Cargando…
Predicting the Photoelectron Spectra of Quasi Octahedral Al(6)Mo(‐) Cluster
We have recently developed a computational methodology to separate the effects of size, composition, symmetry and fluxionality in explaining the experimental photoelectron spectra of mixed‐metal clusters. This methodology was successfully applied first in explaining the observed differences between...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/open.202000079 |
Sumario: | We have recently developed a computational methodology to separate the effects of size, composition, symmetry and fluxionality in explaining the experimental photoelectron spectra of mixed‐metal clusters. This methodology was successfully applied first in explaining the observed differences between the spectra of Al(13) (‐) and Al(12)Ni(‐) and more recently to explain the measured spectra of Al(n)Mo(‐), n=3–5,7 clusters. The combination of our approach and new synthesis techniques can be used to prepare cluster‐based materials with tunable properties. In this work we use the methodology to predict the spectrum of Al(6)Mo(‐). This system was chosen because its neutral counterpart is a perfect octahedron and it is distorted to a D(3d) symmetry and was not observed in the recent experiments. This high symmetry cluster bridges the less symmetric Al(5)Mo(‐) and Al(7)Mo(‐)structures.The measured spectra of Al(5)Mo(‐) has well defined peaks, while that of Al(7)Mo(‐)does not. This can be explained by the fluxionality of Al(7)Mo(‐), as at least 6 different structures lie within the range that can be reached by thermal effects. We predict that Al(6)Mo(‐) has well defined peaks, but some broadening is expected as there are two low‐lying isomers, one of D(3d) and the second of D(3h) symmetry that are only 0.052 eV apart. |
---|