Cargando…

Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare phase contrast (PC) imaging with invasive measurements of cardiac output (CO) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 81 cases with PH who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and right heart catheteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Po, Jose Ricardo, Tong, Matthew, Meeran, Talha, Potluri, Alekhya, Raina, Amresh, Doyle, Mark, Biederman, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363088
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_36_2020
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare phase contrast (PC) imaging with invasive measurements of cardiac output (CO) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 81 cases with PH who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and right heart catheterization (RHC). Measurement of CO and stroke volume (SV) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed by PC imaging of the proximal aorta (Ao) and pulmonary artery (Pa) and by RHC using the Fick and thermodilution (TD) methods. RESULTS: There was good correlation in CO measurements between PC and RHC; however, there was better correlation with SV measurements; Fick-TD (r=0.85), PC-TD (Ao r=0.77, Pa r=0.79), and PC-Fick (Ao r = 0.73, Pa r = 0.78). Bland-Altman analysis of SV showed that Pa PC had slightly lower standard deviation than Ao PC; PC-Fick (Pa SD = 15.11 vs. Ao SD = 16.4 ml) and PC-TD (Pa SD = 16.99 ml vs. Ao SD = 17.4 ml) while Fick-TD had the lowest (SD = 14.4 ml). Compared to Fick, measurement of SV with Ao PC (‒4.12 ml) and Pa PC (0.22 ml) both had lower mean difference than TD (‒11.1 ml). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive measurement of CO and SV using PC-CMR correlates well with invasive measurement using RHC. Our study showed that PC-CMR had high accuracy and precision when compared to Fick. Among all the modalities, PC-CMR contributed the least amount of variation in measurements.