Cargando…

Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment

A composite pain scale for assessing and quantifying pain in rabbits (CANCRS) has been designed merging the Rabbit Grimace Scale (RbtGS) and a scale including clinical parameters (CPS). Construct validity and inter-rater reliability were assessed for CANCRS, for RbtGS and for CPS, in order to test t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banchi, Penelope, Quaranta, Giuseppe, Ricci, Alessandro, Mauthe von Degerfeld, Mitzy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32352960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221377
_version_ 1783527994803879936
author Banchi, Penelope
Quaranta, Giuseppe
Ricci, Alessandro
Mauthe von Degerfeld, Mitzy
author_facet Banchi, Penelope
Quaranta, Giuseppe
Ricci, Alessandro
Mauthe von Degerfeld, Mitzy
author_sort Banchi, Penelope
collection PubMed
description A composite pain scale for assessing and quantifying pain in rabbits (CANCRS) has been designed merging the Rabbit Grimace Scale (RbtGS) and a scale including clinical parameters (CPS). Construct validity and inter-rater reliability were assessed for CANCRS, for RbtGS and for CPS, in order to test their potential to detect pain in a clinical setting. Rabbits (n = 116) were either hybrids or purebreds and they were independently evaluated by two raters, who could be veterinarians (V) or veterinary medicine students (S). Score intervals determined four pain classes (No pain, Discomfort, Moderate pain and Severe pain) that matched presumptive pain classes associated with some pathological conditions. A chi-square test was used to assess the construct validity of the scales by checking how frequently scale results and presumptive pain classes matched. Sixty-nine patients were evaluated by one V and one S, whereas forty-seven rabbits were assessed by two V, in order to test inter-rater reliability. An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test reliability of the scales, whereas Cohen’s kappa tested inter-rater agreement for each parameter of the CANCRS. Construct validity results show that CANCRS and RbtGS efficiently reveal pain (P ≤ 0.05), while CPS does not (p > 0.05). Inter-rater reliability was very good for both CANCRS and CPS (ICC 0.88 V-V, 0.94 between V-S; ICC 0.97 V-V, 0.91 V-S) and good for RbtGS (ICC 0.77 V-V, 0.88 V-S); therefore, CPS reproducibility was better between veterinarians and students than between veterinarians. Inter-rater agreement between veterinarians and veterinary medicine students was moderate to very good for all the parameters included in the CANCRS (Cohen’s kappa >0,60). In conclusion, it is possible to state that the CANCRS has construct validity and it is a reliable tool for use in clinical practice, when coping with many rabbits with morphological differences. It is easy and fast to use and enriches the RbtGS with some clinical parameters that should be monitored during any clinical examination, allowing for capture of the multidimensional aspect of pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7192371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71923712020-05-06 Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment Banchi, Penelope Quaranta, Giuseppe Ricci, Alessandro Mauthe von Degerfeld, Mitzy PLoS One Research Article A composite pain scale for assessing and quantifying pain in rabbits (CANCRS) has been designed merging the Rabbit Grimace Scale (RbtGS) and a scale including clinical parameters (CPS). Construct validity and inter-rater reliability were assessed for CANCRS, for RbtGS and for CPS, in order to test their potential to detect pain in a clinical setting. Rabbits (n = 116) were either hybrids or purebreds and they were independently evaluated by two raters, who could be veterinarians (V) or veterinary medicine students (S). Score intervals determined four pain classes (No pain, Discomfort, Moderate pain and Severe pain) that matched presumptive pain classes associated with some pathological conditions. A chi-square test was used to assess the construct validity of the scales by checking how frequently scale results and presumptive pain classes matched. Sixty-nine patients were evaluated by one V and one S, whereas forty-seven rabbits were assessed by two V, in order to test inter-rater reliability. An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test reliability of the scales, whereas Cohen’s kappa tested inter-rater agreement for each parameter of the CANCRS. Construct validity results show that CANCRS and RbtGS efficiently reveal pain (P ≤ 0.05), while CPS does not (p > 0.05). Inter-rater reliability was very good for both CANCRS and CPS (ICC 0.88 V-V, 0.94 between V-S; ICC 0.97 V-V, 0.91 V-S) and good for RbtGS (ICC 0.77 V-V, 0.88 V-S); therefore, CPS reproducibility was better between veterinarians and students than between veterinarians. Inter-rater agreement between veterinarians and veterinary medicine students was moderate to very good for all the parameters included in the CANCRS (Cohen’s kappa >0,60). In conclusion, it is possible to state that the CANCRS has construct validity and it is a reliable tool for use in clinical practice, when coping with many rabbits with morphological differences. It is easy and fast to use and enriches the RbtGS with some clinical parameters that should be monitored during any clinical examination, allowing for capture of the multidimensional aspect of pain. Public Library of Science 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7192371/ /pubmed/32352960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221377 Text en © 2020 Banchi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Banchi, Penelope
Quaranta, Giuseppe
Ricci, Alessandro
Mauthe von Degerfeld, Mitzy
Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment
title Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment
title_full Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment
title_fullStr Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment
title_short Reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment
title_sort reliability and construct validity of a composite pain scale for rabbit (cancrs) in a clinical environment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32352960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221377
work_keys_str_mv AT banchipenelope reliabilityandconstructvalidityofacompositepainscaleforrabbitcancrsinaclinicalenvironment
AT quarantagiuseppe reliabilityandconstructvalidityofacompositepainscaleforrabbitcancrsinaclinicalenvironment
AT riccialessandro reliabilityandconstructvalidityofacompositepainscaleforrabbitcancrsinaclinicalenvironment
AT mauthevondegerfeldmitzy reliabilityandconstructvalidityofacompositepainscaleforrabbitcancrsinaclinicalenvironment