Cargando…
Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions
BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo) and Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV-2) are two of the most significant infectious agents causing economic losses in the weaning to slaughter period. Due to their similar vaccination age, the objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of two already exist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00148-0 |
_version_ | 1783528819518341120 |
---|---|
author | Sibila, M. Guevara, G. Cuadrado, R. Pleguezuelos, P. Pérez, D. Pérez de Rozas, A. Huerta, E. Llorens, A. Valero, O. Pérez, M. López, C. Krejci, R. Segalés, J. |
author_facet | Sibila, M. Guevara, G. Cuadrado, R. Pleguezuelos, P. Pérez, D. Pérez de Rozas, A. Huerta, E. Llorens, A. Valero, O. Pérez, M. López, C. Krejci, R. Segalés, J. |
author_sort | Sibila, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo) and Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV-2) are two of the most significant infectious agents causing economic losses in the weaning to slaughter period. Due to their similar vaccination age, the objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of two already existing Mhyo (Hyogen®) and PCV-2 (Circovac®) vaccines when administered separately or combined (RTM) by means of Mhyo or PCV-2 experimental challenges. RESULTS: Seven groups of animals were included in the study, being three of them challenged with PCV-2, three with Mhyo and one composed of non-challenged, non-vaccinated pigs. Within each experimental challenge, non-vaccinated (NV) groups were compared with double vaccinated groups using the commercial products separated (VS) or combined (VC). Both vaccinated groups showed significant differences for most parameters measured regarding PCV-2 (serology, percentage of infected animals and viral load in tissues) and Mhyo (serology and gross lesions) when compared to NV groups. VS and VC offered similar results, being only significantly different the PCV-2 antibody values at different time points (higher in the VS group) of the study, although not at the termination day (21 days post-PCV-2 inoculation). CONCLUSION: The present study expands the knowledge on the possibility of using two separate Mhyo and PCV-2 commercial vaccines as a RTM product, which offered equivalent virological, immunological and pathological outcomes as compared to these vaccines when used by separate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7197127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71971272020-05-08 Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions Sibila, M. Guevara, G. Cuadrado, R. Pleguezuelos, P. Pérez, D. Pérez de Rozas, A. Huerta, E. Llorens, A. Valero, O. Pérez, M. López, C. Krejci, R. Segalés, J. Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhyo) and Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV-2) are two of the most significant infectious agents causing economic losses in the weaning to slaughter period. Due to their similar vaccination age, the objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of two already existing Mhyo (Hyogen®) and PCV-2 (Circovac®) vaccines when administered separately or combined (RTM) by means of Mhyo or PCV-2 experimental challenges. RESULTS: Seven groups of animals were included in the study, being three of them challenged with PCV-2, three with Mhyo and one composed of non-challenged, non-vaccinated pigs. Within each experimental challenge, non-vaccinated (NV) groups were compared with double vaccinated groups using the commercial products separated (VS) or combined (VC). Both vaccinated groups showed significant differences for most parameters measured regarding PCV-2 (serology, percentage of infected animals and viral load in tissues) and Mhyo (serology and gross lesions) when compared to NV groups. VS and VC offered similar results, being only significantly different the PCV-2 antibody values at different time points (higher in the VS group) of the study, although not at the termination day (21 days post-PCV-2 inoculation). CONCLUSION: The present study expands the knowledge on the possibility of using two separate Mhyo and PCV-2 commercial vaccines as a RTM product, which offered equivalent virological, immunological and pathological outcomes as compared to these vaccines when used by separate. BioMed Central 2020-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7197127/ /pubmed/32391165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00148-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sibila, M. Guevara, G. Cuadrado, R. Pleguezuelos, P. Pérez, D. Pérez de Rozas, A. Huerta, E. Llorens, A. Valero, O. Pérez, M. López, C. Krejci, R. Segalés, J. Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions |
title | Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions |
title_full | Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions |
title_short | Comparison of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions |
title_sort | comparison of mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2 commercial vaccines efficacy when applied separate or combined under experimental conditions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00148-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sibilam comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT guevarag comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT cuadrador comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT pleguezuelosp comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT perezd comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT perezderozasa comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT huertae comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT llorensa comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT valeroo comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT perezm comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT lopezc comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT krejcir comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions AT segalesj comparisonofmycoplasmahyopneumoniaeandporcinecircovirus2commercialvaccinesefficacywhenappliedseparateorcombinedunderexperimentalconditions |