Cargando…
Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification
OBJECTIVE: To determine, time to angiography for patients with positive gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on prior investigation (endoscopy [ES], nuclear medicine [NM] Tc99m red blood cells (RBC) scan, or computed tomography angiography), affects angiographic bleed identification. MATERIALS AND METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363078 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_132_2019 |
_version_ | 1783528137981689856 |
---|---|
author | Brahmbhatt, Akshaar Rao, Pranay Cantos, Andrew Butani, Devang |
author_facet | Brahmbhatt, Akshaar Rao, Pranay Cantos, Andrew Butani, Devang |
author_sort | Brahmbhatt, Akshaar |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine, time to angiography for patients with positive gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on prior investigation (endoscopy [ES], nuclear medicine [NM] Tc99m red blood cells (RBC) scan, or computed tomography angiography), affects angiographic bleed identification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Visceral Angiograms performed from January 2012 to August 2017 were evaluated. Initial angiograms performed for GIB were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included recent abdominal surgery or procedure (30 days), empiric embolization (embolization without visualized active bleeding), and use of vasodilators, or subsequent angiogram. Timing and results of ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram and catheter angiogram were recorded. In addition, age, gender, angiogram time, anti- platelet therapy, anti-coagulation therapy, bleed location, international normalized ratio, and units of packed RBCs received in the 24 h before catheter angiography were included in the study. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy angiograms were included in the final analysis. Forty-three angiograms resulted in the identification of an active bleed (68.9 years, and 67.4% male). All of these patients were embolized successfully. One hundred and twenty-seven angiograms failed to identify an active bleed (70.4 years, and 49.6% male). No significance was found across the two groups with respect to time from prior positive investigation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that units of packed RBCs received in the preceding 24 h were correlated with positive bleed identification on catheter angiography. CONCLUSION: Time to angiography from prior positive investigation, including ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram does not correlate with positive angiographic outcomes. Increasing units of packed RBCs administered in the 24 h before angiogram do correlate with positive angiographic findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7193149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71931492020-05-01 Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification Brahmbhatt, Akshaar Rao, Pranay Cantos, Andrew Butani, Devang J Clin Imaging Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine, time to angiography for patients with positive gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on prior investigation (endoscopy [ES], nuclear medicine [NM] Tc99m red blood cells (RBC) scan, or computed tomography angiography), affects angiographic bleed identification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Visceral Angiograms performed from January 2012 to August 2017 were evaluated. Initial angiograms performed for GIB were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included recent abdominal surgery or procedure (30 days), empiric embolization (embolization without visualized active bleeding), and use of vasodilators, or subsequent angiogram. Timing and results of ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram and catheter angiogram were recorded. In addition, age, gender, angiogram time, anti- platelet therapy, anti-coagulation therapy, bleed location, international normalized ratio, and units of packed RBCs received in the 24 h before catheter angiography were included in the study. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy angiograms were included in the final analysis. Forty-three angiograms resulted in the identification of an active bleed (68.9 years, and 67.4% male). All of these patients were embolized successfully. One hundred and twenty-seven angiograms failed to identify an active bleed (70.4 years, and 49.6% male). No significance was found across the two groups with respect to time from prior positive investigation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that units of packed RBCs received in the preceding 24 h were correlated with positive bleed identification on catheter angiography. CONCLUSION: Time to angiography from prior positive investigation, including ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram does not correlate with positive angiographic outcomes. Increasing units of packed RBCs administered in the 24 h before angiogram do correlate with positive angiographic findings. Scientific Scholar 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7193149/ /pubmed/32363078 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_132_2019 Text en © 2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Brahmbhatt, Akshaar Rao, Pranay Cantos, Andrew Butani, Devang Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification |
title | Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification |
title_full | Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification |
title_fullStr | Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification |
title_full_unstemmed | Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification |
title_short | Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification |
title_sort | time to catheter angiography for gastrointestinal bleeding after prior positive investigation does not affect bleed identification |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363078 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_132_2019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brahmbhattakshaar timetocatheterangiographyforgastrointestinalbleedingafterpriorpositiveinvestigationdoesnotaffectbleedidentification AT raopranay timetocatheterangiographyforgastrointestinalbleedingafterpriorpositiveinvestigationdoesnotaffectbleedidentification AT cantosandrew timetocatheterangiographyforgastrointestinalbleedingafterpriorpositiveinvestigationdoesnotaffectbleedidentification AT butanidevang timetocatheterangiographyforgastrointestinalbleedingafterpriorpositiveinvestigationdoesnotaffectbleedidentification |