Cargando…
Self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type
BACKGROUND: Detained asylum seekers are at increased risk of self-harm, and the type of detention in which they are held may further exacerbate this risk. In Australia, there are four types of closed (or held) immigration detention for people seeking asylum, with varying levels of security and suppo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08717-2 |
_version_ | 1783528185311264768 |
---|---|
author | Hedrick, Kyli Armstrong, Gregory Coffey, Guy Borschmann, Rohan |
author_facet | Hedrick, Kyli Armstrong, Gregory Coffey, Guy Borschmann, Rohan |
author_sort | Hedrick, Kyli |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Detained asylum seekers are at increased risk of self-harm, and the type of detention in which they are held may further exacerbate this risk. In Australia, there are four types of closed (or held) immigration detention for people seeking asylum, with varying levels of security and supports: Immigration Detention Centres [IDCs], Immigration Transit Accommodation [ITAs], Immigration Residential Housing [IRH], and Alternative Places of Detention [APODs]. The objective of this study was to examine the variation in the incidence and method(s) of self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention, according to the type of detention in which they are held. METHODS: We obtained data on all self-harm incidents reported among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention according to held detention type, as well as individual facility, between 1 August 2014 and 31 July 2015, by Freedom of Information. We calculated self-harm episode rates per 1000 asylum seekers using the average population figures for held detention type, as well as for each individual facility comprising the main types of held detention. Method(s) used to self-harm was also extracted for the main sub-populations. RESULTS: The study included 560 episodes of self-harm. Individual facility rates of self-harm ranged from 91 per 1000 asylum seekers (95% CI 72–110) in Yongah Hill IDC to 533 per 1000 asylum seekers (95% CI 487–578) in Perth IDC. On average, calculated self-harm episode rates were highest among asylum seekers in: Immigration Transit Accommodation facilities, 452/1000 (95% CI 410–493); Alternative Places of Detention, 265/1000 (95% CI 233–296); and Immigration Detention Centres, 225/1000 (95% CI 195–254). The most frequently reported methods of self-harm across the main types of held detention were: cutting (35.2%), self-battery (34.8%), and attempted hanging (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Self-harm rates for asylum seekers in all types of closed immigration detention were many times higher than rates found in the general population. Average rates were not lower in facilities with lower security features. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7193373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71933732020-05-06 Self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type Hedrick, Kyli Armstrong, Gregory Coffey, Guy Borschmann, Rohan BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Detained asylum seekers are at increased risk of self-harm, and the type of detention in which they are held may further exacerbate this risk. In Australia, there are four types of closed (or held) immigration detention for people seeking asylum, with varying levels of security and supports: Immigration Detention Centres [IDCs], Immigration Transit Accommodation [ITAs], Immigration Residential Housing [IRH], and Alternative Places of Detention [APODs]. The objective of this study was to examine the variation in the incidence and method(s) of self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention, according to the type of detention in which they are held. METHODS: We obtained data on all self-harm incidents reported among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention according to held detention type, as well as individual facility, between 1 August 2014 and 31 July 2015, by Freedom of Information. We calculated self-harm episode rates per 1000 asylum seekers using the average population figures for held detention type, as well as for each individual facility comprising the main types of held detention. Method(s) used to self-harm was also extracted for the main sub-populations. RESULTS: The study included 560 episodes of self-harm. Individual facility rates of self-harm ranged from 91 per 1000 asylum seekers (95% CI 72–110) in Yongah Hill IDC to 533 per 1000 asylum seekers (95% CI 487–578) in Perth IDC. On average, calculated self-harm episode rates were highest among asylum seekers in: Immigration Transit Accommodation facilities, 452/1000 (95% CI 410–493); Alternative Places of Detention, 265/1000 (95% CI 233–296); and Immigration Detention Centres, 225/1000 (95% CI 195–254). The most frequently reported methods of self-harm across the main types of held detention were: cutting (35.2%), self-battery (34.8%), and attempted hanging (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Self-harm rates for asylum seekers in all types of closed immigration detention were many times higher than rates found in the general population. Average rates were not lower in facilities with lower security features. BioMed Central 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7193373/ /pubmed/32354370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08717-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hedrick, Kyli Armstrong, Gregory Coffey, Guy Borschmann, Rohan Self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type |
title | Self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type |
title_full | Self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type |
title_fullStr | Self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type |
title_short | Self-harm among asylum seekers in Australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type |
title_sort | self-harm among asylum seekers in australian onshore immigration detention: how incidence rates vary by held detention type |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08717-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hedrickkyli selfharmamongasylumseekersinaustralianonshoreimmigrationdetentionhowincidenceratesvarybyhelddetentiontype AT armstronggregory selfharmamongasylumseekersinaustralianonshoreimmigrationdetentionhowincidenceratesvarybyhelddetentiontype AT coffeyguy selfharmamongasylumseekersinaustralianonshoreimmigrationdetentionhowincidenceratesvarybyhelddetentiontype AT borschmannrohan selfharmamongasylumseekersinaustralianonshoreimmigrationdetentionhowincidenceratesvarybyhelddetentiontype |