Cargando…
The rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Aortic valve stenosis is one of the most common valvular abnormalities, which can manifest as angina, syncope, dyspnoea and sudden cardiac death. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been introduced as an alternative to surgical valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32152782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01380-7 |
_version_ | 1783527752161296384 |
---|---|
author | Simsek, C. Schölzel, B. E. den Heijer, P. Vos, J. Meuwissen, M. van den Branden, B. IJsselmuiden, A. J. J. |
author_facet | Simsek, C. Schölzel, B. E. den Heijer, P. Vos, J. Meuwissen, M. van den Branden, B. IJsselmuiden, A. J. J. |
author_sort | Simsek, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aortic valve stenosis is one of the most common valvular abnormalities, which can manifest as angina, syncope, dyspnoea and sudden cardiac death. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been introduced as an alternative to surgical valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, resulting in less morbidity, shorter time to recovery and similar mortality rates. Progress in this field has reduced complication rates. However, the incidence of peri-procedural stroke remains relatively high (around 4%). To fully utilise the potential of TAVI, cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) have been developed and introduced. In this position paper, we aim to summarise the available data on several CEPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7190763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71907632020-05-04 The rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation Simsek, C. Schölzel, B. E. den Heijer, P. Vos, J. Meuwissen, M. van den Branden, B. IJsselmuiden, A. J. J. Neth Heart J Review Article Aortic valve stenosis is one of the most common valvular abnormalities, which can manifest as angina, syncope, dyspnoea and sudden cardiac death. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been introduced as an alternative to surgical valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, resulting in less morbidity, shorter time to recovery and similar mortality rates. Progress in this field has reduced complication rates. However, the incidence of peri-procedural stroke remains relatively high (around 4%). To fully utilise the potential of TAVI, cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) have been developed and introduced. In this position paper, we aim to summarise the available data on several CEPD. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2020-03-09 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7190763/ /pubmed/32152782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01380-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Simsek, C. Schölzel, B. E. den Heijer, P. Vos, J. Meuwissen, M. van den Branden, B. IJsselmuiden, A. J. J. The rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title | The rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_full | The rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_fullStr | The rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | The rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_short | The rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_sort | rationale of using cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32152782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01380-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simsekc therationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT scholzelbe therationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT denheijerp therationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT vosj therationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT meuwissenm therationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT vandenbrandenb therationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT ijsselmuidenajj therationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT simsekc rationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT scholzelbe rationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT denheijerp rationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT vosj rationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT meuwissenm rationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT vandenbrandenb rationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT ijsselmuidenajj rationaleofusingcerebralembolicprotectiondevicesduringtranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation |