Cargando…

Students tell us what good written feedback looks like

Feedback can be an important element of learning, but only if students engage with it. Students are only likely to engage with feedback that they find useful. This study aimed to identify characteristics of written feedback perceived by students as effective. We used a mixed‐method approach, integra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voelkel, Susanne, Varga‐Atkins, Tunde, Mello, Luciane V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12841
_version_ 1783528141617102848
author Voelkel, Susanne
Varga‐Atkins, Tunde
Mello, Luciane V.
author_facet Voelkel, Susanne
Varga‐Atkins, Tunde
Mello, Luciane V.
author_sort Voelkel, Susanne
collection PubMed
description Feedback can be an important element of learning, but only if students engage with it. Students are only likely to engage with feedback that they find useful. This study aimed to identify characteristics of written feedback perceived by students as effective. We used a mixed‐method approach, integrating quantitative and qualitative data that were collected through the analysis of feedback that was identified by students as good, a student questionnaire, as well as interviews and a focus group exploring students’ views on what good feedback looks like. Although the results show that length and composition of ‘good’ feedback can be extremely variable, some common characteristics could be identified, leading to a set of recommendations for staff marking written assessments. According to students, good feedback should be detailed and specific, and it should tell students how they can improve. Students also find it important that feedback is honest and constructive. In addition, positive reinforcement was identified as important by the focus group, although few examples of good written feedback on the assignment contained any direct praise. Surprisingly, feedforward which might help students in other modules did not feature highly in students’ perceptions of good feedback, possibly indicating a focus by students on improving the current assignment rather than on future assignments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7193163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71931632020-05-01 Students tell us what good written feedback looks like Voelkel, Susanne Varga‐Atkins, Tunde Mello, Luciane V. FEBS Open Bio Education Article Feedback can be an important element of learning, but only if students engage with it. Students are only likely to engage with feedback that they find useful. This study aimed to identify characteristics of written feedback perceived by students as effective. We used a mixed‐method approach, integrating quantitative and qualitative data that were collected through the analysis of feedback that was identified by students as good, a student questionnaire, as well as interviews and a focus group exploring students’ views on what good feedback looks like. Although the results show that length and composition of ‘good’ feedback can be extremely variable, some common characteristics could be identified, leading to a set of recommendations for staff marking written assessments. According to students, good feedback should be detailed and specific, and it should tell students how they can improve. Students also find it important that feedback is honest and constructive. In addition, positive reinforcement was identified as important by the focus group, although few examples of good written feedback on the assignment contained any direct praise. Surprisingly, feedforward which might help students in other modules did not feature highly in students’ perceptions of good feedback, possibly indicating a focus by students on improving the current assignment rather than on future assignments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7193163/ /pubmed/32176832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12841 Text en The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Education Article
Voelkel, Susanne
Varga‐Atkins, Tunde
Mello, Luciane V.
Students tell us what good written feedback looks like
title Students tell us what good written feedback looks like
title_full Students tell us what good written feedback looks like
title_fullStr Students tell us what good written feedback looks like
title_full_unstemmed Students tell us what good written feedback looks like
title_short Students tell us what good written feedback looks like
title_sort students tell us what good written feedback looks like
topic Education Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12841
work_keys_str_mv AT voelkelsusanne studentstelluswhatgoodwrittenfeedbacklookslike
AT vargaatkinstunde studentstelluswhatgoodwrittenfeedbacklookslike
AT mellolucianev studentstelluswhatgoodwrittenfeedbacklookslike