Cargando…

Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function

BACKGROUND: The cerebellum strongly contributes to vestibulospinal function, and the modulation of vestibulospinal function is important for rehabilitation. As transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation may induce functional changes in neural systems, we investigated whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsugi, Akiyoshi, Douchi, Shinya, Hasada, Rikiya, Mori, Nobuhiko, Okada, Yohei, Yoshida, Naoki, Nishishita, Satoru, Hosomi, Koichi, Saitoh, Youichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7198759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00388
_version_ 1783529050920189952
author Matsugi, Akiyoshi
Douchi, Shinya
Hasada, Rikiya
Mori, Nobuhiko
Okada, Yohei
Yoshida, Naoki
Nishishita, Satoru
Hosomi, Koichi
Saitoh, Youichi
author_facet Matsugi, Akiyoshi
Douchi, Shinya
Hasada, Rikiya
Mori, Nobuhiko
Okada, Yohei
Yoshida, Naoki
Nishishita, Satoru
Hosomi, Koichi
Saitoh, Youichi
author_sort Matsugi, Akiyoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cerebellum strongly contributes to vestibulospinal function, and the modulation of vestibulospinal function is important for rehabilitation. As transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation may induce functional changes in neural systems, we investigated whether cerebellar repetitive TMS (crTMS) and noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) could modulate vestibulospinal response excitability. We also sought to determine whether crTMS could influence the effect of nGVS. METHODS: Fifty-nine healthy adults were recruited; 28 were randomly allocated to a real-crTMS group and 31 to a sham-crTMS group. The crTMS was conducted using 900 pulses at 1 Hz, while the participants were in a static position. After the crTMS, each participant was allocated to either a real-nGVS group or sham-nGVS group, and nGVS was delivered (15 min., 1 mA; 0.1–640 Hz) while patients were in a static position. The H-reflex ratio (with/without bilateral bipolar square wave pulse GVS), which reflects vestibulospinal excitability, was measured at pre-crTMS, post-crTMS, and post-nGVS. RESULTS: We found that crTMS alone and nGVS alone have no effect on H-reflex ratio but that the effect of nGVS was obtained after crTMS. CONCLUSION: crTMS and nGVS appear to act as neuromodulators of vestibulospinal function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7198759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71987592020-05-14 Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function Matsugi, Akiyoshi Douchi, Shinya Hasada, Rikiya Mori, Nobuhiko Okada, Yohei Yoshida, Naoki Nishishita, Satoru Hosomi, Koichi Saitoh, Youichi Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: The cerebellum strongly contributes to vestibulospinal function, and the modulation of vestibulospinal function is important for rehabilitation. As transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation may induce functional changes in neural systems, we investigated whether cerebellar repetitive TMS (crTMS) and noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) could modulate vestibulospinal response excitability. We also sought to determine whether crTMS could influence the effect of nGVS. METHODS: Fifty-nine healthy adults were recruited; 28 were randomly allocated to a real-crTMS group and 31 to a sham-crTMS group. The crTMS was conducted using 900 pulses at 1 Hz, while the participants were in a static position. After the crTMS, each participant was allocated to either a real-nGVS group or sham-nGVS group, and nGVS was delivered (15 min., 1 mA; 0.1–640 Hz) while patients were in a static position. The H-reflex ratio (with/without bilateral bipolar square wave pulse GVS), which reflects vestibulospinal excitability, was measured at pre-crTMS, post-crTMS, and post-nGVS. RESULTS: We found that crTMS alone and nGVS alone have no effect on H-reflex ratio but that the effect of nGVS was obtained after crTMS. CONCLUSION: crTMS and nGVS appear to act as neuromodulators of vestibulospinal function. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7198759/ /pubmed/32410952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00388 Text en Copyright © 2020 Matsugi, Douchi, Hasada, Mori, Okada, Yoshida, Nishishita, Hosomi and Saitoh. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Matsugi, Akiyoshi
Douchi, Shinya
Hasada, Rikiya
Mori, Nobuhiko
Okada, Yohei
Yoshida, Naoki
Nishishita, Satoru
Hosomi, Koichi
Saitoh, Youichi
Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function
title Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function
title_full Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function
title_fullStr Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function
title_full_unstemmed Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function
title_short Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function
title_sort cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation change vestibulospinal function
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7198759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00388
work_keys_str_mv AT matsugiakiyoshi cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction
AT douchishinya cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction
AT hasadarikiya cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction
AT morinobuhiko cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction
AT okadayohei cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction
AT yoshidanaoki cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction
AT nishishitasatoru cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction
AT hosomikoichi cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction
AT saitohyouichi cerebellarrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationandnoisygalvanicvestibularstimulationchangevestibulospinalfunction