Cargando…

A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time

Divisive normalization has long been used to account for computations in various neural processes and behaviours. The model proposes that inputs into a neural system are divisively normalized by the system’s total activity. More recently, dynamical versions of divisive normalization have been shown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keung, Waitsang, Hagen, Todd A., Wilson, Robert C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32358501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15630-0
_version_ 1783528543671549952
author Keung, Waitsang
Hagen, Todd A.
Wilson, Robert C.
author_facet Keung, Waitsang
Hagen, Todd A.
Wilson, Robert C.
author_sort Keung, Waitsang
collection PubMed
description Divisive normalization has long been used to account for computations in various neural processes and behaviours. The model proposes that inputs into a neural system are divisively normalized by the system’s total activity. More recently, dynamical versions of divisive normalization have been shown to account for how neural activity evolves over time in value-based decision making. Despite its ubiquity, divisive normalization has not been studied in decisions that require evidence to be integrated over time. Such decisions are important when the information is not all available at once. A key feature of such decisions is how evidence is weighted over time, known as the integration kernel. Here, we provide a formal expression for the integration kernel in divisive normalization, and show that divisive normalization quantitatively accounts for 133 human participants’ perceptual decision making behaviour, performing as well as the state-of-the-art Drift Diffusion Model, the predominant model for perceptual evidence accumulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7195479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71954792020-05-05 A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time Keung, Waitsang Hagen, Todd A. Wilson, Robert C. Nat Commun Article Divisive normalization has long been used to account for computations in various neural processes and behaviours. The model proposes that inputs into a neural system are divisively normalized by the system’s total activity. More recently, dynamical versions of divisive normalization have been shown to account for how neural activity evolves over time in value-based decision making. Despite its ubiquity, divisive normalization has not been studied in decisions that require evidence to be integrated over time. Such decisions are important when the information is not all available at once. A key feature of such decisions is how evidence is weighted over time, known as the integration kernel. Here, we provide a formal expression for the integration kernel in divisive normalization, and show that divisive normalization quantitatively accounts for 133 human participants’ perceptual decision making behaviour, performing as well as the state-of-the-art Drift Diffusion Model, the predominant model for perceptual evidence accumulation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7195479/ /pubmed/32358501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15630-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Keung, Waitsang
Hagen, Todd A.
Wilson, Robert C.
A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_full A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_fullStr A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_full_unstemmed A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_short A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
title_sort divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32358501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15630-0
work_keys_str_mv AT keungwaitsang adivisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime
AT hagentodda adivisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime
AT wilsonrobertc adivisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime
AT keungwaitsang divisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime
AT hagentodda divisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime
AT wilsonrobertc divisivemodelofevidenceaccumulationexplainsunevenweightingofevidenceovertime