Cargando…
Dramatic impact of metric choice on biogeographical regionalization
For a quantitative biogeographical regionalization, the choice of an appropriate dissimilarity index to measure pairwise distances is crucial. Several different metrics have been used, but there is no specific study to test the impact of metric choice on biogeographical regionalization. We herein ap...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2019.12.003 |
Sumario: | For a quantitative biogeographical regionalization, the choice of an appropriate dissimilarity index to measure pairwise distances is crucial. Several different metrics have been used, but there is no specific study to test the impact of metric choice on biogeographical regionalization. We herein applied a hierarchical cluster analysis on the mean nearest taxon distance (MNTD) and the phylogenetic turnover component of the Sørensen dissimilarity index (pβ(sim)) pairwise distances to generate two schemes of phylogenetic regionalization of the Chinese flora, and then evaluated the effect of metric choice. Floristic regionalization based on MNTD was influenced by richness differences, but regionalization based on pβ(sim) can clearly reflect the evolutionary history of the Chinese flora. We provided a brief description of the five regions identified by pβ(sim), and the regionalization can help develop strategies to effectively conserve the taxa and floristic regions with different origins and evolutionary histories. |
---|