Cargando…

Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery

Clinical practice still relies heavily on traditional paper-and-pencil testing to assess a patient’s cognitive functions. Digital technology has the potential to be an efficient and powerful alternative, but for many of the existing digital tests and test batteries the psychometric properties have n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vermeent, Stefan, Dotsch, Ron, Schmand, Ben, Klaming, Laura, Miller, Justin B., van Elswijk, Gijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7194127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00770
_version_ 1783528305570349056
author Vermeent, Stefan
Dotsch, Ron
Schmand, Ben
Klaming, Laura
Miller, Justin B.
van Elswijk, Gijs
author_facet Vermeent, Stefan
Dotsch, Ron
Schmand, Ben
Klaming, Laura
Miller, Justin B.
van Elswijk, Gijs
author_sort Vermeent, Stefan
collection PubMed
description Clinical practice still relies heavily on traditional paper-and-pencil testing to assess a patient’s cognitive functions. Digital technology has the potential to be an efficient and powerful alternative, but for many of the existing digital tests and test batteries the psychometric properties have not been properly established. We validated a newly developed digital test battery consisting of digitized versions of conventional neuropsychological tests. Two confirmatory factor analysis models were specified: a model based on traditional neuropsychological theory and expert consensus and one based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) taxonomy. For both models, the outcome measures of the digital tests loaded on the cognitive domains in the same way as established in the neuropsychological literature. Interestingly, no clear distinction could be made between the CHC model and traditional neuropsychological model in terms of model fit. Taken together, these findings provide preliminary evidence for the structural validity of the digital cognitive test battery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7194127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71941272020-05-08 Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery Vermeent, Stefan Dotsch, Ron Schmand, Ben Klaming, Laura Miller, Justin B. van Elswijk, Gijs Front Psychol Psychology Clinical practice still relies heavily on traditional paper-and-pencil testing to assess a patient’s cognitive functions. Digital technology has the potential to be an efficient and powerful alternative, but for many of the existing digital tests and test batteries the psychometric properties have not been properly established. We validated a newly developed digital test battery consisting of digitized versions of conventional neuropsychological tests. Two confirmatory factor analysis models were specified: a model based on traditional neuropsychological theory and expert consensus and one based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) taxonomy. For both models, the outcome measures of the digital tests loaded on the cognitive domains in the same way as established in the neuropsychological literature. Interestingly, no clear distinction could be made between the CHC model and traditional neuropsychological model in terms of model fit. Taken together, these findings provide preliminary evidence for the structural validity of the digital cognitive test battery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7194127/ /pubmed/32390918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00770 Text en Copyright © 2020 Vermeent, Dotsch, Schmand, Klaming, Miller and van Elswijk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Vermeent, Stefan
Dotsch, Ron
Schmand, Ben
Klaming, Laura
Miller, Justin B.
van Elswijk, Gijs
Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery
title Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery
title_full Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery
title_fullStr Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery
title_short Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery
title_sort evidence of validity for a newly developed digital cognitive test battery
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7194127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00770
work_keys_str_mv AT vermeentstefan evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery
AT dotschron evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery
AT schmandben evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery
AT klaminglaura evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery
AT millerjustinb evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery
AT vanelswijkgijs evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery