Cargando…

Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test whether Amflow® (a newly designed portable ventilation feedback device) can assist rescuers in delivering target tidal volume (V(T)) and respiration rate (RR) during self-inflating bag (SB) ventilations in various clinical scenarios. METHOD: This was a si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jong Won, Park, Sang O, Lee, Kyeong Ryong, Hong, Dae Young, Baek, Kwang Je
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7196155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32377436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5296519
_version_ 1783528665776128000
author Kim, Jong Won
Park, Sang O
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
Hong, Dae Young
Baek, Kwang Je
author_facet Kim, Jong Won
Park, Sang O
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
Hong, Dae Young
Baek, Kwang Je
author_sort Kim, Jong Won
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test whether Amflow® (a newly designed portable ventilation feedback device) can assist rescuers in delivering target tidal volume (V(T)) and respiration rate (RR) during self-inflating bag (SB) ventilations in various clinical scenarios. METHOD: This was a simulation study with a prospective cross-over design. A total of 40 trained participants who underwent training for SB ventilation were recruited. Using a SB with or without Amflow® alternately, participants delivered ventilations to test lungs connected to a gas flow analyser in each of three different scenarios: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 315–385 ml ranges for 350 ml target V(T), with 20 breaths/min); cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; 450–550 ml ranges for 500 ml target V(T) with 10 breaths/min); and adult head trauma (630–770 ml ranges for 700 ml target V(T) with 15 breaths/min). RESULTS: The feedback group (SB with Amflow®) demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of delivering the appropriate V(T) ranges than the no-feedback group for both ARDS (58.6% versus 23.5%, respectively) and CPR (85.4% versus 41.0%, respectively) (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the percentage of delivering the appropriate V(T) ranges in head trauma patients (65.9% versus 68.3%, respectively; p=0.092). In all three scenarios, a higher percentage of target RR delivered was achieved in the feedback group (88.3%, 99.2%, and 96.3%, respectively) compared with the no-feedback group (5.8%, 12.5%, and 10.0%, respectively) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Amflow® device could be useful for rescuers in delivering SB ventilation with appropriate V(T) and RR simultaneously in various critical situations, except for clinical cases that demand greater delivered V(T).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7196155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71961552020-05-06 Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study Kim, Jong Won Park, Sang O Lee, Kyeong Ryong Hong, Dae Young Baek, Kwang Je Emerg Med Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test whether Amflow® (a newly designed portable ventilation feedback device) can assist rescuers in delivering target tidal volume (V(T)) and respiration rate (RR) during self-inflating bag (SB) ventilations in various clinical scenarios. METHOD: This was a simulation study with a prospective cross-over design. A total of 40 trained participants who underwent training for SB ventilation were recruited. Using a SB with or without Amflow® alternately, participants delivered ventilations to test lungs connected to a gas flow analyser in each of three different scenarios: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 315–385 ml ranges for 350 ml target V(T), with 20 breaths/min); cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; 450–550 ml ranges for 500 ml target V(T) with 10 breaths/min); and adult head trauma (630–770 ml ranges for 700 ml target V(T) with 15 breaths/min). RESULTS: The feedback group (SB with Amflow®) demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of delivering the appropriate V(T) ranges than the no-feedback group for both ARDS (58.6% versus 23.5%, respectively) and CPR (85.4% versus 41.0%, respectively) (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the percentage of delivering the appropriate V(T) ranges in head trauma patients (65.9% versus 68.3%, respectively; p=0.092). In all three scenarios, a higher percentage of target RR delivered was achieved in the feedback group (88.3%, 99.2%, and 96.3%, respectively) compared with the no-feedback group (5.8%, 12.5%, and 10.0%, respectively) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Amflow® device could be useful for rescuers in delivering SB ventilation with appropriate V(T) and RR simultaneously in various critical situations, except for clinical cases that demand greater delivered V(T). Hindawi 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7196155/ /pubmed/32377436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5296519 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jong Won Kim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Jong Won
Park, Sang O
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
Hong, Dae Young
Baek, Kwang Je
Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study
title Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study
title_full Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study
title_fullStr Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study
title_short Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study
title_sort efficacy of amflow®, a real-time-portable feedback device for delivering appropriate ventilation in critically ill patients: a randomised, controlled, cross-over simulation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7196155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32377436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5296519
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjongwon efficacyofamflowarealtimeportablefeedbackdevicefordeliveringappropriateventilationincriticallyillpatientsarandomisedcontrolledcrossoversimulationstudy
AT parksango efficacyofamflowarealtimeportablefeedbackdevicefordeliveringappropriateventilationincriticallyillpatientsarandomisedcontrolledcrossoversimulationstudy
AT leekyeongryong efficacyofamflowarealtimeportablefeedbackdevicefordeliveringappropriateventilationincriticallyillpatientsarandomisedcontrolledcrossoversimulationstudy
AT hongdaeyoung efficacyofamflowarealtimeportablefeedbackdevicefordeliveringappropriateventilationincriticallyillpatientsarandomisedcontrolledcrossoversimulationstudy
AT baekkwangje efficacyofamflowarealtimeportablefeedbackdevicefordeliveringappropriateventilationincriticallyillpatientsarandomisedcontrolledcrossoversimulationstudy