Cargando…

A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index

BACKGROUND: Making an informed choice between the available infant formulas is challenging, as there is no unbiased tool allowing a systematic comparison between the very long lists of infant formula compositions. AIM: The aim is to present the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index (BCSI) as a tool for syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Abdi, Sameer, Aljughaiman, Abdullah, Alrashidi, Jaber, Aldarwish, Manar, Zekri, Alaa, Alshamari, Falah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.01.004
_version_ 1783528120585814016
author Al-Abdi, Sameer
Aljughaiman, Abdullah
Alrashidi, Jaber
Aldarwish, Manar
Zekri, Alaa
Alshamari, Falah
author_facet Al-Abdi, Sameer
Aljughaiman, Abdullah
Alrashidi, Jaber
Aldarwish, Manar
Zekri, Alaa
Alshamari, Falah
author_sort Al-Abdi, Sameer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Making an informed choice between the available infant formulas is challenging, as there is no unbiased tool allowing a systematic comparison between the very long lists of infant formula compositions. AIM: The aim is to present the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index (BCSI) as a tool for systematic comparison between standard stage-1 infant formula (SS-1-IF) compositions. METHODS: We obtained the nutrient levels from the packaging labels of 23 SS-1-IFs available in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, in April 2018. The international legislations that launched infant formula standards endorse targeting the minimum rather than the maximum proposed nutrients levels. Thus, we blindly compared between displayed nutrients levels on each of the 23-studied SS-1-IF and the minimum international proposed nutrient levels via using the BCSI. RESULTS: The range of the total displayed components was 38–57. Except for docosahexaenoic acid, all displayed components were within the standard recommended range. The BCSI summarized all displayed nutrients in a single number. The BCSI of the studied SS-1-IF ranged from 0.4141 to 0.79730. We ranked the 23 studied SS-1-IFs based on the higher BCSI is the closer to the minimum proposed nutrient levels. A dendrogram segregated the SS-1-IFs into four clusters based on their BSCI and total numbers of all displayed components. CONCLUSIONS: We think the BCSI is an appropriate tool for a systematic comparison between SS-1-IFs compositions and may help for choosing a SS-1-IF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7193073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71930732020-05-05 A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index Al-Abdi, Sameer Aljughaiman, Abdullah Alrashidi, Jaber Aldarwish, Manar Zekri, Alaa Alshamari, Falah Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med Article BACKGROUND: Making an informed choice between the available infant formulas is challenging, as there is no unbiased tool allowing a systematic comparison between the very long lists of infant formula compositions. AIM: The aim is to present the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index (BCSI) as a tool for systematic comparison between standard stage-1 infant formula (SS-1-IF) compositions. METHODS: We obtained the nutrient levels from the packaging labels of 23 SS-1-IFs available in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, in April 2018. The international legislations that launched infant formula standards endorse targeting the minimum rather than the maximum proposed nutrients levels. Thus, we blindly compared between displayed nutrients levels on each of the 23-studied SS-1-IF and the minimum international proposed nutrient levels via using the BCSI. RESULTS: The range of the total displayed components was 38–57. Except for docosahexaenoic acid, all displayed components were within the standard recommended range. The BCSI summarized all displayed nutrients in a single number. The BCSI of the studied SS-1-IF ranged from 0.4141 to 0.79730. We ranked the 23 studied SS-1-IFs based on the higher BCSI is the closer to the minimum proposed nutrient levels. A dendrogram segregated the SS-1-IFs into four clusters based on their BSCI and total numbers of all displayed components. CONCLUSIONS: We think the BCSI is an appropriate tool for a systematic comparison between SS-1-IFs compositions and may help for choosing a SS-1-IF. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2020-03 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7193073/ /pubmed/32373702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.01.004 Text en © 2020 Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (General Organization), Saudi Arabia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Al-Abdi, Sameer
Aljughaiman, Abdullah
Alrashidi, Jaber
Aldarwish, Manar
Zekri, Alaa
Alshamari, Falah
A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index
title A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index
title_full A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index
title_fullStr A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index
title_full_unstemmed A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index
title_short A systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index
title_sort systematic comparison between infant formula compositions using the bray-curtis similarity index
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.01.004
work_keys_str_mv AT alabdisameer asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT aljughaimanabdullah asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT alrashidijaber asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT aldarwishmanar asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT zekrialaa asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT alshamarifalah asystematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT alabdisameer systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT aljughaimanabdullah systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT alrashidijaber systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT aldarwishmanar systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT zekrialaa systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex
AT alshamarifalah systematiccomparisonbetweeninfantformulacompositionsusingthebraycurtissimilarityindex