Cargando…

Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results

OBJECTIVES: This study is a comparison of the midterm clinical results of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an allograft and those who had an autograft procedure. METHODS: The results of 70 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an anterior tibial t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cengiz, Ömer, Demir, Necdet, Dırvar, Ferdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32377119
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2018.23281
_version_ 1783527986878742528
author Cengiz, Ömer
Demir, Necdet
Dırvar, Ferdi
author_facet Cengiz, Ömer
Demir, Necdet
Dırvar, Ferdi
author_sort Cengiz, Ömer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study is a comparison of the midterm clinical results of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an allograft and those who had an autograft procedure. METHODS: The results of 70 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an anterior tibial tendon (ATT) allograft (n=18) or a hamstring (HT) autograft (n=52) were evaluated retrospectively. At the last follow-up, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner-Lysholm scores were used to assess functional status, as well as results of the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, and the pivot-shift test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, length of time before operation, graft thickness, or femoral tunnel length (p>0.05). The results were satisfactory in both groups in the postoperative period in terms of the length of time until a return to sports, IKDC score, Tegner-Lysholm score, range of motion, quadriceps circumference, and laxity, with no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested that midterm clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction with an ATT allograft or an HT autograft are similar when the correct technique is used according to the appropriate indications by an experienced surgeon and a successful rehabilitation program implemented after the operation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7192287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71922872020-05-06 Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results Cengiz, Ömer Demir, Necdet Dırvar, Ferdi Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul Original Research OBJECTIVES: This study is a comparison of the midterm clinical results of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an allograft and those who had an autograft procedure. METHODS: The results of 70 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an anterior tibial tendon (ATT) allograft (n=18) or a hamstring (HT) autograft (n=52) were evaluated retrospectively. At the last follow-up, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner-Lysholm scores were used to assess functional status, as well as results of the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, and the pivot-shift test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, length of time before operation, graft thickness, or femoral tunnel length (p>0.05). The results were satisfactory in both groups in the postoperative period in terms of the length of time until a return to sports, IKDC score, Tegner-Lysholm score, range of motion, quadriceps circumference, and laxity, with no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested that midterm clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction with an ATT allograft or an HT autograft are similar when the correct technique is used according to the appropriate indications by an experienced surgeon and a successful rehabilitation program implemented after the operation. Kare Publishing 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7192287/ /pubmed/32377119 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2018.23281 Text en Copyright: © 2019 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cengiz, Ömer
Demir, Necdet
Dırvar, Ferdi
Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results
title Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results
title_full Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results
title_fullStr Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results
title_short Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results
title_sort effects of graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: midterm functional results
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32377119
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2018.23281
work_keys_str_mv AT cengizomer effectsofgraftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmidtermfunctionalresults
AT demirnecdet effectsofgraftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmidtermfunctionalresults
AT dırvarferdi effectsofgraftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionmidtermfunctionalresults