Cargando…

EU economic integration agreements, Brexit and trade

The effects of regionalism on trade have been extensively evaluated within a gravity model framework. With the expected exit of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU), the prospect of regional disintegration has brought about a new impetus to studying trade policy effects. Using actual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stack, Marie M., Bliss, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195620/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10290-020-00379-x
_version_ 1783528572682502144
author Stack, Marie M.
Bliss, Martin
author_facet Stack, Marie M.
Bliss, Martin
author_sort Stack, Marie M.
collection PubMed
description The effects of regionalism on trade have been extensively evaluated within a gravity model framework. With the expected exit of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU), the prospect of regional disintegration has brought about a new impetus to studying trade policy effects. Using actual and forecast data for a panel of bilateral imports between the EU15 and the rest of the world, this paper examines the trade effects of EU economic integration agreements (EIAs), their evolution over time and the related counterfactual Brexit trade policy scenarios. Distinct trade effects are obtained for the EU trade related agreements; positive, significant and of similar magnitude for the EU and free trade agreement (FTA) coefficients, but negative and significant (and smaller in magnitude) for the regional economic partnership agreements (EPAs). The subperiod results suggest the positive coefficients of EU and FTA membership tend to diminish over time, implying earlier membership of EIAs came with greater trade benefits. Finally, in generating the predicted values for the trade effects of three alternative counterfactual Brexit scenarios (hard Brexit, hard Brexit plus, global Britain), the findings suggest an asymmetric effect depending on the perspective of the UK versus the EU. Whereas the UK’s trade would decline substantially with all three country groups (the EU, the FTAs and regional EPAs) and rise substantially with the rest of the world, only minor percentage changes are predicted for EU bilateral trade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7195620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71956202020-05-02 EU economic integration agreements, Brexit and trade Stack, Marie M. Bliss, Martin Rev World Econ Original Paper The effects of regionalism on trade have been extensively evaluated within a gravity model framework. With the expected exit of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU), the prospect of regional disintegration has brought about a new impetus to studying trade policy effects. Using actual and forecast data for a panel of bilateral imports between the EU15 and the rest of the world, this paper examines the trade effects of EU economic integration agreements (EIAs), their evolution over time and the related counterfactual Brexit trade policy scenarios. Distinct trade effects are obtained for the EU trade related agreements; positive, significant and of similar magnitude for the EU and free trade agreement (FTA) coefficients, but negative and significant (and smaller in magnitude) for the regional economic partnership agreements (EPAs). The subperiod results suggest the positive coefficients of EU and FTA membership tend to diminish over time, implying earlier membership of EIAs came with greater trade benefits. Finally, in generating the predicted values for the trade effects of three alternative counterfactual Brexit scenarios (hard Brexit, hard Brexit plus, global Britain), the findings suggest an asymmetric effect depending on the perspective of the UK versus the EU. Whereas the UK’s trade would decline substantially with all three country groups (the EU, the FTAs and regional EPAs) and rise substantially with the rest of the world, only minor percentage changes are predicted for EU bilateral trade. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7195620/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10290-020-00379-x Text en © Kiel Institute 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Stack, Marie M.
Bliss, Martin
EU economic integration agreements, Brexit and trade
title EU economic integration agreements, Brexit and trade
title_full EU economic integration agreements, Brexit and trade
title_fullStr EU economic integration agreements, Brexit and trade
title_full_unstemmed EU economic integration agreements, Brexit and trade
title_short EU economic integration agreements, Brexit and trade
title_sort eu economic integration agreements, brexit and trade
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195620/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10290-020-00379-x
work_keys_str_mv AT stackmariem eueconomicintegrationagreementsbrexitandtrade
AT blissmartin eueconomicintegrationagreementsbrexitandtrade