Cargando…

Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013–2017

BACKGROUND: Access to bariatric care varies across regions, ethnic, and racial groups. Some of these variations may be due to insurance status or socioeconomic status. There are also regional and state variations in access to metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). The Texas Inpatient Public Use Data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clapp, Benjamin, Barrientes, Ashtyn, Dodoo, Christopher, Harper, Brittany, Liggett, Evan, Cutshall, Michael, Tyroch, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425480
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00016
_version_ 1783528614688456704
author Clapp, Benjamin
Barrientes, Ashtyn
Dodoo, Christopher
Harper, Brittany
Liggett, Evan
Cutshall, Michael
Tyroch, Alan
author_facet Clapp, Benjamin
Barrientes, Ashtyn
Dodoo, Christopher
Harper, Brittany
Liggett, Evan
Cutshall, Michael
Tyroch, Alan
author_sort Clapp, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Access to bariatric care varies across regions, ethnic, and racial groups. Some of these variations may be due to insurance status or socioeconomic status. There are also regional and state variations in access to metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). The Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (IPUDF) and Texas Outpatient Public Use Data File is a state-mandated database that collects information on demographics, procedures, diagnoses, and cost on almost all admissions in Texas. We used them to examine racial disparities in MBS over a 5-y period. METHODS: The IPUDF and Texas Outpatient Public Use Data File were examined from the years 2013 through, 2017. We included all patients undergoing a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy and examined the demographics of these patients. Race and ethnicity are reported separately. We used U.S. Census Bureau statistics and the Texas Department of State Health Services statistics to determine the crude (unadjusted) and adjusted procedure rates of patients undergoing MBS. RESULTS: In the IUPUDF, the crude unadjusted procedure rate for blacks undergoing MBS was 7.29 per 10,000 population followed by 6.85 per 10,000 for non-Hispanic whites. Hispanics had the lowest rate at 3.20 per 10,000. When adjusted for sex, obesity, age, and race, blacks still had a higher rate of access followed by whites and then Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: There are disparities to access for bariatric surgery in Texas. Blacks have the greatest access followed by whites. Hispanics have the lowest procedure rate per population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7195817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71958172020-05-18 Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013–2017 Clapp, Benjamin Barrientes, Ashtyn Dodoo, Christopher Harper, Brittany Liggett, Evan Cutshall, Michael Tyroch, Alan JSLS Research Article BACKGROUND: Access to bariatric care varies across regions, ethnic, and racial groups. Some of these variations may be due to insurance status or socioeconomic status. There are also regional and state variations in access to metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). The Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (IPUDF) and Texas Outpatient Public Use Data File is a state-mandated database that collects information on demographics, procedures, diagnoses, and cost on almost all admissions in Texas. We used them to examine racial disparities in MBS over a 5-y period. METHODS: The IPUDF and Texas Outpatient Public Use Data File were examined from the years 2013 through, 2017. We included all patients undergoing a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy and examined the demographics of these patients. Race and ethnicity are reported separately. We used U.S. Census Bureau statistics and the Texas Department of State Health Services statistics to determine the crude (unadjusted) and adjusted procedure rates of patients undergoing MBS. RESULTS: In the IUPUDF, the crude unadjusted procedure rate for blacks undergoing MBS was 7.29 per 10,000 population followed by 6.85 per 10,000 for non-Hispanic whites. Hispanics had the lowest rate at 3.20 per 10,000. When adjusted for sex, obesity, age, and race, blacks still had a higher rate of access followed by whites and then Hispanics. CONCLUSIONS: There are disparities to access for bariatric surgery in Texas. Blacks have the greatest access followed by whites. Hispanics have the lowest procedure rate per population. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7195817/ /pubmed/32425480 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00016 Text en © 2020 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Research Article
Clapp, Benjamin
Barrientes, Ashtyn
Dodoo, Christopher
Harper, Brittany
Liggett, Evan
Cutshall, Michael
Tyroch, Alan
Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013–2017
title Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013–2017
title_full Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013–2017
title_fullStr Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013–2017
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013–2017
title_short Disparities in Access to Bariatric Surgery in Texas 2013–2017
title_sort disparities in access to bariatric surgery in texas 2013–2017
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425480
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00016
work_keys_str_mv AT clappbenjamin disparitiesinaccesstobariatricsurgeryintexas20132017
AT barrientesashtyn disparitiesinaccesstobariatricsurgeryintexas20132017
AT dodoochristopher disparitiesinaccesstobariatricsurgeryintexas20132017
AT harperbrittany disparitiesinaccesstobariatricsurgeryintexas20132017
AT liggettevan disparitiesinaccesstobariatricsurgeryintexas20132017
AT cutshallmichael disparitiesinaccesstobariatricsurgeryintexas20132017
AT tyrochalan disparitiesinaccesstobariatricsurgeryintexas20132017