Cargando…

Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography

Here, we investigate the extent to which re-implementing a previously published algorithm for OCT-based drusen quantification permits replicating the reported accuracy on an independent dataset. We refined that algorithm so that its accuracy is increased. Following a systematic literature search, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M., Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh, Wiens, Vitalis, Thiele, Sarah, Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen, Holz, Frank G., Finger, Robert P., Schultz, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63924-6
_version_ 1783528096508411904
author Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh
Wiens, Vitalis
Thiele, Sarah
Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen
Holz, Frank G.
Finger, Robert P.
Schultz, Thomas
author_facet Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh
Wiens, Vitalis
Thiele, Sarah
Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen
Holz, Frank G.
Finger, Robert P.
Schultz, Thomas
author_sort Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
collection PubMed
description Here, we investigate the extent to which re-implementing a previously published algorithm for OCT-based drusen quantification permits replicating the reported accuracy on an independent dataset. We refined that algorithm so that its accuracy is increased. Following a systematic literature search, an algorithm was selected based on its reported excellent results. Several steps were added to improve its accuracy. The replicated and refined algorithms were evaluated on an independent dataset with the same metrics as in the original publication. Accuracy of the refined algorithm (overlap ratio 36–52%) was significantly greater than the replicated one (overlap ratio 25–39%). In particular, separation of the retinal pigment epithelium and the ellipsoid zone could be improved by the refinement. However, accuracy was still lower than reported previously on different data (overlap ratio 67–76%). This is the first replication study of an algorithm for OCT image analysis. Its results indicate that current standards for algorithm validation do not provide a reliable estimate of algorithm performance on images that differ with respect to patient selection and image quality. In order to contribute to an improved reproducibility in this field, we publish both our replication and the refinement, as well as an exemplary dataset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7192932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71929322020-05-05 Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh Wiens, Vitalis Thiele, Sarah Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen Holz, Frank G. Finger, Robert P. Schultz, Thomas Sci Rep Article Here, we investigate the extent to which re-implementing a previously published algorithm for OCT-based drusen quantification permits replicating the reported accuracy on an independent dataset. We refined that algorithm so that its accuracy is increased. Following a systematic literature search, an algorithm was selected based on its reported excellent results. Several steps were added to improve its accuracy. The replicated and refined algorithms were evaluated on an independent dataset with the same metrics as in the original publication. Accuracy of the refined algorithm (overlap ratio 36–52%) was significantly greater than the replicated one (overlap ratio 25–39%). In particular, separation of the retinal pigment epithelium and the ellipsoid zone could be improved by the refinement. However, accuracy was still lower than reported previously on different data (overlap ratio 67–76%). This is the first replication study of an algorithm for OCT image analysis. Its results indicate that current standards for algorithm validation do not provide a reliable estimate of algorithm performance on images that differ with respect to patient selection and image quality. In order to contribute to an improved reproducibility in this field, we publish both our replication and the refinement, as well as an exemplary dataset. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7192932/ /pubmed/32355285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63924-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M.
Gorgi Zadeh, Shekoufeh
Wiens, Vitalis
Thiele, Sarah
Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen
Holz, Frank G.
Finger, Robert P.
Schultz, Thomas
Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography
title Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography
title_fullStr Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography
title_short Replication and Refinement of an Algorithm for Automated Drusen Segmentation on Optical Coherence Tomography
title_sort replication and refinement of an algorithm for automated drusen segmentation on optical coherence tomography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7192932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63924-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wintergerstmaximilianwm replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography
AT gorgizadehshekoufeh replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography
AT wiensvitalis replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography
AT thielesarah replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography
AT schmitzvalckenbergsteffen replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography
AT holzfrankg replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography
AT fingerrobertp replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography
AT schultzthomas replicationandrefinementofanalgorithmforautomateddrusensegmentationonopticalcoherencetomography