Cargando…
Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences
BACKGROUND: By participating in priority-setting activities in research, patients and members of the public help ensure that important questions are incorporated into future research agendas. Surveys, focus groups, and online crowdsourcing are increasingly used to obtain input, yet little is known a...
Autores principales: | Lavallee, Danielle C., Lawrence, Sarah O., Avins, Andrew L., Nerenz, David R., Edwards, Todd C., Patrick, Donald L., Bauer, Zoya, Truitt, Anjali R., Monsell, Sarah E., Scott, Mary R., Jarvik, Jeffrey G. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32377376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00196-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Study of Methods for Assessing Research Topic Elicitation and pRioritization (SMARTER): Study Protocol to Compare Qualitative Research Methods and Advance Patient Engagement in Research
por: Lavallee, Danielle C, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Crowdsourcing in Research Prioritization for Back Pain: Cross-Sectional Surveys
por: Bartek, Matthew A, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Study Protocol- Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS): a double-blind randomized controlled trial of epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis among older adults
por: Friedly, Janna L, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Study protocol: The back pain outcomes using longitudinal data (BOLD) registry
por: Jarvik, Jeffrey G, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Back pain in seniors: the Back pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) cohort baseline data
por: Jarvik, Jeffrey G, et al.
Publicado: (2014)