and responded to the cue before the target onset. However, when including in the analysis only the trials in which the owl maintained fixation, an inhibition in the valid trials could be detected. To search for the neural correlates of IOR, we recorded multiunit responses in the optic tectum (OT) of four head-fixed owls passively viewing a cueing paradigm as in the behavioral experiments. At short cue to target lags (<100 ms), neural responses to the target in the receptive field (RF) were usually enhanced if the cue appeared earlier inside the RF (valid) and were suppressed if the cue appeared earlier outside the RF (invalid). This was reversed at longer lags: neural responses were suppressed in the valid conditions and were unaffected in the invalid conditions. The findings support the notion that IOR is a basic mechanism in the evolution of vertebrate behavior and suggest that the effect appears as a result of the interaction between lateral and forward inhibition in the tectal circuitry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7190666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71906662020-05-05 Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls Lev-Ari, Tidhar Zahar, Yael Agarwal, Arpit Gutfreund, Yoram Sci Rep Article Inhibition of return (IOR) is the reduction of detection speed and/or detection accuracy of a target in a recently attended location. This phenomenon, which has been discovered and studied thoroughly in humans, is believed to reflect a brain mechanism for controlling the allocation of spatial attention in a manner that enhances efficient search. Findings showing that IOR is robust, apparent at a very early age and seemingly dependent on midbrain activity suggest that IOR is a universal attentional mechanism in vertebrates. However, studies in non-mammalian species are scarce. To explore this hypothesis comparatively, we tested for IOR in barn owls (Tyto alba) using the classical Posner cueing paradigm. Two barn owls were trained to initiate a trial by fixating on the center of a computer screen and then turning their gaze to the location of a target. A short, non-informative cue appeared before the target, either at a location predicting the target (valid) or a location not predicting the target (invalid). In one barn owl, the response times (RT) to the valid targets compared to the invalid targets shifted from facilitation (lower RTs) to inhibition (higher RTs) when increasing the time lag between the cue and the target. The second owl mostly failed to maintain fixation and responded to the cue before the target onset. However, when including in the analysis only the trials in which the owl maintained fixation, an inhibition in the valid trials could be detected. To search for the neural correlates of IOR, we recorded multiunit responses in the optic tectum (OT) of four head-fixed owls passively viewing a cueing paradigm as in the behavioral experiments. At short cue to target lags (<100 ms), neural responses to the target in the receptive field (RF) were usually enhanced if the cue appeared earlier inside the RF (valid) and were suppressed if the cue appeared earlier outside the RF (invalid). This was reversed at longer lags: neural responses were suppressed in the valid conditions and were unaffected in the invalid conditions. The findings support the notion that IOR is a basic mechanism in the evolution of vertebrate behavior and suggest that the effect appears as a result of the interaction between lateral and forward inhibition in the tectal circuitry. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7190666/ /pubmed/32350332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64197-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lev-Ari, Tidhar
Zahar, Yael
Agarwal, Arpit
Gutfreund, Yoram
Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls
title Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls
title_full Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls
title_fullStr Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls
title_short Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls
title_sort behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64197-9
work_keys_str_mv AT levaritidhar behavioralandneuronalstudyofinhibitionofreturninbarnowls
AT zaharyael behavioralandneuronalstudyofinhibitionofreturninbarnowls
AT agarwalarpit behavioralandneuronalstudyofinhibitionofreturninbarnowls
AT gutfreundyoram behavioralandneuronalstudyofinhibitionofreturninbarnowls