Cargando…
Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery
Clinical practice still relies heavily on traditional paper-and-pencil testing to assess a patient’s cognitive functions. Digital technology has the potential to be an efficient and powerful alternative, but for many of the existing digital tests and test batteries the psychometric properties have n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7194127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00770 |
_version_ | 1783528305570349056 |
---|---|
author | Vermeent, Stefan Dotsch, Ron Schmand, Ben Klaming, Laura Miller, Justin B. van Elswijk, Gijs |
author_facet | Vermeent, Stefan Dotsch, Ron Schmand, Ben Klaming, Laura Miller, Justin B. van Elswijk, Gijs |
author_sort | Vermeent, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical practice still relies heavily on traditional paper-and-pencil testing to assess a patient’s cognitive functions. Digital technology has the potential to be an efficient and powerful alternative, but for many of the existing digital tests and test batteries the psychometric properties have not been properly established. We validated a newly developed digital test battery consisting of digitized versions of conventional neuropsychological tests. Two confirmatory factor analysis models were specified: a model based on traditional neuropsychological theory and expert consensus and one based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) taxonomy. For both models, the outcome measures of the digital tests loaded on the cognitive domains in the same way as established in the neuropsychological literature. Interestingly, no clear distinction could be made between the CHC model and traditional neuropsychological model in terms of model fit. Taken together, these findings provide preliminary evidence for the structural validity of the digital cognitive test battery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7194127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71941272020-05-08 Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery Vermeent, Stefan Dotsch, Ron Schmand, Ben Klaming, Laura Miller, Justin B. van Elswijk, Gijs Front Psychol Psychology Clinical practice still relies heavily on traditional paper-and-pencil testing to assess a patient’s cognitive functions. Digital technology has the potential to be an efficient and powerful alternative, but for many of the existing digital tests and test batteries the psychometric properties have not been properly established. We validated a newly developed digital test battery consisting of digitized versions of conventional neuropsychological tests. Two confirmatory factor analysis models were specified: a model based on traditional neuropsychological theory and expert consensus and one based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) taxonomy. For both models, the outcome measures of the digital tests loaded on the cognitive domains in the same way as established in the neuropsychological literature. Interestingly, no clear distinction could be made between the CHC model and traditional neuropsychological model in terms of model fit. Taken together, these findings provide preliminary evidence for the structural validity of the digital cognitive test battery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7194127/ /pubmed/32390918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00770 Text en Copyright © 2020 Vermeent, Dotsch, Schmand, Klaming, Miller and van Elswijk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Vermeent, Stefan Dotsch, Ron Schmand, Ben Klaming, Laura Miller, Justin B. van Elswijk, Gijs Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery |
title | Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery |
title_full | Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery |
title_fullStr | Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery |
title_short | Evidence of Validity for a Newly Developed Digital Cognitive Test Battery |
title_sort | evidence of validity for a newly developed digital cognitive test battery |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7194127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00770 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vermeentstefan evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery AT dotschron evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery AT schmandben evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery AT klaminglaura evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery AT millerjustinb evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery AT vanelswijkgijs evidenceofvalidityforanewlydevelopeddigitalcognitivetestbattery |