Cargando…

How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?

We measured psychophysical thresholds for discriminating the speeds of two arrays of moving dots. The arrays could be juxtaposed or could be spatially separated by up to 10 degrees of visual angle, eccentricity being held constant. We found that the precision of the judgments varied little with sepa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danilova, M. V., Takahashi, C., Mollon, J. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32352993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231959
_version_ 1783528006762889216
author Danilova, M. V.
Takahashi, C.
Mollon, J. D.
author_facet Danilova, M. V.
Takahashi, C.
Mollon, J. D.
author_sort Danilova, M. V.
collection PubMed
description We measured psychophysical thresholds for discriminating the speeds of two arrays of moving dots. The arrays could be juxtaposed or could be spatially separated by up to 10 degrees of visual angle, eccentricity being held constant. We found that the precision of the judgments varied little with separation. Moreover, the function relating threshold to separation was similar whether the arrays moved in the same, in opposite or in orthogonal directions. And there was no significant difference in threshold whether the two stimuli were initially presented to the same cerebral hemisphere or to opposite ones. How are human observers able to compare stimuli that fall at well separated positions in the visual field? We consider two classes of explanation: (i) Observers’ judgments might be based directly on the signals of dedicated ‘comparator neurons’, i.e. neurons drawing inputs of opposite sign from local regions of the visual field. (ii) Signals about local features might be transmitted to the site of comparison by a shared ‘cerebral bus’, where the same physical substrate carries different information from moment to moment. The minimal effects of proximity and direction (which might be expected to influence local detectors of relative motion), and the combinatorial explosion in the number of comparator neurons that would be required by (i), lead us to favor models of type (ii).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7192430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71924302020-05-11 How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects? Danilova, M. V. Takahashi, C. Mollon, J. D. PLoS One Research Article We measured psychophysical thresholds for discriminating the speeds of two arrays of moving dots. The arrays could be juxtaposed or could be spatially separated by up to 10 degrees of visual angle, eccentricity being held constant. We found that the precision of the judgments varied little with separation. Moreover, the function relating threshold to separation was similar whether the arrays moved in the same, in opposite or in orthogonal directions. And there was no significant difference in threshold whether the two stimuli were initially presented to the same cerebral hemisphere or to opposite ones. How are human observers able to compare stimuli that fall at well separated positions in the visual field? We consider two classes of explanation: (i) Observers’ judgments might be based directly on the signals of dedicated ‘comparator neurons’, i.e. neurons drawing inputs of opposite sign from local regions of the visual field. (ii) Signals about local features might be transmitted to the site of comparison by a shared ‘cerebral bus’, where the same physical substrate carries different information from moment to moment. The minimal effects of proximity and direction (which might be expected to influence local detectors of relative motion), and the combinatorial explosion in the number of comparator neurons that would be required by (i), lead us to favor models of type (ii). Public Library of Science 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7192430/ /pubmed/32352993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231959 Text en © 2020 Danilova et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Danilova, M. V.
Takahashi, C.
Mollon, J. D.
How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?
title How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?
title_full How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?
title_fullStr How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?
title_full_unstemmed How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?
title_short How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?
title_sort how does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32352993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231959
work_keys_str_mv AT danilovamv howdoesthehumanvisualsystemcomparethespeedsofspatiallyseparatedobjects
AT takahashic howdoesthehumanvisualsystemcomparethespeedsofspatiallyseparatedobjects
AT mollonjd howdoesthehumanvisualsystemcomparethespeedsofspatiallyseparatedobjects