Cargando…

The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion

The results of current wolf-dog studies on human-directed behaviors seem to suggest that domestication has acted on dogs’ general attitudes and not on specific socio-cognitive skills. A recent hypothesis suggests that domestication may have increased dogs’ overall sociability (hypersociability hypot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazzaroni, Martina, Range, Friederike, Backes, Jessica, Portele, Katrin, Scheck, Katharina, Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395114
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00785
_version_ 1783528851154927616
author Lazzaroni, Martina
Range, Friederike
Backes, Jessica
Portele, Katrin
Scheck, Katharina
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
author_facet Lazzaroni, Martina
Range, Friederike
Backes, Jessica
Portele, Katrin
Scheck, Katharina
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
author_sort Lazzaroni, Martina
collection PubMed
description The results of current wolf-dog studies on human-directed behaviors seem to suggest that domestication has acted on dogs’ general attitudes and not on specific socio-cognitive skills. A recent hypothesis suggests that domestication may have increased dogs’ overall sociability (hypersociability hypothesis). The aim of the present study was to test one aspect of the hypersociability hypothesis, whereby dogs should be more interested in social human contact compared to wolves, and to investigate the relative roles of both domestication and experience on the value that dogs attribute to human social contact. We compared equally raised wolves and dogs kept at the Wolf Science Center (WSCw, WSCd) but also dogs with different human socialization experiences i.e., pet dogs and free-ranging dogs. We presented subjects with a simple test, divided in two phases: in the Pre-test phase animals were exposed to two people in succession. One person invited the animal for a social/cuddle session (contact provider) and the other fed the animal (food provider). In the Test phase, animals could choose which of the two persons to approach, when both stood in a neutral posture. We directly compared WSCd with WSCw and free-ranging dogs with pet dogs. We found that in the Pre-test, WSCd and free-ranging dogs spent more time with the contact provider than WSCw and pet dogs, respectively. The results regarding the free-ranging dog and pet dog comparison were surprising, hence we conducted a follow-up testing pet dogs in a familiar, distraction-free area. Free-ranging dogs and this group of pet dogs did not differ in the time spent cuddling. In the test phase, WSCd were more likely than WSCw to approach the two experimenters. However, neither for the WSCd-WSCw comparison nor for the free-ranging dogs-pet dogs comparison, we could find a clear preference for one person over the other. Our findings support the idea that domestication has affected dogs’ behavior in terms of their overall interest in being in proximity with a human partner also in case of dogs with a relatively sparse socialization experience (free-ranging dogs). However, it remains unclear what the driving motivation to interact with the human may be.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7197371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71973712020-05-11 The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion Lazzaroni, Martina Range, Friederike Backes, Jessica Portele, Katrin Scheck, Katharina Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Front Psychol Psychology The results of current wolf-dog studies on human-directed behaviors seem to suggest that domestication has acted on dogs’ general attitudes and not on specific socio-cognitive skills. A recent hypothesis suggests that domestication may have increased dogs’ overall sociability (hypersociability hypothesis). The aim of the present study was to test one aspect of the hypersociability hypothesis, whereby dogs should be more interested in social human contact compared to wolves, and to investigate the relative roles of both domestication and experience on the value that dogs attribute to human social contact. We compared equally raised wolves and dogs kept at the Wolf Science Center (WSCw, WSCd) but also dogs with different human socialization experiences i.e., pet dogs and free-ranging dogs. We presented subjects with a simple test, divided in two phases: in the Pre-test phase animals were exposed to two people in succession. One person invited the animal for a social/cuddle session (contact provider) and the other fed the animal (food provider). In the Test phase, animals could choose which of the two persons to approach, when both stood in a neutral posture. We directly compared WSCd with WSCw and free-ranging dogs with pet dogs. We found that in the Pre-test, WSCd and free-ranging dogs spent more time with the contact provider than WSCw and pet dogs, respectively. The results regarding the free-ranging dog and pet dog comparison were surprising, hence we conducted a follow-up testing pet dogs in a familiar, distraction-free area. Free-ranging dogs and this group of pet dogs did not differ in the time spent cuddling. In the test phase, WSCd were more likely than WSCw to approach the two experimenters. However, neither for the WSCd-WSCw comparison nor for the free-ranging dogs-pet dogs comparison, we could find a clear preference for one person over the other. Our findings support the idea that domestication has affected dogs’ behavior in terms of their overall interest in being in proximity with a human partner also in case of dogs with a relatively sparse socialization experience (free-ranging dogs). However, it remains unclear what the driving motivation to interact with the human may be. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7197371/ /pubmed/32395114 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00785 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lazzaroni, Range, Backes, Portele, Scheck and Marshall-Pescini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lazzaroni, Martina
Range, Friederike
Backes, Jessica
Portele, Katrin
Scheck, Katharina
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion
title The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion
title_full The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion
title_fullStr The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion
title_short The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion
title_sort effect of domestication and experience on the social interaction of dogs and wolves with a human companion
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32395114
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00785
work_keys_str_mv AT lazzaronimartina theeffectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT rangefriederike theeffectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT backesjessica theeffectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT portelekatrin theeffectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT scheckkatharina theeffectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT marshallpescinisarah theeffectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT lazzaronimartina effectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT rangefriederike effectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT backesjessica effectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT portelekatrin effectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT scheckkatharina effectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion
AT marshallpescinisarah effectofdomesticationandexperienceonthesocialinteractionofdogsandwolveswithahumancompanion