Cargando…

What are innovations in peer review and editorial assessment for?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Halffman, Willem, Horbach, Serge P.J.M
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2020
Materias:	Editorial
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32362286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02004-4

Ejemplares similares

Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work
por: Horbach, Serge P. J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The changing forms and expectations of peer review
por: Horbach, S. P. J. M. ( Serge), et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Correction to: The changing forms and expectations of peer review
por: Horbach, S. P. J. M. (Serge), et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications
por: Horbach, S. P. J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models in scholarly peer review
por: Hosseini, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature
por: Horbach, Serge P. J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

On the Willingness to Report and the Consequences of Reporting Research Misconduct: The Role of Power Relations
por: Horbach, Serge P. J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

JID Innovations and Peer Review
por: Hall, Russell P.
Publicado: (2021)

Misidentified biomedical resources: Journal guidelines are not a quick fix
por: Hepkema, Wytske M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic
por: Horbach, Serge P J M
Publicado: (2021)

Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’
por: Horbach, S. P. J. M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Editorial priorities and timeliness of editorial assessment and peer review during the COVID-19 pandemic()
por: Sullivan, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effective Peer Review: Who, Where, or What?
por: Hall, Russell P.
Publicado: (2022)

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action
por: Ross-Hellauer, Tony, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
por: Hosseini, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Editorial: Peer review vs. open posting
Publicado: (2012)

Publisher Correction: Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
por: Hosseini, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices
por: Tijdink, Joeri K., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Editorial management: innovations and perspectives
por: Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci
Publicado: (2014)

Innovative studies, eloquent peer reviewing and cultured editing: Academic desires and tangible dreams of an editor
por: Bhaskar, S Bala, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Peering into peer-review at GigaScience
por: Edmunds, Scott C
Publicado: (2013)

Submission policy, peer-review and editorial board members: interesting conflicts and conflicts of interest
por: Søreide, Kjetil, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers
por: Chung, Kyu Jin
Publicado: (2017)

Innovative Strategies for Peer Review
por: Barroga, Edward
Publicado: (2020)

Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2021)

Comprehensive examination of the peer review process in academic medicine: Towards reaching unbiased decisions – Editorial
por: Fanfan, Dino, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Improving the quality of Peer Review and accelerating the peer review process
por: Jawaid, Shaukat Ali
Publicado: (2023)

Reviewing the peer review
por: Desai, Chetna
Publicado: (2008)

Peer Review at JGIM
por: Jackson, Jeffrey L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

What Did Your Peers Do to You in High School?
por: Yoo, Hee Jeong
Publicado: (2021)

Peer Review – Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity
por: Masic, Izet
Publicado: (2016)

Lead editorial: The need for greater perspective and innovation in epidemiology
por: Phillips, Carl V, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

The Importance of Peer Review
Publicado: (2013)

An introduction to peer review
por: Yaddanapudi, Lakshmi Narayana, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Incentivizing Peer Review
por: Kennedy, Ann Blair
Publicado: (2017)

Quality in peer review
Publicado: (2019)

Peer review and roles of the reviewer
por: Chung, Kyu Jin
Publicado: (2019)

Ethics of editorial and peer review
por: Mandal, Jharna, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Editorial behaviors in peer review
por: Wang, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

What Is A Good Editorial?
por: Singh, Ajai, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_93h7erdakldb1j896hvc8p8poe