Cargando…

Review of Toyoda K, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):539-548

BACKGROUND: Prior meta-analyses showed that treatment with cilostazol, with or without aspirin, significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke, occurrence of hemorrhagic stroke, and frequency of other serious vascular adverse events. METHODS: This review highlights the value of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lo, Benjamin W. Y., Miyawaki, Satoru, Fukuda, Hitoshi, Koyanagi, Masaomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363048
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_83_2020
_version_ 1783528146704793600
author Lo, Benjamin W. Y.
Miyawaki, Satoru
Fukuda, Hitoshi
Koyanagi, Masaomi
author_facet Lo, Benjamin W. Y.
Miyawaki, Satoru
Fukuda, Hitoshi
Koyanagi, Masaomi
author_sort Lo, Benjamin W. Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior meta-analyses showed that treatment with cilostazol, with or without aspirin, significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke, occurrence of hemorrhagic stroke, and frequency of other serious vascular adverse events. METHODS: This review highlights the value of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Toyoda et al. entitled, “Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.” Here, dual therapy consisting of cilostazol and another antiplatelet agent was used to prevent secondary ischemic stroke in high-risk Japanese patients. RESULTS: Patients on dual therapy consisting of cilostazol/aspirin or cilostazol/clopidogrel had significantly lower frequencies of recurrent stroke. However, there were significant differences in the incidence of attendant hemorrhagic complications utilizing mono or dual therapy. CONCLUSION: This RCT demonstrated the safety of dual therapy, consisting of cilostazol/aspirin or cilostazol/ clopidogrel, in preventing secondary ischemic stroke in a high-risk Japanese population. Further studies are required to generalize these findings to other patient populations worldwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7193192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71931922020-05-01 Review of Toyoda K, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):539-548 Lo, Benjamin W. Y. Miyawaki, Satoru Fukuda, Hitoshi Koyanagi, Masaomi Surg Neurol Int Editorial BACKGROUND: Prior meta-analyses showed that treatment with cilostazol, with or without aspirin, significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke, occurrence of hemorrhagic stroke, and frequency of other serious vascular adverse events. METHODS: This review highlights the value of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Toyoda et al. entitled, “Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.” Here, dual therapy consisting of cilostazol and another antiplatelet agent was used to prevent secondary ischemic stroke in high-risk Japanese patients. RESULTS: Patients on dual therapy consisting of cilostazol/aspirin or cilostazol/clopidogrel had significantly lower frequencies of recurrent stroke. However, there were significant differences in the incidence of attendant hemorrhagic complications utilizing mono or dual therapy. CONCLUSION: This RCT demonstrated the safety of dual therapy, consisting of cilostazol/aspirin or cilostazol/ clopidogrel, in preventing secondary ischemic stroke in a high-risk Japanese population. Further studies are required to generalize these findings to other patient populations worldwide. Scientific Scholar 2020-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7193192/ /pubmed/32363048 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_83_2020 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Editorial
Lo, Benjamin W. Y.
Miyawaki, Satoru
Fukuda, Hitoshi
Koyanagi, Masaomi
Review of Toyoda K, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):539-548
title Review of Toyoda K, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):539-548
title_full Review of Toyoda K, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):539-548
title_fullStr Review of Toyoda K, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):539-548
title_full_unstemmed Review of Toyoda K, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):539-548
title_short Review of Toyoda K, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in Japan. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):539-548
title_sort review of toyoda k, et al. dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol for secondary prevention in patients with high-risk ischemic stroke in japan. lancet neurol. 2019 jun;18(6):539-548
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363048
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_83_2020
work_keys_str_mv AT lobenjaminwy reviewoftoyodaketaldualantiplatelettherapyusingcilostazolforsecondarypreventioninpatientswithhighriskischemicstrokeinjapanlancetneurol2019jun186539548
AT miyawakisatoru reviewoftoyodaketaldualantiplatelettherapyusingcilostazolforsecondarypreventioninpatientswithhighriskischemicstrokeinjapanlancetneurol2019jun186539548
AT fukudahitoshi reviewoftoyodaketaldualantiplatelettherapyusingcilostazolforsecondarypreventioninpatientswithhighriskischemicstrokeinjapanlancetneurol2019jun186539548
AT koyanagimasaomi reviewoftoyodaketaldualantiplatelettherapyusingcilostazolforsecondarypreventioninpatientswithhighriskischemicstrokeinjapanlancetneurol2019jun186539548