Cargando…

Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy

IMPORTANCE: Discordance in the interpretations of genetic test results has occurred with the increased number of laboratories that are performing testing. Differences in diagnostic interpretations may have implications for the treatment of patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interlaboratory variation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SoRelle, Jeffrey A., Pascual, Juan M., Gotway, Garrett, Park, Jason Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32347949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3812
_version_ 1783527843578249216
author SoRelle, Jeffrey A.
Pascual, Juan M.
Gotway, Garrett
Park, Jason Y.
author_facet SoRelle, Jeffrey A.
Pascual, Juan M.
Gotway, Garrett
Park, Jason Y.
author_sort SoRelle, Jeffrey A.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Discordance in the interpretations of genetic test results has occurred with the increased number of laboratories that are performing testing. Differences in diagnostic interpretations may have implications for the treatment of patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interlaboratory variation in the interpretations of genetic test results with potential therapeutic implications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, 70 genes that are commonly tested in patients with epilepsy were examined to identify 22 676 genetic variants from an unknown number of patients using the ClinVar public database of clinically annotated variants. Variant annotations submitted to ClinVar (data set version 2019-05) between November 16, 2012, and May 3, 2019, were included in the analysis. Conflicting interpretations of the genetic variants associated with epilepsy were analyzed for clinically substantial discrepancies between May 7 and June 29, 2019. Variants were examined only if they had been interpreted by 2 or more clinical laboratories. A variant with a clinically substantial difference in interpretation was defined as a variant that crossed the threshold between a likely pathogenic variant and a variant of uncertain significance. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The frequency and types of variant interpretation conflicts were analyzed when a conflict was identified. RESULTS: A total of 6292 of 22 676 variants related to epilepsy (27.7%) were interpreted by 2 or more clinical laboratories. Many variants (3307 of 6292 [52.6%]) had interpretations that were fully concordant. However, 2985 variants (47.4%) had conflicting interpretations. A clinically substantial conflict was identified in 201 of 6292 variants (3.2%). Furthermore, 117 of 201 variants (58.2%) with differences in interpretation occurred in genes with therapeutic implications. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study, most interpretations of genetic variants associated with epilepsy were concordant among laboratories, but more than half of the variants with conflicting interpretations occurred in genes that have therapeutic implications. It would be helpful for genetic laboratories to report known diagnostic discordance with other clinical laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7191323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71913232020-05-01 Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy SoRelle, Jeffrey A. Pascual, Juan M. Gotway, Garrett Park, Jason Y. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Discordance in the interpretations of genetic test results has occurred with the increased number of laboratories that are performing testing. Differences in diagnostic interpretations may have implications for the treatment of patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the interlaboratory variation in the interpretations of genetic test results with potential therapeutic implications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, 70 genes that are commonly tested in patients with epilepsy were examined to identify 22 676 genetic variants from an unknown number of patients using the ClinVar public database of clinically annotated variants. Variant annotations submitted to ClinVar (data set version 2019-05) between November 16, 2012, and May 3, 2019, were included in the analysis. Conflicting interpretations of the genetic variants associated with epilepsy were analyzed for clinically substantial discrepancies between May 7 and June 29, 2019. Variants were examined only if they had been interpreted by 2 or more clinical laboratories. A variant with a clinically substantial difference in interpretation was defined as a variant that crossed the threshold between a likely pathogenic variant and a variant of uncertain significance. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The frequency and types of variant interpretation conflicts were analyzed when a conflict was identified. RESULTS: A total of 6292 of 22 676 variants related to epilepsy (27.7%) were interpreted by 2 or more clinical laboratories. Many variants (3307 of 6292 [52.6%]) had interpretations that were fully concordant. However, 2985 variants (47.4%) had conflicting interpretations. A clinically substantial conflict was identified in 201 of 6292 variants (3.2%). Furthermore, 117 of 201 variants (58.2%) with differences in interpretation occurred in genes with therapeutic implications. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study, most interpretations of genetic variants associated with epilepsy were concordant among laboratories, but more than half of the variants with conflicting interpretations occurred in genes that have therapeutic implications. It would be helpful for genetic laboratories to report known diagnostic discordance with other clinical laboratories. American Medical Association 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7191323/ /pubmed/32347949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3812 Text en Copyright 2020 SoRelle JA et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
SoRelle, Jeffrey A.
Pascual, Juan M.
Gotway, Garrett
Park, Jason Y.
Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy
title Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy
title_full Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy
title_fullStr Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy
title_short Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy
title_sort assessment of interlaboratory variation in the interpretation of genomic test results in patients with epilepsy
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32347949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3812
work_keys_str_mv AT sorellejeffreya assessmentofinterlaboratoryvariationintheinterpretationofgenomictestresultsinpatientswithepilepsy
AT pascualjuanm assessmentofinterlaboratoryvariationintheinterpretationofgenomictestresultsinpatientswithepilepsy
AT gotwaygarrett assessmentofinterlaboratoryvariationintheinterpretationofgenomictestresultsinpatientswithepilepsy
AT parkjasony assessmentofinterlaboratoryvariationintheinterpretationofgenomictestresultsinpatientswithepilepsy