Cargando…

Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare phase contrast (PC) imaging with invasive measurements of cardiac output (CO) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 81 cases with PH who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and right heart catheteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Po, Jose Ricardo, Tong, Matthew, Meeran, Talha, Potluri, Alekhya, Raina, Amresh, Doyle, Mark, Biederman, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363088
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_36_2020
_version_ 1783528150645342208
author Po, Jose Ricardo
Tong, Matthew
Meeran, Talha
Potluri, Alekhya
Raina, Amresh
Doyle, Mark
Biederman, Robert
author_facet Po, Jose Ricardo
Tong, Matthew
Meeran, Talha
Potluri, Alekhya
Raina, Amresh
Doyle, Mark
Biederman, Robert
author_sort Po, Jose Ricardo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare phase contrast (PC) imaging with invasive measurements of cardiac output (CO) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 81 cases with PH who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and right heart catheterization (RHC). Measurement of CO and stroke volume (SV) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed by PC imaging of the proximal aorta (Ao) and pulmonary artery (Pa) and by RHC using the Fick and thermodilution (TD) methods. RESULTS: There was good correlation in CO measurements between PC and RHC; however, there was better correlation with SV measurements; Fick-TD (r=0.85), PC-TD (Ao r=0.77, Pa r=0.79), and PC-Fick (Ao r = 0.73, Pa r = 0.78). Bland-Altman analysis of SV showed that Pa PC had slightly lower standard deviation than Ao PC; PC-Fick (Pa SD = 15.11 vs. Ao SD = 16.4 ml) and PC-TD (Pa SD = 16.99 ml vs. Ao SD = 17.4 ml) while Fick-TD had the lowest (SD = 14.4 ml). Compared to Fick, measurement of SV with Ao PC (‒4.12 ml) and Pa PC (0.22 ml) both had lower mean difference than TD (‒11.1 ml). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive measurement of CO and SV using PC-CMR correlates well with invasive measurement using RHC. Our study showed that PC-CMR had high accuracy and precision when compared to Fick. Among all the modalities, PC-CMR contributed the least amount of variation in measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7193209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71932092020-05-02 Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Po, Jose Ricardo Tong, Matthew Meeran, Talha Potluri, Alekhya Raina, Amresh Doyle, Mark Biederman, Robert J Clin Imaging Sci Original Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare phase contrast (PC) imaging with invasive measurements of cardiac output (CO) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 81 cases with PH who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and right heart catheterization (RHC). Measurement of CO and stroke volume (SV) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed by PC imaging of the proximal aorta (Ao) and pulmonary artery (Pa) and by RHC using the Fick and thermodilution (TD) methods. RESULTS: There was good correlation in CO measurements between PC and RHC; however, there was better correlation with SV measurements; Fick-TD (r=0.85), PC-TD (Ao r=0.77, Pa r=0.79), and PC-Fick (Ao r = 0.73, Pa r = 0.78). Bland-Altman analysis of SV showed that Pa PC had slightly lower standard deviation than Ao PC; PC-Fick (Pa SD = 15.11 vs. Ao SD = 16.4 ml) and PC-TD (Pa SD = 16.99 ml vs. Ao SD = 17.4 ml) while Fick-TD had the lowest (SD = 14.4 ml). Compared to Fick, measurement of SV with Ao PC (‒4.12 ml) and Pa PC (0.22 ml) both had lower mean difference than TD (‒11.1 ml). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive measurement of CO and SV using PC-CMR correlates well with invasive measurement using RHC. Our study showed that PC-CMR had high accuracy and precision when compared to Fick. Among all the modalities, PC-CMR contributed the least amount of variation in measurements. Scientific Scholar 2020-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7193209/ /pubmed/32363088 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_36_2020 Text en © 2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research
Po, Jose Ricardo
Tong, Matthew
Meeran, Talha
Potluri, Alekhya
Raina, Amresh
Doyle, Mark
Biederman, Robert
Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension
title Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension
title_full Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension
title_fullStr Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension
title_short Quantification of Cardiac Output with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension
title_sort quantification of cardiac output with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pulmonary hypertension
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363088
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_36_2020
work_keys_str_mv AT pojosericardo quantificationofcardiacoutputwithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT tongmatthew quantificationofcardiacoutputwithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT meerantalha quantificationofcardiacoutputwithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT potlurialekhya quantificationofcardiacoutputwithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT rainaamresh quantificationofcardiacoutputwithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT doylemark quantificationofcardiacoutputwithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension
AT biedermanrobert quantificationofcardiacoutputwithphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithpulmonaryhypertension