Cargando…
Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study
BACKGROUND: Whether ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical establishment of the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) favorably or adversely affects the patency rate of the RCAVF remains controversial. We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01823-8 |
_version_ | 1783527919433285632 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Hongtao Zhu, Guizhen Yan, Lei Lu, Yang Shao, Fengmin |
author_facet | Zhang, Hongtao Zhu, Guizhen Yan, Lei Lu, Yang Shao, Fengmin |
author_sort | Zhang, Hongtao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Whether ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical establishment of the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) favorably or adversely affects the patency rate of the RCAVF remains controversial. We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of dorsal branch ligation on the patency rate of RCAVF. METHODS: A total of 115 patients who underwent surgical establishment were randomized to two groups treated with or without ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical process. The primary patency rates of the RCAVF at 90, 270, and 360 days after the surgery and the secondary patency rates during a follow-up up to 1 year were compared. RESULTS: The patency rate did not differ significantly between the two groups at 3, 9, or 12 months after the procedure (P > 0.05). The combined primary patency rates of the RCAVF in patients from both groups at 3, 9 and 12 months after the procedure were 87.6, 82, and 74.5% respectively, while the combined secondary patency rate was 92.2% at the 1-year follow-up. The Log-rank test indicated that the initial patency rate and secondary patency rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.674 and 0.759, respectively). CONCLUSION: This clinical study indicated that ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein does not significantly affect the patency of the arteriovenous fistula with a 1-year follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN12288675, Registered 25 September 2019 in the ISRCTN registry. retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7191813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71918132020-05-06 Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study Zhang, Hongtao Zhu, Guizhen Yan, Lei Lu, Yang Shao, Fengmin BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Whether ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical establishment of the radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) favorably or adversely affects the patency rate of the RCAVF remains controversial. We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of dorsal branch ligation on the patency rate of RCAVF. METHODS: A total of 115 patients who underwent surgical establishment were randomized to two groups treated with or without ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein during the surgical process. The primary patency rates of the RCAVF at 90, 270, and 360 days after the surgery and the secondary patency rates during a follow-up up to 1 year were compared. RESULTS: The patency rate did not differ significantly between the two groups at 3, 9, or 12 months after the procedure (P > 0.05). The combined primary patency rates of the RCAVF in patients from both groups at 3, 9 and 12 months after the procedure were 87.6, 82, and 74.5% respectively, while the combined secondary patency rate was 92.2% at the 1-year follow-up. The Log-rank test indicated that the initial patency rate and secondary patency rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.674 and 0.759, respectively). CONCLUSION: This clinical study indicated that ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein does not significantly affect the patency of the arteriovenous fistula with a 1-year follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN12288675, Registered 25 September 2019 in the ISRCTN registry. retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7191813/ /pubmed/32349711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01823-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Hongtao Zhu, Guizhen Yan, Lei Lu, Yang Shao, Fengmin Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study |
title | Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study |
title_full | Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study |
title_fullStr | Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study |
title_short | Does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? A randomised study |
title_sort | does ligation of the dorsal branch of the cephalic vein affect the patency of a distal forearm arteriovenous fistula? a randomised study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01823-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghongtao doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy AT zhuguizhen doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy AT yanlei doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy AT luyang doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy AT shaofengmin doesligationofthedorsalbranchofthecephalicveinaffectthepatencyofadistalforearmarteriovenousfistulaarandomisedstudy |