Cargando…

Comprehensive Laboratory Evaluation of a Specific Lateral Flow Assay for the Presumptive Identification of Francisella tularensis in Suspicious White Powders and Aerosol Samples

We conducted a comprehensive, multi-phase laboratory evaluation of the Tularemia BioThreat Alert(®) (BTA) test, a lateral flow assay (LFA) for the rapid detection of Francisella tularensis. The study, conducted at 2 sites, evaluated the limit of detection (LOD) of this assay using the virulent SchuS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pillai, Segaran P., DePalma, Lindsay, Prentice, Kristin W., Ramage, Jason G., Chapman, Carol, Sarwar, Jawad, Parameswaran, Nishanth, Petersen, Jeannine, Yockey, Brook, Young, John, Singh, Ajay, Pillai, Christine A., Manickam, Gowri, Thirunavkkarasu, Nagarajan, Avila, Julie R., Sharma, Shashi, Morse, Stephen A., Venkateswaran, Kodumudi, Anderson, Kevin, Hodge, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7194312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32324068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0151
Descripción
Sumario:We conducted a comprehensive, multi-phase laboratory evaluation of the Tularemia BioThreat Alert(®) (BTA) test, a lateral flow assay (LFA) for the rapid detection of Francisella tularensis. The study, conducted at 2 sites, evaluated the limit of detection (LOD) of this assay using the virulent SchuS4 strain and the avirulent LVS strain of F. tularensis. In 6-phase evaluation (linear dynamic range and reproducibility, inclusivity, near-neighbor, environmental background, white powder, and environmental filter extract), 13 diverse strains of F. tularensis, 8 Francisella near neighbors, 61 environmental background organisms, 26 white powders, and a pooled aerosol extract were tested. In the 937 tests performed, the Tularemia BTA demonstrated an LOD of 10(7) to 10(8) cfu/mL, with a sensitivity of 100.00%, specificity of 98.08%, and accuracy of 98.84%. These performance data are important for accurate interpretation of qualitative results arising from screening suspicious white powders in the field.