Cargando…
Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography
Here, we investigate the extent to which re-implementing a previously published algorithm for OCT-based drusen quantification permits replicating the reported accuracy on an independent dataset. We refined that algorithm so that its accuracy is increased. Following a systematic literature search, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63924-6 |
_version_ | 1783528096508411904 |
---|---|
author | Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh Wiens, Vitalis Thiele, Sarah Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. Schultz, Thomas |
author_facet | Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh Wiens, Vitalis Thiele, Sarah Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. Schultz, Thomas |
author_sort | Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here, we investigate the extent to which re-implementing a previously published algorithm for OCT-based drusen quantification permits replicating the reported accuracy on an independent dataset. We refined that algorithm so that its accuracy is increased. Following a systematic literature search, an algorithm was selected based on its reported excellent results. Several steps were added to improve its accuracy. The replicated and refined algorithms were evaluated on an independent dataset with the same metrics as in the original publication. Accuracy of the refined algorithm (overlap ratio 36–52%) was significantly greater than the replicated one (overlap ratio 25–39%). In particular, separation of the retinal pigment epithelium and the ellipsoid zone could be improved by the refinement. However, accuracy was still lower than reported previously on different data (overlap ratio 67–76%). This is the first replication study of an algorithm for OCT image analysis. Its results indicate that current standards for algorithm validation do not provide a reliable estimate of algorithm performance on images that differ with respect to patient selection and image quality. In order to contribute to an improved reproducibility in this field, we publish both our replication and the refinement, as well as an exemplary dataset. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7192932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71929322020-05-05 Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh Wiens, Vitalis Thiele, Sarah Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. Schultz, Thomas Sci Rep Article Here, we investigate the extent to which re-implementing a previously published algorithm for OCT-based drusen quantification permits replicating the reported accuracy on an independent dataset. We refined that algorithm so that its accuracy is increased. Following a systematic literature search, an algorithm was selected based on its reported excellent results. Several steps were added to improve its accuracy. The replicated and refined algorithms were evaluated on an independent dataset with the same metrics as in the original publication. Accuracy of the refined algorithm (overlap ratio 36–52%) was significantly greater than the replicated one (overlap ratio 25–39%). In particular, separation of the retinal pigment epithelium and the ellipsoid zone could be improved by the refinement. However, accuracy was still lower than reported previously on different data (overlap ratio 67–76%). This is the first replication study of an algorithm for OCT image analysis. Its results indicate that current standards for algorithm validation do not provide a reliable estimate of algorithm performance on images that differ with respect to patient selection and image quality. In order to contribute to an improved reproducibility in this field, we publish both our replication and the refinement, as well as an exemplary dataset. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7192932/ /pubmed/32355285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63924-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh Wiens, Vitalis Thiele, Sarah Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. Schultz, Thomas Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography |
title | Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography |
title_full | Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography |
title_fullStr | Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography |
title_short | Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography |
title_sort | replication and refinement of an algorithm for automated drusen segmentation on optical coherence tomography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63924-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wintergerstmaximilianwm replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography AT gorgizadehshekoufeh replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography AT wiensvitalis replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography AT thielesarah replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography AT schmitzvalckenbergsteffen replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography AT holzfrankg replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography AT fingerrobertp replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography AT schultzthomas replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography |