Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses

PURPOSE: Several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer (LC) or pleural tumours (PT). This review article...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lococo, Filippo, Muoio, Barbara, Chiappetta, Marco, Nachira, Dania, Petracca Ciavarella, Leonardo, Margaritora, Stefano, Treglia, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7196984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32405280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5282698
_version_ 1783528799333253120
author Lococo, Filippo
Muoio, Barbara
Chiappetta, Marco
Nachira, Dania
Petracca Ciavarella, Leonardo
Margaritora, Stefano
Treglia, Giorgio
author_facet Lococo, Filippo
Muoio, Barbara
Chiappetta, Marco
Nachira, Dania
Petracca Ciavarella, Leonardo
Margaritora, Stefano
Treglia, Giorgio
author_sort Lococo, Filippo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer (LC) or pleural tumours (PT). This review article aims at providing an overview on the recent evidence-based data in this setting. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library database from January 2010 through March 2020 about the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious LC or PT was performed. This combination of keywords was used: (A) “PET” OR “positron emission tomography” AND (B) “lung” OR “pulmonary” OR “pleur(∗)” AND (C) meta-analysis. Only meta-analyses on PET or PET/CT in patients with suspicious LC or PT were selected. RESULTS: We have summarized the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) and other radiotracers taking into account 17 meta-analyses. Evidence-based data demonstrated a good diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) or pleural lesions with overall higher sensitivity than specificity. Evidence-based data do not support the routine use of dual time point (DTP) (18)F-FDG PET/CT or fluorine-18 fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of SPNs. Even if (18)F-FDG PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity as a selective screening modality for LC, its role in this setting remains unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based data about the diagnostic performance of PET/CT with different radiotracers for suspicious LC or PT are increasing, with good diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT. More prospective multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7196984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71969842020-05-13 Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses Lococo, Filippo Muoio, Barbara Chiappetta, Marco Nachira, Dania Petracca Ciavarella, Leonardo Margaritora, Stefano Treglia, Giorgio Contrast Media Mol Imaging Review Article PURPOSE: Several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer (LC) or pleural tumours (PT). This review article aims at providing an overview on the recent evidence-based data in this setting. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library database from January 2010 through March 2020 about the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious LC or PT was performed. This combination of keywords was used: (A) “PET” OR “positron emission tomography” AND (B) “lung” OR “pulmonary” OR “pleur(∗)” AND (C) meta-analysis. Only meta-analyses on PET or PET/CT in patients with suspicious LC or PT were selected. RESULTS: We have summarized the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) and other radiotracers taking into account 17 meta-analyses. Evidence-based data demonstrated a good diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) or pleural lesions with overall higher sensitivity than specificity. Evidence-based data do not support the routine use of dual time point (DTP) (18)F-FDG PET/CT or fluorine-18 fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of SPNs. Even if (18)F-FDG PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity as a selective screening modality for LC, its role in this setting remains unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based data about the diagnostic performance of PET/CT with different radiotracers for suspicious LC or PT are increasing, with good diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT. More prospective multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted. Hindawi 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7196984/ /pubmed/32405280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5282698 Text en Copyright © 2020 Filippo Lococo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lococo, Filippo
Muoio, Barbara
Chiappetta, Marco
Nachira, Dania
Petracca Ciavarella, Leonardo
Margaritora, Stefano
Treglia, Giorgio
Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses
title Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses
title_full Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses
title_short Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses
title_sort diagnostic performance of pet or pet/ct with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer or pleural tumours according to published meta-analyses
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7196984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32405280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5282698
work_keys_str_mv AT lococofilippo diagnosticperformanceofpetorpetctwithdifferentradiotracersinpatientswithsuspiciouslungcancerorpleuraltumoursaccordingtopublishedmetaanalyses
AT muoiobarbara diagnosticperformanceofpetorpetctwithdifferentradiotracersinpatientswithsuspiciouslungcancerorpleuraltumoursaccordingtopublishedmetaanalyses
AT chiappettamarco diagnosticperformanceofpetorpetctwithdifferentradiotracersinpatientswithsuspiciouslungcancerorpleuraltumoursaccordingtopublishedmetaanalyses
AT nachiradania diagnosticperformanceofpetorpetctwithdifferentradiotracersinpatientswithsuspiciouslungcancerorpleuraltumoursaccordingtopublishedmetaanalyses
AT petraccaciavarellaleonardo diagnosticperformanceofpetorpetctwithdifferentradiotracersinpatientswithsuspiciouslungcancerorpleuraltumoursaccordingtopublishedmetaanalyses
AT margaritorastefano diagnosticperformanceofpetorpetctwithdifferentradiotracersinpatientswithsuspiciouslungcancerorpleuraltumoursaccordingtopublishedmetaanalyses
AT tregliagiorgio diagnosticperformanceofpetorpetctwithdifferentradiotracersinpatientswithsuspiciouslungcancerorpleuraltumoursaccordingtopublishedmetaanalyses