Cargando…
A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index
BACKGROUND: Making an informed choice between the available infant formulas is challenging, as there is no unbiased tool allowing a systematic comparison between the very long lists of infant formula compositions. AIM: The aim is to present the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index (BCSI) as a tool for syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.01.004 |
_version_ | 1783528120585814016 |
---|---|
author | Al-Abdi, Sameer Aljughaiman, Abdullah Alrashidi, Jaber Aldarwish, Manar Zekri, Alaa Alshamari, Falah |
author_facet | Al-Abdi, Sameer Aljughaiman, Abdullah Alrashidi, Jaber Aldarwish, Manar Zekri, Alaa Alshamari, Falah |
author_sort | Al-Abdi, Sameer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Making an informed choice between the available infant formulas is challenging, as there is no unbiased tool allowing a systematic comparison between the very long lists of infant formula compositions. AIM: The aim is to present the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index (BCSI) as a tool for systematic comparison between standard stage-1 infant formula (SS-1-IF) compositions. METHODS: We obtained the nutrient levels from the packaging labels of 23 SS-1-IFs available in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, in April 2018. The international legislations that launched infant formula standards endorse targeting the minimum rather than the maximum proposed nutrients levels. Thus, we blindly compared between displayed nutrients levels on each of the 23-studied SS-1-IF and the minimum international proposed nutrient levels via using the BCSI. RESULTS: The range of the total displayed components was 38–57. Except for docosahexaenoic acid, all displayed components were within the standard recommended range. The BCSI summarized all displayed nutrients in a single number. The BCSI of the studied SS-1-IF ranged from 0.4141 to 0.79730. We ranked the 23 studied SS-1-IFs based on the higher BCSI is the closer to the minimum proposed nutrient levels. A dendrogram segregated the SS-1-IFs into four clusters based on their BSCI and total numbers of all displayed components. CONCLUSIONS: We think the BCSI is an appropriate tool for a systematic comparison between SS-1-IFs compositions and may help for choosing a SS-1-IF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7193073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71930732020-05-05 A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index Al-Abdi, Sameer Aljughaiman, Abdullah Alrashidi, Jaber Aldarwish, Manar Zekri, Alaa Alshamari, Falah Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med Article BACKGROUND: Making an informed choice between the available infant formulas is challenging, as there is no unbiased tool allowing a systematic comparison between the very long lists of infant formula compositions. AIM: The aim is to present the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index (BCSI) as a tool for systematic comparison between standard stage-1 infant formula (SS-1-IF) compositions. METHODS: We obtained the nutrient levels from the packaging labels of 23 SS-1-IFs available in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, in April 2018. The international legislations that launched infant formula standards endorse targeting the minimum rather than the maximum proposed nutrients levels. Thus, we blindly compared between displayed nutrients levels on each of the 23-studied SS-1-IF and the minimum international proposed nutrient levels via using the BCSI. RESULTS: The range of the total displayed components was 38–57. Except for docosahexaenoic acid, all displayed components were within the standard recommended range. The BCSI summarized all displayed nutrients in a single number. The BCSI of the studied SS-1-IF ranged from 0.4141 to 0.79730. We ranked the 23 studied SS-1-IFs based on the higher BCSI is the closer to the minimum proposed nutrient levels. A dendrogram segregated the SS-1-IFs into four clusters based on their BSCI and total numbers of all displayed components. CONCLUSIONS: We think the BCSI is an appropriate tool for a systematic comparison between SS-1-IFs compositions and may help for choosing a SS-1-IF. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2020-03 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7193073/ /pubmed/32373702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.01.004 Text en © 2020 Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (General Organization), Saudi Arabia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Al-Abdi, Sameer Aljughaiman, Abdullah Alrashidi, Jaber Aldarwish, Manar Zekri, Alaa Alshamari, Falah A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index |
title | A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index |
title_full | A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index |
title_fullStr | A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index |
title_short | A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index |
title_sort | systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the bray-curtis similarity index |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.01.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alabdisameer asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT aljughaimanabdullah asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT alrashidijaber asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT aldarwishmanar asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT zekrialaa asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT alshamarifalah asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT alabdisameer systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT aljughaimanabdullah systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT alrashidijaber systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT aldarwishmanar systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT zekrialaa systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex AT alshamarifalah systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex |