Cargando…
Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation
Several theories propose that perceptual decision making depends on the gradual accumulation of information that provides evidence in favour of one of the choice-options. The outcome of this temporally extended integration process is thought to be categorized into the ‘winning’ and ‘losing’ choice-o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64064-7 |
_version_ | 1783528228496867328 |
---|---|
author | Murd, Carolina Moisa, Marius Grueschow, Marcus Polania, Rafael Ruff, Christian C. |
author_facet | Murd, Carolina Moisa, Marius Grueschow, Marcus Polania, Rafael Ruff, Christian C. |
author_sort | Murd, Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several theories propose that perceptual decision making depends on the gradual accumulation of information that provides evidence in favour of one of the choice-options. The outcome of this temporally extended integration process is thought to be categorized into the ‘winning’ and ‘losing’ choice-options for action. Neural correlates of corresponding decision formation processes have been observed in various frontal and parietal brain areas, among them the frontal eye-fields (FEF). However, the specific functional role of the FEFs is debated. Recent studies in humans and rodents provide conflicting accounts, proposing that the FEF either accumulate the choice-relevant information or categorize the outcome of such evidence integration into discrete actions. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on humans to interfere with either left or right FEF activity during different timepoints of perceptual decision-formation. Stimulation of either FEF affected performance only when delivered during information integration but not during subsequent categorical choice. However, the patterns of behavioural changes suggest that the left-FEF contributes to general evidence integration, whereas right-FEF may direct spatial attention to the contralateral hemifield. Taken together, our results indicate an FEF involvement in evidence accumulation but not categorization, and suggest hemispheric lateralization for this function in the human brain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7193618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71936182020-05-08 Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation Murd, Carolina Moisa, Marius Grueschow, Marcus Polania, Rafael Ruff, Christian C. Sci Rep Article Several theories propose that perceptual decision making depends on the gradual accumulation of information that provides evidence in favour of one of the choice-options. The outcome of this temporally extended integration process is thought to be categorized into the ‘winning’ and ‘losing’ choice-options for action. Neural correlates of corresponding decision formation processes have been observed in various frontal and parietal brain areas, among them the frontal eye-fields (FEF). However, the specific functional role of the FEFs is debated. Recent studies in humans and rodents provide conflicting accounts, proposing that the FEF either accumulate the choice-relevant information or categorize the outcome of such evidence integration into discrete actions. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on humans to interfere with either left or right FEF activity during different timepoints of perceptual decision-formation. Stimulation of either FEF affected performance only when delivered during information integration but not during subsequent categorical choice. However, the patterns of behavioural changes suggest that the left-FEF contributes to general evidence integration, whereas right-FEF may direct spatial attention to the contralateral hemifield. Taken together, our results indicate an FEF involvement in evidence accumulation but not categorization, and suggest hemispheric lateralization for this function in the human brain. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7193618/ /pubmed/32355294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64064-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Murd, Carolina Moisa, Marius Grueschow, Marcus Polania, Rafael Ruff, Christian C. Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation |
title | Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation |
title_full | Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation |
title_fullStr | Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation |
title_full_unstemmed | Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation |
title_short | Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation |
title_sort | causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7193618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64064-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murdcarolina causalcontributionsofhumanfrontaleyefieldstodistinctaspectsofdecisionformation AT moisamarius causalcontributionsofhumanfrontaleyefieldstodistinctaspectsofdecisionformation AT grueschowmarcus causalcontributionsofhumanfrontaleyefieldstodistinctaspectsofdecisionformation AT polaniarafael causalcontributionsofhumanfrontaleyefieldstodistinctaspectsofdecisionformation AT ruffchristianc causalcontributionsofhumanfrontaleyefieldstodistinctaspectsofdecisionformation |