Cargando…
Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records
Citizen science (CS) contributes to the knowledge about species distributions, which is a critical foundation in the studies of invasive species, biological conservation, and response to climatic change. In this study, we assessed the value of CS for termites worldwide. First, we compared the abunda...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226534 |
_version_ | 1783528882929926144 |
---|---|
author | Hochmair, Hartwig H. Scheffrahn, Rudolf H. Basille, Mathieu Boone, Matthew |
author_facet | Hochmair, Hartwig H. Scheffrahn, Rudolf H. Basille, Mathieu Boone, Matthew |
author_sort | Hochmair, Hartwig H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Citizen science (CS) contributes to the knowledge about species distributions, which is a critical foundation in the studies of invasive species, biological conservation, and response to climatic change. In this study, we assessed the value of CS for termites worldwide. First, we compared the abundance and species diversity of geo-tagged termite records in iNaturalist to that of the University of Florida termite collection (UFTC) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Second, we quantified how the combination of these data sources affected the number of genera that satisfy data requirements for ecological niche modeling. Third, we assessed the taxonomic correctness of iNaturalist termite records in the Americas at the genus and family level through expert review based on photo identification. Results showed that iNaturalist records were less abundant than those in the UFTC and in GBIF, although they complemented the latter two in selected world regions. A combination of GBIF and the UFTC led to a significant increase in the number of termite genera satisfying the abundance criterion for niche modeling compared to either of those two sources alone, whereas adding iNaturalist observations as a third source only had a moderate effect on the number of termite genera satisfying that criterion. Although research grade observations in iNaturalist require a community-supported and agreed upon identification (ID) below the family taxonomic rank, our results indicated that iNaturalist data do not exhibit a higher taxonomic classification accuracy when they are designated research grade. This means that non-research grade observations can be used to more completely map the presence of termite locations in certain geographic locations without significantly jeopardizing data quality. We concluded that CS termite observation records can, to some extent, complement expert termite collections in terms of geographic coverage and species diversity. Based on recent data contribution patterns in CS data, the role of CS termite contributions is expected to grow significantly in the near future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7197788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71977882020-05-12 Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records Hochmair, Hartwig H. Scheffrahn, Rudolf H. Basille, Mathieu Boone, Matthew PLoS One Research Article Citizen science (CS) contributes to the knowledge about species distributions, which is a critical foundation in the studies of invasive species, biological conservation, and response to climatic change. In this study, we assessed the value of CS for termites worldwide. First, we compared the abundance and species diversity of geo-tagged termite records in iNaturalist to that of the University of Florida termite collection (UFTC) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Second, we quantified how the combination of these data sources affected the number of genera that satisfy data requirements for ecological niche modeling. Third, we assessed the taxonomic correctness of iNaturalist termite records in the Americas at the genus and family level through expert review based on photo identification. Results showed that iNaturalist records were less abundant than those in the UFTC and in GBIF, although they complemented the latter two in selected world regions. A combination of GBIF and the UFTC led to a significant increase in the number of termite genera satisfying the abundance criterion for niche modeling compared to either of those two sources alone, whereas adding iNaturalist observations as a third source only had a moderate effect on the number of termite genera satisfying that criterion. Although research grade observations in iNaturalist require a community-supported and agreed upon identification (ID) below the family taxonomic rank, our results indicated that iNaturalist data do not exhibit a higher taxonomic classification accuracy when they are designated research grade. This means that non-research grade observations can be used to more completely map the presence of termite locations in certain geographic locations without significantly jeopardizing data quality. We concluded that CS termite observation records can, to some extent, complement expert termite collections in terms of geographic coverage and species diversity. Based on recent data contribution patterns in CS data, the role of CS termite contributions is expected to grow significantly in the near future. Public Library of Science 2020-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7197788/ /pubmed/32365126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226534 Text en © 2020 Hochmair et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hochmair, Hartwig H. Scheffrahn, Rudolf H. Basille, Mathieu Boone, Matthew Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records |
title | Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records |
title_full | Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records |
title_short | Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records |
title_sort | evaluating the data quality of inaturalist termite records |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7197788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hochmairhartwigh evaluatingthedataqualityofinaturalisttermiterecords AT scheffrahnrudolfh evaluatingthedataqualityofinaturalisttermiterecords AT basillemathieu evaluatingthedataqualityofinaturalisttermiterecords AT boonematthew evaluatingthedataqualityofinaturalisttermiterecords |