Cargando…

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of the primary surgery (PS) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the initial treatment for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with stages III–IV HPSCC from four tertia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Yao-Te, Chen, Wen-Cheng, Chien, Chih-Yen, Hsu, Cheng-Ming, Lee, Yi-Chan, Tsai, Ming-Shao, Lin, Meng-Hung, Lai, Chia-Hsuan, Chang, Kai-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32357934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01866-z
_version_ 1783528604520415232
author Tsai, Yao-Te
Chen, Wen-Cheng
Chien, Chih-Yen
Hsu, Cheng-Ming
Lee, Yi-Chan
Tsai, Ming-Shao
Lin, Meng-Hung
Lai, Chia-Hsuan
Chang, Kai-Ping
author_facet Tsai, Yao-Te
Chen, Wen-Cheng
Chien, Chih-Yen
Hsu, Cheng-Ming
Lee, Yi-Chan
Tsai, Ming-Shao
Lin, Meng-Hung
Lai, Chia-Hsuan
Chang, Kai-Ping
author_sort Tsai, Yao-Te
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of the primary surgery (PS) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the initial treatment for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with stages III–IV HPSCC from four tertiary referral centers consecutively enrolled from 2003 to 2012; of them, 213 (32.6%) and 439 (67.4%) had received PS and CCRT as their primary treatments, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression models. RESULTS: In patients undergoing PS and CCRT, OS rates were 45.0% and 33.1% (p < 0.001), respectively, and DFS rates were 36.2% and 28.9% (p = 0.003), respectively. In subgroup analysis, in patients with stage IVA HPSCC, PS was associated with higher OS rate (p = 0.002), particularly in those with T4 or N2 classification (p = 0.021 and 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that stage IVA HPSCC, stage IVB HPSCC, and CCRT were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS rate (p = 0.004, < 0.001, and 0.014, respectively). Furthermore, in patients with stage IVA HPSCC aged ≥ 65 years and with N2 classification, CCRT was significantly associated with lower OS rates than was PS (p = 0.027 and 0.010, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HPSCC, PS was significantly associated with better prognosis than CCRT. PS could be a favorable primary treatment modality for the management of patients with stage IVA HPSCC, particularly those aged ≥ 65 years and with T4 and N2 classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7195763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71957632020-05-06 Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Tsai, Yao-Te Chen, Wen-Cheng Chien, Chih-Yen Hsu, Cheng-Ming Lee, Yi-Chan Tsai, Ming-Shao Lin, Meng-Hung Lai, Chia-Hsuan Chang, Kai-Ping World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of the primary surgery (PS) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the initial treatment for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with stages III–IV HPSCC from four tertiary referral centers consecutively enrolled from 2003 to 2012; of them, 213 (32.6%) and 439 (67.4%) had received PS and CCRT as their primary treatments, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression models. RESULTS: In patients undergoing PS and CCRT, OS rates were 45.0% and 33.1% (p < 0.001), respectively, and DFS rates were 36.2% and 28.9% (p = 0.003), respectively. In subgroup analysis, in patients with stage IVA HPSCC, PS was associated with higher OS rate (p = 0.002), particularly in those with T4 or N2 classification (p = 0.021 and 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that stage IVA HPSCC, stage IVB HPSCC, and CCRT were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS rate (p = 0.004, < 0.001, and 0.014, respectively). Furthermore, in patients with stage IVA HPSCC aged ≥ 65 years and with N2 classification, CCRT was significantly associated with lower OS rates than was PS (p = 0.027 and 0.010, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HPSCC, PS was significantly associated with better prognosis than CCRT. PS could be a favorable primary treatment modality for the management of patients with stage IVA HPSCC, particularly those aged ≥ 65 years and with T4 and N2 classification. BioMed Central 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7195763/ /pubmed/32357934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01866-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tsai, Yao-Te
Chen, Wen-Cheng
Chien, Chih-Yen
Hsu, Cheng-Ming
Lee, Yi-Chan
Tsai, Ming-Shao
Lin, Meng-Hung
Lai, Chia-Hsuan
Chang, Kai-Ping
Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort treatment patterns and survival outcomes of advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32357934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01866-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaiyaote treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT chenwencheng treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT chienchihyen treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT hsuchengming treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT leeyichan treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT tsaimingshao treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT linmenghung treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT laichiahsuan treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT changkaiping treatmentpatternsandsurvivaloutcomesofadvancedhypopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinoma