Cargando…

Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload

BACKGROUND: STAR is a model-based, personalised, risk-based dosing approach for glycaemic control (GC) in critically ill patients. STAR provides safe, effective control to nearly all patients, using 1–3 hourly measurement and intervention intervals. However, the average 11–12 measurements per day re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uyttendaele, Vincent, Knopp, Jennifer L., Shaw, Geoffrey M., Desaive, Thomas, Chase, J. Geoffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00771-6
_version_ 1783527916372492288
author Uyttendaele, Vincent
Knopp, Jennifer L.
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Desaive, Thomas
Chase, J. Geoffrey
author_facet Uyttendaele, Vincent
Knopp, Jennifer L.
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Desaive, Thomas
Chase, J. Geoffrey
author_sort Uyttendaele, Vincent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: STAR is a model-based, personalised, risk-based dosing approach for glycaemic control (GC) in critically ill patients. STAR provides safe, effective control to nearly all patients, using 1–3 hourly measurement and intervention intervals. However, the average 11–12 measurements per day required can be a clinical burden in many intensive care units. This study aims to significantly reduce workload by extending STAR 1–3 hourly intervals to 1 to 4-, 5-, and 6-hourly intervals, and evaluate the impact of these longer intervals on GC safety and efficacy, using validated in silico virtual patients and trials methods. A Standard STAR approach was used which allowed more hyperglycaemia over extended intervals, and a STAR Upper Limit Controlled approach limited nutrition to mitigate hyperglycaemia over longer intervention intervals. RESULTS: Extending STAR from 1–3 hourly to 1–6 hourly provided high safety and efficacy for nearly all patients in both approaches. For STAR Standard, virtual trial results showed lower % blood glucose (BG) in the safe 4.4–8.0 mmol/L target band (from 83 to 80%) as treatment intervals increased. Longer intervals resulted in increased risks of hyper- (15% to 18% BG > 8.0 mmol/L) and hypo- (2.1% to 2.8% of patients with min. BG < 2.2 mmol/L) glycaemia. These results were achieved with slightly reduced insulin (3.2 [2.0 5.0] to 2.5 [1.5 3.0] U/h) and nutrition (100 [85 100] to 90 [75 100] % goal feed) rates, but most importantly, with significantly reduced workload (12 to 8 measurements per day). The STAR Upper Limit Controlled approach mitigated hyperglycaemia and had lower insulin and significantly lower nutrition administration rates. CONCLUSIONS: The modest increased risk of hyper- and hypo-glycaemia, and the reduction in nutrition delivery associated with longer treatment intervals represent a significant risk and reward trade-off in GC. However, STAR still provided highly safe, effective control for nearly all patients regardless of treatment intervals and approach, showing this unique risk-based dosing approach, modulating both insulin and nutrition, to be robust in its design. Clinical pilot trials using STAR with different measurement timeframes should be undertaken to confirm these results clinically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7191799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71917992020-05-04 Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload Uyttendaele, Vincent Knopp, Jennifer L. Shaw, Geoffrey M. Desaive, Thomas Chase, J. Geoffrey Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: STAR is a model-based, personalised, risk-based dosing approach for glycaemic control (GC) in critically ill patients. STAR provides safe, effective control to nearly all patients, using 1–3 hourly measurement and intervention intervals. However, the average 11–12 measurements per day required can be a clinical burden in many intensive care units. This study aims to significantly reduce workload by extending STAR 1–3 hourly intervals to 1 to 4-, 5-, and 6-hourly intervals, and evaluate the impact of these longer intervals on GC safety and efficacy, using validated in silico virtual patients and trials methods. A Standard STAR approach was used which allowed more hyperglycaemia over extended intervals, and a STAR Upper Limit Controlled approach limited nutrition to mitigate hyperglycaemia over longer intervention intervals. RESULTS: Extending STAR from 1–3 hourly to 1–6 hourly provided high safety and efficacy for nearly all patients in both approaches. For STAR Standard, virtual trial results showed lower % blood glucose (BG) in the safe 4.4–8.0 mmol/L target band (from 83 to 80%) as treatment intervals increased. Longer intervals resulted in increased risks of hyper- (15% to 18% BG > 8.0 mmol/L) and hypo- (2.1% to 2.8% of patients with min. BG < 2.2 mmol/L) glycaemia. These results were achieved with slightly reduced insulin (3.2 [2.0 5.0] to 2.5 [1.5 3.0] U/h) and nutrition (100 [85 100] to 90 [75 100] % goal feed) rates, but most importantly, with significantly reduced workload (12 to 8 measurements per day). The STAR Upper Limit Controlled approach mitigated hyperglycaemia and had lower insulin and significantly lower nutrition administration rates. CONCLUSIONS: The modest increased risk of hyper- and hypo-glycaemia, and the reduction in nutrition delivery associated with longer treatment intervals represent a significant risk and reward trade-off in GC. However, STAR still provided highly safe, effective control for nearly all patients regardless of treatment intervals and approach, showing this unique risk-based dosing approach, modulating both insulin and nutrition, to be robust in its design. Clinical pilot trials using STAR with different measurement timeframes should be undertaken to confirm these results clinically. BioMed Central 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7191799/ /pubmed/32349750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00771-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Uyttendaele, Vincent
Knopp, Jennifer L.
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Desaive, Thomas
Chase, J. Geoffrey
Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload
title Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload
title_full Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload
title_fullStr Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload
title_full_unstemmed Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload
title_short Risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload
title_sort risk and reward: extending stochastic glycaemic control intervals to reduce workload
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00771-6
work_keys_str_mv AT uyttendaelevincent riskandrewardextendingstochasticglycaemiccontrolintervalstoreduceworkload
AT knoppjenniferl riskandrewardextendingstochasticglycaemiccontrolintervalstoreduceworkload
AT shawgeoffreym riskandrewardextendingstochasticglycaemiccontrolintervalstoreduceworkload
AT desaivethomas riskandrewardextendingstochasticglycaemiccontrolintervalstoreduceworkload
AT chasejgeoffrey riskandrewardextendingstochasticglycaemiccontrolintervalstoreduceworkload