Cargando…

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of SARC-F and Its Two Modified Versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland

PURPOSE: Older adults should be routinely screened for sarcopenia, which threatens healthy, independent aging. The most popular screening tool is the SARC-F questionnaire. As its sensitivity is unsatisfactory, two modified versions of the questionnaire have been published: SARC-CalF (including calf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krzymińska-Siemaszko, Roma, Deskur-Śmielecka, Ewa, Kaluźniak-Szymanowska, Aleksandra, Lewandowicz, Marta, Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7196242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425513
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S250508
_version_ 1783528685232455680
author Krzymińska-Siemaszko, Roma
Deskur-Śmielecka, Ewa
Kaluźniak-Szymanowska, Aleksandra
Lewandowicz, Marta
Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna
author_facet Krzymińska-Siemaszko, Roma
Deskur-Śmielecka, Ewa
Kaluźniak-Szymanowska, Aleksandra
Lewandowicz, Marta
Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna
author_sort Krzymińska-Siemaszko, Roma
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Older adults should be routinely screened for sarcopenia, which threatens healthy, independent aging. The most popular screening tool is the SARC-F questionnaire. As its sensitivity is unsatisfactory, two modified versions of the questionnaire have been published: SARC-CalF (including calf circumference as an additional item) and SARC-F+EBM (assessing additionally age and Body Mass Index). The diagnostic performance of the three versions of the questionnaire has not been compared. The analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic value of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-F+EBM questionnaires, and to compare their psychometric properties against two reference standards of sarcopenia diagnosis, ie, EWGSOP1 and modified EWGSOP2 criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed the sensitivity/specificity analysis and compared the overall diagnostic accuracy of SARC-F, SARC-CalF (31cm) (cut-off point 31 cm for both genders), SARC-CalF (33/34cm) (cut-off points: 33 cm for women and 34 cm for men), and SARC-F+EBM in 115 community-dwelling volunteers aged ≥ 65 yrs from Poland. RESULTS: Depending on the version of the SARC-F questionnaire used, from 10.4% [SARC-CalF (31cm)] to 33.0% (SARC-F+EBM) were identified as having an increased risk of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was identified in 17.4% by the EWGSOP1 criteria and in 13.9% by the modified EWGSOP2 criteria. With respect to the two reference standards used, the sensitivity of SARC-F, SARC-CalF (31cm), SARC-CalF (33/34cm), and SARC-F+EBM ranged 30.0–37.5%, 35.0–37.5%, 60.0–62.5%, 55.0% (the same value for both reference standards), respectively. The specificity ranged 85.3–85.9%, 93.9–94.7%, 88.4–86.9%, 70.7–71.6%, respectively. The AUC of SARC-F, SARC-CalF (31cm), SARC-CalF (33/34cm) and SARC-F+EBM ranged 0.644–0.693, 0.737–0.783, 0.767–0.804, 0.714–0.715, respectively. CONCLUSION: The modified versions of SARC-F have better diagnostic performance as compared to the original questionnaire. Since an ideal screening tool should have reasonably high sensitivity and specificity, and an AUC value above 0.7, the SARC-CalF (33/34cm) seems to be the best screening tool for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7196242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71962422020-05-18 Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of SARC-F and Its Two Modified Versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland Krzymińska-Siemaszko, Roma Deskur-Śmielecka, Ewa Kaluźniak-Szymanowska, Aleksandra Lewandowicz, Marta Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: Older adults should be routinely screened for sarcopenia, which threatens healthy, independent aging. The most popular screening tool is the SARC-F questionnaire. As its sensitivity is unsatisfactory, two modified versions of the questionnaire have been published: SARC-CalF (including calf circumference as an additional item) and SARC-F+EBM (assessing additionally age and Body Mass Index). The diagnostic performance of the three versions of the questionnaire has not been compared. The analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic value of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-F+EBM questionnaires, and to compare their psychometric properties against two reference standards of sarcopenia diagnosis, ie, EWGSOP1 and modified EWGSOP2 criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed the sensitivity/specificity analysis and compared the overall diagnostic accuracy of SARC-F, SARC-CalF (31cm) (cut-off point 31 cm for both genders), SARC-CalF (33/34cm) (cut-off points: 33 cm for women and 34 cm for men), and SARC-F+EBM in 115 community-dwelling volunteers aged ≥ 65 yrs from Poland. RESULTS: Depending on the version of the SARC-F questionnaire used, from 10.4% [SARC-CalF (31cm)] to 33.0% (SARC-F+EBM) were identified as having an increased risk of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was identified in 17.4% by the EWGSOP1 criteria and in 13.9% by the modified EWGSOP2 criteria. With respect to the two reference standards used, the sensitivity of SARC-F, SARC-CalF (31cm), SARC-CalF (33/34cm), and SARC-F+EBM ranged 30.0–37.5%, 35.0–37.5%, 60.0–62.5%, 55.0% (the same value for both reference standards), respectively. The specificity ranged 85.3–85.9%, 93.9–94.7%, 88.4–86.9%, 70.7–71.6%, respectively. The AUC of SARC-F, SARC-CalF (31cm), SARC-CalF (33/34cm) and SARC-F+EBM ranged 0.644–0.693, 0.737–0.783, 0.767–0.804, 0.714–0.715, respectively. CONCLUSION: The modified versions of SARC-F have better diagnostic performance as compared to the original questionnaire. Since an ideal screening tool should have reasonably high sensitivity and specificity, and an AUC value above 0.7, the SARC-CalF (33/34cm) seems to be the best screening tool for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults. Dove 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7196242/ /pubmed/32425513 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S250508 Text en © 2020 Krzymińska-Siemaszko et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Krzymińska-Siemaszko, Roma
Deskur-Śmielecka, Ewa
Kaluźniak-Szymanowska, Aleksandra
Lewandowicz, Marta
Wieczorowska-Tobis, Katarzyna
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of SARC-F and Its Two Modified Versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland
title Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of SARC-F and Its Two Modified Versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland
title_full Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of SARC-F and Its Two Modified Versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland
title_fullStr Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of SARC-F and Its Two Modified Versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of SARC-F and Its Two Modified Versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland
title_short Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of SARC-F and Its Two Modified Versions (SARC-CalF and SARC-F+EBM) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults from Poland
title_sort comparison of diagnostic performance of sarc-f and its two modified versions (sarc-calf and sarc-f+ebm) in community-dwelling older adults from poland
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7196242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32425513
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S250508
work_keys_str_mv AT krzyminskasiemaszkoroma comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofsarcfanditstwomodifiedversionssarccalfandsarcfebmincommunitydwellingolderadultsfrompoland
AT deskursmieleckaewa comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofsarcfanditstwomodifiedversionssarccalfandsarcfebmincommunitydwellingolderadultsfrompoland
AT kaluzniakszymanowskaaleksandra comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofsarcfanditstwomodifiedversionssarccalfandsarcfebmincommunitydwellingolderadultsfrompoland
AT lewandowiczmarta comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofsarcfanditstwomodifiedversionssarccalfandsarcfebmincommunitydwellingolderadultsfrompoland
AT wieczorowskatobiskatarzyna comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofsarcfanditstwomodifiedversionssarccalfandsarcfebmincommunitydwellingolderadultsfrompoland