Cargando…

Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification

OBJECTIVE: To determine, time to angiography for patients with positive gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on prior investigation (endoscopy [ES], nuclear medicine [NM] Tc99m red blood cells (RBC) scan, or computed tomography angiography), affects angiographic bleed identification. MATERIALS AND METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brahmbhatt, Akshaar, Rao, Pranay, Cantos, Andrew, Butani, Devang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363078
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_132_2019
_version_ 1783528137981689856
author Brahmbhatt, Akshaar
Rao, Pranay
Cantos, Andrew
Butani, Devang
author_facet Brahmbhatt, Akshaar
Rao, Pranay
Cantos, Andrew
Butani, Devang
author_sort Brahmbhatt, Akshaar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine, time to angiography for patients with positive gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on prior investigation (endoscopy [ES], nuclear medicine [NM] Tc99m red blood cells (RBC) scan, or computed tomography angiography), affects angiographic bleed identification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Visceral Angiograms performed from January 2012 to August 2017 were evaluated. Initial angiograms performed for GIB were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included recent abdominal surgery or procedure (30 days), empiric embolization (embolization without visualized active bleeding), and use of vasodilators, or subsequent angiogram. Timing and results of ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram and catheter angiogram were recorded. In addition, age, gender, angiogram time, anti- platelet therapy, anti-coagulation therapy, bleed location, international normalized ratio, and units of packed RBCs received in the 24 h before catheter angiography were included in the study. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy angiograms were included in the final analysis. Forty-three angiograms resulted in the identification of an active bleed (68.9 years, and 67.4% male). All of these patients were embolized successfully. One hundred and twenty-seven angiograms failed to identify an active bleed (70.4 years, and 49.6% male). No significance was found across the two groups with respect to time from prior positive investigation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that units of packed RBCs received in the preceding 24 h were correlated with positive bleed identification on catheter angiography. CONCLUSION: Time to angiography from prior positive investigation, including ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram does not correlate with positive angiographic outcomes. Increasing units of packed RBCs administered in the 24 h before angiogram do correlate with positive angiographic findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7193149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71931492020-05-01 Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification Brahmbhatt, Akshaar Rao, Pranay Cantos, Andrew Butani, Devang J Clin Imaging Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine, time to angiography for patients with positive gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on prior investigation (endoscopy [ES], nuclear medicine [NM] Tc99m red blood cells (RBC) scan, or computed tomography angiography), affects angiographic bleed identification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Visceral Angiograms performed from January 2012 to August 2017 were evaluated. Initial angiograms performed for GIB were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included recent abdominal surgery or procedure (30 days), empiric embolization (embolization without visualized active bleeding), and use of vasodilators, or subsequent angiogram. Timing and results of ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram and catheter angiogram were recorded. In addition, age, gender, angiogram time, anti- platelet therapy, anti-coagulation therapy, bleed location, international normalized ratio, and units of packed RBCs received in the 24 h before catheter angiography were included in the study. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy angiograms were included in the final analysis. Forty-three angiograms resulted in the identification of an active bleed (68.9 years, and 67.4% male). All of these patients were embolized successfully. One hundred and twenty-seven angiograms failed to identify an active bleed (70.4 years, and 49.6% male). No significance was found across the two groups with respect to time from prior positive investigation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that units of packed RBCs received in the preceding 24 h were correlated with positive bleed identification on catheter angiography. CONCLUSION: Time to angiography from prior positive investigation, including ES, NM Tc99m RBC scan, or computed tomography angiogram does not correlate with positive angiographic outcomes. Increasing units of packed RBCs administered in the 24 h before angiogram do correlate with positive angiographic findings. Scientific Scholar 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7193149/ /pubmed/32363078 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_132_2019 Text en © 2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Brahmbhatt, Akshaar
Rao, Pranay
Cantos, Andrew
Butani, Devang
Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification
title Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification
title_full Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification
title_fullStr Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification
title_full_unstemmed Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification
title_short Time to Catheter Angiography for Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Prior Positive Investigation Does Not Affect Bleed Identification
title_sort time to catheter angiography for gastrointestinal bleeding after prior positive investigation does not affect bleed identification
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363078
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_132_2019
work_keys_str_mv AT brahmbhattakshaar timetocatheterangiographyforgastrointestinalbleedingafterpriorpositiveinvestigationdoesnotaffectbleedidentification
AT raopranay timetocatheterangiographyforgastrointestinalbleedingafterpriorpositiveinvestigationdoesnotaffectbleedidentification
AT cantosandrew timetocatheterangiographyforgastrointestinalbleedingafterpriorpositiveinvestigationdoesnotaffectbleedidentification
AT butanidevang timetocatheterangiographyforgastrointestinalbleedingafterpriorpositiveinvestigationdoesnotaffectbleedidentification