Cargando…

Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study

BACKGROUND: Whether ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical establishment of the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) favorably or adversely affects the patency rate of the RCAVF remains controversial. We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hongtao, Zhu, Guizhen, Yan, Lei, Lu, Yang, Shao, Fengmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01823-8
_version_ 1783527919433285632
author Zhang, Hongtao
Zhu, Guizhen
Yan, Lei
Lu, Yang
Shao, Fengmin
author_facet Zhang, Hongtao
Zhu, Guizhen
Yan, Lei
Lu, Yang
Shao, Fengmin
author_sort Zhang, Hongtao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical establishment of the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) favorably or adversely affects the patency rate of the RCAVF remains controversial. We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of dorsal branch ligation on the patency rate of RCAVF. METHODS: A total of 115 patients who underwent surgical establishment were randomized to two groups treated with or without ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical process. The primary patency rates of the RCAVF at 90, 270, and 360 days after the surgery and the secondary patency rates during a follow-up up to 1 year were compared. RESULTS: The patency rate did not differ significantly between the two groups at 3, 9, or 12 months after the procedure (P > 0.05). The combined primary patency rates of the RCAVF in patients from both groups at 3, 9 and 12 months after the procedure were 87.6, 82, and 74.5% respectively, while the combined secondary patency rate was 92.2% at the 1-year follow-up. The Log-rank test indicated that the initial patency rate and secondary patency rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.674 and 0.759, respectively). CONCLUSION: This clinical study indicated that ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein does not significantly affect the patency of the arteriovenous fistula with a 1-year follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN12288675, Registered 25 September 2019 in the ISRCTN registry. retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7191813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71918132020-05-06 Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study Zhang, Hongtao Zhu, Guizhen Yan, Lei Lu, Yang Shao, Fengmin BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Whether ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical establishment of the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) favorably or adversely affects the patency rate of the RCAVF remains controversial. We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of dorsal branch ligation on the patency rate of RCAVF. METHODS: A total of 115 patients who underwent surgical establishment were randomized to two groups treated with or without ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical process. The primary patency rates of the RCAVF at 90, 270, and 360 days after the surgery and the secondary patency rates during a follow-up up to 1 year were compared. RESULTS: The patency rate did not differ significantly between the two groups at 3, 9, or 12 months after the procedure (P > 0.05). The combined primary patency rates of the RCAVF in patients from both groups at 3, 9 and 12 months after the procedure were 87.6, 82, and 74.5% respectively, while the combined secondary patency rate was 92.2% at the 1-year follow-up. The Log-rank test indicated that the initial patency rate and secondary patency rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.674 and 0.759, respectively). CONCLUSION: This clinical study indicated that ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein does not significantly affect the patency of the arteriovenous fistula with a 1-year follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN12288675, Registered 25 September 2019 in the ISRCTN registry. retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7191813/ /pubmed/32349711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01823-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Hongtao
Zhu, Guizhen
Yan, Lei
Lu, Yang
Shao, Fengmin
Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study
title Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study
title_full Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study
title_fullStr Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study
title_short Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study
title_sort does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? a randomised study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01823-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghongtao doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy
AT zhuguizhen doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy
AT yanlei doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy
AT luyang doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy
AT shaofengmin doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy