Cargando…
Validation of RESP and PRESERVE score for ARDS patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA)
BACKGROUND: RESP score and PRESERVE score have been validated for veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in severe ARDS to assume individual mortality risk. ARDS patients with low-flow Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal, especially pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist, have also a high mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32359363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01010-0 |
_version_ | 1783528612365860864 |
---|---|
author | Petran, Jan Muelly, Thorsten Dembinski, Rolf Steuer, Niklas Arens, Jutta Marx, Gernot Kopp, Ruedger |
author_facet | Petran, Jan Muelly, Thorsten Dembinski, Rolf Steuer, Niklas Arens, Jutta Marx, Gernot Kopp, Ruedger |
author_sort | Petran, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: RESP score and PRESERVE score have been validated for veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in severe ARDS to assume individual mortality risk. ARDS patients with low-flow Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal, especially pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist, have also a high mortality rate, but there are no validated specific or general outcome scores. This retrospective study tested whether these established specific risk scores can be validated for pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist in ARDS patients in comparison to a general organ dysfunction score, the SOFA score. METHODS: In a retrospective single center cohort study we calculated and evaluated RESP, PRESERVE, and SOFA score for 73 ARDS patients with pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist treated between 2002 and 2016 using the XENIOS iLA Membrane Ventilator. Six patients had a mild, 40 a moderate and 27 a severe ARDS according to the Berlin criteria. Demographic data and hospital mortality as well as ventilator settings, hemodynamic parameters, and blood gas measurement before and during extracorporeal therapy were recorded. RESULTS: Pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist of mechanical ventilated ARDS patients resulted in an optimized lung protective ventilation, significant reduction of P(aCO2), and compensation of acidosis. Scoring showed a mean score of alive versus deceased patients of 3 ± 1 versus − 1 ± 1 for RESP (p < 0.01), 3 ± 0 versus 6 ± 0 for PRESERVE (p < 0.05) and 8 ± 1 versus 10 ± 1 for SOFA (p < 0.05). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.89, p < 0.01) for RESP score, 0.80 (95% CI 0.70–0.90, p < 0.0001) for PRESERVE score and 0.66 (95% CI 0.53–0.79, p < 0.05) for SOFA score. CONCLUSIONS: RESP and PRESERVE scores were superior to SOFA, as non-specific critical care score. Although scores were developed for veno-venous ECMO, we could validate RESP and PRESERVE score for pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist. In conclusion, RESP and PRESERVE score are suitable to estimate mortality risk of ARDS patients with an arterio-venous pumpless Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7195797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71957972020-05-02 Validation of RESP and PRESERVE score for ARDS patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) Petran, Jan Muelly, Thorsten Dembinski, Rolf Steuer, Niklas Arens, Jutta Marx, Gernot Kopp, Ruedger BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: RESP score and PRESERVE score have been validated for veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in severe ARDS to assume individual mortality risk. ARDS patients with low-flow Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal, especially pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist, have also a high mortality rate, but there are no validated specific or general outcome scores. This retrospective study tested whether these established specific risk scores can be validated for pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist in ARDS patients in comparison to a general organ dysfunction score, the SOFA score. METHODS: In a retrospective single center cohort study we calculated and evaluated RESP, PRESERVE, and SOFA score for 73 ARDS patients with pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist treated between 2002 and 2016 using the XENIOS iLA Membrane Ventilator. Six patients had a mild, 40 a moderate and 27 a severe ARDS according to the Berlin criteria. Demographic data and hospital mortality as well as ventilator settings, hemodynamic parameters, and blood gas measurement before and during extracorporeal therapy were recorded. RESULTS: Pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist of mechanical ventilated ARDS patients resulted in an optimized lung protective ventilation, significant reduction of P(aCO2), and compensation of acidosis. Scoring showed a mean score of alive versus deceased patients of 3 ± 1 versus − 1 ± 1 for RESP (p < 0.01), 3 ± 0 versus 6 ± 0 for PRESERVE (p < 0.05) and 8 ± 1 versus 10 ± 1 for SOFA (p < 0.05). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.89, p < 0.01) for RESP score, 0.80 (95% CI 0.70–0.90, p < 0.0001) for PRESERVE score and 0.66 (95% CI 0.53–0.79, p < 0.05) for SOFA score. CONCLUSIONS: RESP and PRESERVE scores were superior to SOFA, as non-specific critical care score. Although scores were developed for veno-venous ECMO, we could validate RESP and PRESERVE score for pumpless Extracorporeal Lung Assist. In conclusion, RESP and PRESERVE score are suitable to estimate mortality risk of ARDS patients with an arterio-venous pumpless Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal. BioMed Central 2020-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7195797/ /pubmed/32359363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01010-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Petran, Jan Muelly, Thorsten Dembinski, Rolf Steuer, Niklas Arens, Jutta Marx, Gernot Kopp, Ruedger Validation of RESP and PRESERVE score for ARDS patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) |
title | Validation of RESP and PRESERVE score for ARDS patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) |
title_full | Validation of RESP and PRESERVE score for ARDS patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) |
title_fullStr | Validation of RESP and PRESERVE score for ARDS patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of RESP and PRESERVE score for ARDS patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) |
title_short | Validation of RESP and PRESERVE score for ARDS patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pECLA) |
title_sort | validation of resp and preserve score for ards patients with pumpless extracorporeal lung assist (pecla) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32359363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01010-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petranjan validationofrespandpreservescoreforardspatientswithpumplessextracorporeallungassistpecla AT muellythorsten validationofrespandpreservescoreforardspatientswithpumplessextracorporeallungassistpecla AT dembinskirolf validationofrespandpreservescoreforardspatientswithpumplessextracorporeallungassistpecla AT steuerniklas validationofrespandpreservescoreforardspatientswithpumplessextracorporeallungassistpecla AT arensjutta validationofrespandpreservescoreforardspatientswithpumplessextracorporeallungassistpecla AT marxgernot validationofrespandpreservescoreforardspatientswithpumplessextracorporeallungassistpecla AT koppruedger validationofrespandpreservescoreforardspatientswithpumplessextracorporeallungassistpecla |