Cargando…
The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype
BACKGROUND: Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on earl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6731-9 |
_version_ | 1783527892641120256 |
---|---|
author | Li, Gang Shi, Weiyi Niu, Wenbin Xu, Jiawei Guo, Yihong Su, Yingchun Sun, Yingpu |
author_facet | Li, Gang Shi, Weiyi Niu, Wenbin Xu, Jiawei Guo, Yihong Su, Yingchun Sun, Yingpu |
author_sort | Li, Gang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on early embryonic development and molecular karyotype. RESULTS: Twelve couples were recruited including four couples of three-way rearrangements carriers (group A), three couples of double two-way translocations carriers (group B) and five couples of exceptional CCR carriers (group C). A total of 243 oocytes were retrievedin the seventeen preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles, and 207 of these were available for fertilization. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 181oocytes normally fertilized. The rates of embryos forming on day3 in three groups were 87.88, 97.78 and77.14%, which was significantly different (P = 0.01). Compared with group B, the rate of embryo formation was statistically significantly lower in group C (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the rates of high-quality blastocysts in three group were 14.71, 48.15 and 62.96%, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.00). Compared with group B andC, the rate of high-quality blastocysts in group A was statistically significantly lower (P = 0.00;P = 0.00). Comprehensive chromosome analysis was performed on 83 embryos, including 75 trophectodermcellsand 8 blastomeres. Except 7 embryos failed to amplify, 9.01%embryos were diagnosed as euploidy, and 90.91% were diagnosed as abnormal. As for group A, the euploid embryo rate was 10.71%and the abnormal embryo rate was 89.29%. In group B,the euploid embryo rate was 3.85%, the abnormal embryo rate was 96.15%. The euploid embryo rate was 13.04%, the abnormal embryo rate was 86.96% in group C. There were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest rate of high quality blastocysts has been for three-way rearrangements and the lowest rate of euploidy has been for double two-way translocations, although no significant difference. Different types of BCCR maybe have little effect on the embryonic molecular karyotype. The difference of influence of BCCR on early embryonic developmentandmolecular karyotypeshould be further studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7191696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71916962020-05-04 The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype Li, Gang Shi, Weiyi Niu, Wenbin Xu, Jiawei Guo, Yihong Su, Yingchun Sun, Yingpu BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on early embryonic development and molecular karyotype. RESULTS: Twelve couples were recruited including four couples of three-way rearrangements carriers (group A), three couples of double two-way translocations carriers (group B) and five couples of exceptional CCR carriers (group C). A total of 243 oocytes were retrievedin the seventeen preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles, and 207 of these were available for fertilization. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 181oocytes normally fertilized. The rates of embryos forming on day3 in three groups were 87.88, 97.78 and77.14%, which was significantly different (P = 0.01). Compared with group B, the rate of embryo formation was statistically significantly lower in group C (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the rates of high-quality blastocysts in three group were 14.71, 48.15 and 62.96%, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.00). Compared with group B andC, the rate of high-quality blastocysts in group A was statistically significantly lower (P = 0.00;P = 0.00). Comprehensive chromosome analysis was performed on 83 embryos, including 75 trophectodermcellsand 8 blastomeres. Except 7 embryos failed to amplify, 9.01%embryos were diagnosed as euploidy, and 90.91% were diagnosed as abnormal. As for group A, the euploid embryo rate was 10.71%and the abnormal embryo rate was 89.29%. In group B,the euploid embryo rate was 3.85%, the abnormal embryo rate was 96.15%. The euploid embryo rate was 13.04%, the abnormal embryo rate was 86.96% in group C. There were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The lowest rate of high quality blastocysts has been for three-way rearrangements and the lowest rate of euploidy has been for double two-way translocations, although no significant difference. Different types of BCCR maybe have little effect on the embryonic molecular karyotype. The difference of influence of BCCR on early embryonic developmentandmolecular karyotypeshould be further studied. BioMed Central 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7191696/ /pubmed/32349655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6731-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Gang Shi, Weiyi Niu, Wenbin Xu, Jiawei Guo, Yihong Su, Yingchun Sun, Yingpu The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype |
title | The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype |
title_full | The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype |
title_fullStr | The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype |
title_short | The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype |
title_sort | influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6731-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ligang theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT shiweiyi theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT niuwenbin theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT xujiawei theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT guoyihong theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT suyingchun theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT sunyingpu theinfluenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT ligang influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT shiweiyi influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT niuwenbin influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT xujiawei influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT guoyihong influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT suyingchun influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype AT sunyingpu influenceofbalancedcomplexchromosomalrearrangementsonpreimplantationembryonicdevelopmentpotentialandmolecularkaryotype |