Cargando…
Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review
Since a thorough review in 2011 by Spruyt, into the integral pitfalls of pediatric questionnaires in sleep, sleep researchers worldwide have further evaluated many existing tools. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate and summarize the tools currently in circulation and provide rec...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00317 |
_version_ | 1783527796394426368 |
---|---|
author | Sen, Tabitha Spruyt, Karen |
author_facet | Sen, Tabitha Spruyt, Karen |
author_sort | Sen, Tabitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since a thorough review in 2011 by Spruyt, into the integral pitfalls of pediatric questionnaires in sleep, sleep researchers worldwide have further evaluated many existing tools. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate and summarize the tools currently in circulation and provide recommendations for potential evolving avenues of pediatric sleep interest. 144 “tool”-studies (70 tools) have been published aiming at investigating sleep in primarily 6–18 years old per parental report. Although 27 new tools were discovered, most of the studies translated or evaluated the psychometric properties of existing tools. Some form of normative values has been established in 18 studies. More than half of the tools queried general sleep problems. Extra efforts in tool development are still needed for tools that assess children outside the 6-to-12-year-old age range, as well as for tools examining sleep-related aspects beyond sleep problems/disorders. Especially assessing the validity of tools has been pursued vis-à-vis fulfillment of psychometric criteria. While the Spruyt et al. review provided a rigorous step-by-step guide into the development and validation of such tools, a pattern of steps continue to be overlooked. As these instruments are potentially valuable in assisting in the development of a clinical diagnosis into pediatric sleep pathologies, it is required that while they are primary subjective measures, they behave as objective measures. More tools for specific populations (e.g., in terms of ages, developmental disabilities, and sleep pathologies) are still needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7191040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71910402020-05-08 Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review Sen, Tabitha Spruyt, Karen Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Since a thorough review in 2011 by Spruyt, into the integral pitfalls of pediatric questionnaires in sleep, sleep researchers worldwide have further evaluated many existing tools. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate and summarize the tools currently in circulation and provide recommendations for potential evolving avenues of pediatric sleep interest. 144 “tool”-studies (70 tools) have been published aiming at investigating sleep in primarily 6–18 years old per parental report. Although 27 new tools were discovered, most of the studies translated or evaluated the psychometric properties of existing tools. Some form of normative values has been established in 18 studies. More than half of the tools queried general sleep problems. Extra efforts in tool development are still needed for tools that assess children outside the 6-to-12-year-old age range, as well as for tools examining sleep-related aspects beyond sleep problems/disorders. Especially assessing the validity of tools has been pursued vis-à-vis fulfillment of psychometric criteria. While the Spruyt et al. review provided a rigorous step-by-step guide into the development and validation of such tools, a pattern of steps continue to be overlooked. As these instruments are potentially valuable in assisting in the development of a clinical diagnosis into pediatric sleep pathologies, it is required that while they are primary subjective measures, they behave as objective measures. More tools for specific populations (e.g., in terms of ages, developmental disabilities, and sleep pathologies) are still needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7191040/ /pubmed/32390886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00317 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sen and Spruyt http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Sen, Tabitha Spruyt, Karen Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review |
title | Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review |
title_full | Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review |
title_short | Pediatric Sleep Tools: An Updated Literature Review |
title_sort | pediatric sleep tools: an updated literature review |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sentabitha pediatricsleeptoolsanupdatedliteraturereview AT spruytkaren pediatricsleeptoolsanupdatedliteraturereview |