Cargando…

Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records

Citizen science (CS) contributes to the knowledge about species distributions, which is a critical foundation in the studies of invasive species, biological conservation, and response to climatic change. In this study, we assessed the value of CS for termites worldwide. First, we compared the abunda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hochmair, Hartwig H., Scheffrahn, Rudolf H., Basille, Mathieu, Boone, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226534
_version_ 1783528882929926144
author Hochmair, Hartwig H.
Scheffrahn, Rudolf H.
Basille, Mathieu
Boone, Matthew
author_facet Hochmair, Hartwig H.
Scheffrahn, Rudolf H.
Basille, Mathieu
Boone, Matthew
author_sort Hochmair, Hartwig H.
collection PubMed
description Citizen science (CS) contributes to the knowledge about species distributions, which is a critical foundation in the studies of invasive species, biological conservation, and response to climatic change. In this study, we assessed the value of CS for termites worldwide. First, we compared the abundance and species diversity of geo-tagged termite records in iNaturalist to that of the University of Florida termite collection (UFTC) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Second, we quantified how the combination of these data sources affected the number of genera that satisfy data requirements for ecological niche modeling. Third, we assessed the taxonomic correctness of iNaturalist termite records in the Americas at the genus and family level through expert review based on photo identification. Results showed that iNaturalist records were less abundant than those in the UFTC and in GBIF, although they complemented the latter two in selected world regions. A combination of GBIF and the UFTC led to a significant increase in the number of termite genera satisfying the abundance criterion for niche modeling compared to either of those two sources alone, whereas adding iNaturalist observations as a third source only had a moderate effect on the number of termite genera satisfying that criterion. Although research grade observations in iNaturalist require a community-supported and agreed upon identification (ID) below the family taxonomic rank, our results indicated that iNaturalist data do not exhibit a higher taxonomic classification accuracy when they are designated research grade. This means that non-research grade observations can be used to more completely map the presence of termite locations in certain geographic locations without significantly jeopardizing data quality. We concluded that CS termite observation records can, to some extent, complement expert termite collections in terms of geographic coverage and species diversity. Based on recent data contribution patterns in CS data, the role of CS termite contributions is expected to grow significantly in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7197788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71977882020-05-12 Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records Hochmair, Hartwig H. Scheffrahn, Rudolf H. Basille, Mathieu Boone, Matthew PLoS One Research Article Citizen science (CS) contributes to the knowledge about species distributions, which is a critical foundation in the studies of invasive species, biological conservation, and response to climatic change. In this study, we assessed the value of CS for termites worldwide. First, we compared the abundance and species diversity of geo-tagged termite records in iNaturalist to that of the University of Florida termite collection (UFTC) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Second, we quantified how the combination of these data sources affected the number of genera that satisfy data requirements for ecological niche modeling. Third, we assessed the taxonomic correctness of iNaturalist termite records in the Americas at the genus and family level through expert review based on photo identification. Results showed that iNaturalist records were less abundant than those in the UFTC and in GBIF, although they complemented the latter two in selected world regions. A combination of GBIF and the UFTC led to a significant increase in the number of termite genera satisfying the abundance criterion for niche modeling compared to either of those two sources alone, whereas adding iNaturalist observations as a third source only had a moderate effect on the number of termite genera satisfying that criterion. Although research grade observations in iNaturalist require a community-supported and agreed upon identification (ID) below the family taxonomic rank, our results indicated that iNaturalist data do not exhibit a higher taxonomic classification accuracy when they are designated research grade. This means that non-research grade observations can be used to more completely map the presence of termite locations in certain geographic locations without significantly jeopardizing data quality. We concluded that CS termite observation records can, to some extent, complement expert termite collections in terms of geographic coverage and species diversity. Based on recent data contribution patterns in CS data, the role of CS termite contributions is expected to grow significantly in the near future. Public Library of Science 2020-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7197788/ /pubmed/32365126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226534 Text en © 2020 Hochmair et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hochmair, Hartwig H.
Scheffrahn, Rudolf H.
Basille, Mathieu
Boone, Matthew
Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records
title Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records
title_full Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records
title_fullStr Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records
title_short Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records
title_sort evaluating the data quality of inaturalist termite records
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226534
work_keys_str_mv AT hochmairhartwigh evaluatingthedataqualityofinaturalisttermiterecords
AT scheffrahnrudolfh evaluatingthedataqualityofinaturalisttermiterecords
AT basillemathieu evaluatingthedataqualityofinaturalisttermiterecords
AT boonematthew evaluatingthedataqualityofinaturalisttermiterecords