Cargando…

Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Gasless laparoscopy, developed in the early 1990s, was a means to minimize the clinical and financial challenges of pneumoperitoneum and general anaesthesia. It has been used in a variety of procedures such as in general surgery and gynecology procedures including diagnostic laparoscopy....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shoman, Haitham, Sandler, Simone, Peters, Alexander, Farooq, Ameer, Gruendl, Magdalen, Trinh, Shauna, Little, James, Woods, Alex, Bolton, William, Abioye, Abubakar, Ljungman, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01365-y
_version_ 1783528178573115392
author Shoman, Haitham
Sandler, Simone
Peters, Alexander
Farooq, Ameer
Gruendl, Magdalen
Trinh, Shauna
Little, James
Woods, Alex
Bolton, William
Abioye, Abubakar
Ljungman, David
author_facet Shoman, Haitham
Sandler, Simone
Peters, Alexander
Farooq, Ameer
Gruendl, Magdalen
Trinh, Shauna
Little, James
Woods, Alex
Bolton, William
Abioye, Abubakar
Ljungman, David
author_sort Shoman, Haitham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gasless laparoscopy, developed in the early 1990s, was a means to minimize the clinical and financial challenges of pneumoperitoneum and general anaesthesia. It has been used in a variety of procedures such as in general surgery and gynecology procedures including diagnostic laparoscopy. There has been increasing evidence of the utility of gasless laparoscopy in resource limited settings where diagnostic imaging is not available. In addition, it may help save costs for hospitals. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the available evidence surrounding the safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy and open techniques and to analyze the benefits that gasless laparoscopy has for low resource setting hospitals. METHODS: This protocol is developed by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis–Protocols (PRISMA-P). The PRISMA statement guidelines and flowchart will be used to conduct the study itself. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Global Index Medicus (WHO) will be searched and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials database. The articles that will be found will be pooled into Covidence article manager software where all the records will be screened for eligibility and duplicates removed. A data extraction spreadsheet will be developed based on variables of interest set a priori. Reviewers will then screen all included studies based on the eligibility criteria. The GRADE tool will be used to assess the quality of the studies and the risk of bias in all the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk assessment tool. The RoB II tool will assed the risk of bias in randomized control studies and the ROBINS I will be used for the non-randomized studies. DISCUSSION: This study will be a comprehensive review on all published articles found using this search strategy on the safety and efficiency of the use of gasless laparoscopy. The systematic review outcomes will include safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy compared to the use of conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered in PROSPERO under registration number: CRD42017078338
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7193343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71933432020-05-06 Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol Shoman, Haitham Sandler, Simone Peters, Alexander Farooq, Ameer Gruendl, Magdalen Trinh, Shauna Little, James Woods, Alex Bolton, William Abioye, Abubakar Ljungman, David Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Gasless laparoscopy, developed in the early 1990s, was a means to minimize the clinical and financial challenges of pneumoperitoneum and general anaesthesia. It has been used in a variety of procedures such as in general surgery and gynecology procedures including diagnostic laparoscopy. There has been increasing evidence of the utility of gasless laparoscopy in resource limited settings where diagnostic imaging is not available. In addition, it may help save costs for hospitals. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the available evidence surrounding the safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy and open techniques and to analyze the benefits that gasless laparoscopy has for low resource setting hospitals. METHODS: This protocol is developed by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis–Protocols (PRISMA-P). The PRISMA statement guidelines and flowchart will be used to conduct the study itself. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Global Index Medicus (WHO) will be searched and the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials database. The articles that will be found will be pooled into Covidence article manager software where all the records will be screened for eligibility and duplicates removed. A data extraction spreadsheet will be developed based on variables of interest set a priori. Reviewers will then screen all included studies based on the eligibility criteria. The GRADE tool will be used to assess the quality of the studies and the risk of bias in all the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk assessment tool. The RoB II tool will assed the risk of bias in randomized control studies and the ROBINS I will be used for the non-randomized studies. DISCUSSION: This study will be a comprehensive review on all published articles found using this search strategy on the safety and efficiency of the use of gasless laparoscopy. The systematic review outcomes will include safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy compared to the use of conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered in PROSPERO under registration number: CRD42017078338 BioMed Central 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7193343/ /pubmed/32354349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01365-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Shoman, Haitham
Sandler, Simone
Peters, Alexander
Farooq, Ameer
Gruendl, Magdalen
Trinh, Shauna
Little, James
Woods, Alex
Bolton, William
Abioye, Abubakar
Ljungman, David
Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol
title Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol
title_full Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol
title_short Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol
title_sort safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01365-y
work_keys_str_mv AT shomanhaitham safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT sandlersimone safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT petersalexander safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT farooqameer safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT gruendlmagdalen safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT trinhshauna safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT littlejames safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT woodsalex safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT boltonwilliam safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT abioyeabubakar safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol
AT ljungmandavid safetyandefficiencyofgaslesslaparoscopyasystematicreviewprotocol