Cargando…

The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype

BACKGROUND: Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on earl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Gang, Shi, Weiyi, Niu, Wenbin, Xu, Jiawei, Guo, Yihong, Su, Yingchun, Sun, Yingpu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6731-9
_version_ 1783527892641120256
author Li, Gang
Shi, Weiyi
Niu, Wenbin
Xu, Jiawei
Guo, Yihong
Su, Yingchun
Sun, Yingpu
author_facet Li, Gang
Shi, Weiyi
Niu, Wenbin
Xu, Jiawei
Guo, Yihong
Su, Yingchun
Sun, Yingpu
author_sort Li, Gang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on early embryonic development and molecular karyotype. RESULTS: Twelve couples were recruited including four couples of three-way rearrangements carriers (group A), three couples of double two-way translocations carriers (group B) and five couples of exceptional CCR carriers (group C). A total of 243 oocytes were retrievedin the seventeen preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles, and 207 of these were available for fertilization. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 181oocytes normally fertilized. The rates of embryos forming on day3 in three groups were 87.88, 97.78 and77.14%, which was significantly different (P = 0.01). Compared with group B, the rate of embryo formation was statistically significantly lower in group C (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the rates of high-quality blastocysts in three group were 14.71, 48.15 and 62.96%, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.00). Compared with group B andC, the rate of high-quality blastocysts in group A was statistically significantly lower (P = 0.00;P = 0.00). Comprehensive chromosome analysis was performed on 83 embryos, including 75 trophectodermcellsand 8 blastomeres. Except 7 embryos failed to amplify, 9.01%embryos were diagnosed as euploidy, and 90.91% were diagnosed as abnormal. As for group A, the euploid embryo rate was 10.71%and the abnormal embryo rate was 89.29%. In group B,the euploid embryo rate was 3.85%, the abnormal embryo rate was 96.15%. The euploid embryo rate was 13.04%, the abnormal embryo rate was 86.96% in group C. There were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest rate of high quality blastocysts has been for three-way rearrangements and the lowest rate of euploidy has been for double two-way translocations, although no significant difference. Different types of BCCR maybe have little effect on the embryonic molecular karyotype. The difference of influence of BCCR on early embryonic developmentandmolecular karyotypeshould be further studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7191696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71916962020-05-04 The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype Li, Gang Shi, Weiyi Niu, Wenbin Xu, Jiawei Guo, Yihong Su, Yingchun Sun, Yingpu BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on early embryonic development and molecular karyotype. RESULTS: Twelve couples were recruited including four couples of three-way rearrangements carriers (group A), three couples of double two-way translocations carriers (group B) and five couples of exceptional CCR carriers (group C). A total of 243 oocytes were retrievedin the seventeen preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles, and 207 of these were available for fertilization. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 181oocytes normally fertilized. The rates of embryos forming on day3 in three groups were 87.88, 97.78 and77.14%, which was significantly different (P = 0.01). Compared with group B, the rate of embryo formation was statistically significantly lower in group C (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the rates of high-quality blastocysts in three group were 14.71, 48.15 and 62.96%, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.00). Compared with group B andC, the rate of high-quality blastocysts in group A was statistically significantly lower (P = 0.00;P = 0.00). Comprehensive chromosome analysis was performed on 83 embryos, including 75 trophectodermcellsand 8 blastomeres. Except 7 embryos failed to amplify, 9.01%embryos were diagnosed as euploidy, and 90.91% were diagnosed as abnormal. As for group A, the euploid embryo rate was 10.71%and the abnormal embryo rate was 89.29%. In group B,the euploid embryo rate was 3.85%, the abnormal embryo rate was 96.15%. The euploid embryo rate was 13.04%, the abnormal embryo rate was 86.96% in group C. There were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest rate of high quality blastocysts has been for three-way rearrangements and the lowest rate of euploidy has been for double two-way translocations, although no significant difference. Different types of BCCR maybe have little effect on the embryonic molecular karyotype. The difference of influence of BCCR on early embryonic developmentandmolecular karyotypeshould be further studied. BioMed Central 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7191696/ /pubmed/32349655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6731-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Gang
Shi, Weiyi
Niu, Wenbin
Xu, Jiawei
Guo, Yihong
Su, Yingchun
Sun, Yingpu
The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype
title The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype
title_full The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype
title_fullStr The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype
title_full_unstemmed The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype
title_short The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype
title_sort influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6731-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ligang theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT shiweiyi theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT niuwenbin theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT xujiawei theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT guoyihong theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT suyingchun theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT sunyingpu theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT ligang influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT shiweiyi influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT niuwenbin influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT xujiawei influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT guoyihong influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT suyingchun influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype
AT sunyingpu influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype