Cargando…

Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size

INTRODUCTION: Recent developments regarding cochlear implant magnets (e.g., a bipolar diametral magnet) and refined surgical techniques (e.g., implant positioning) have had a significant impact on the relation between cochlear implants and MRIs, making the reproducible visibility of cochlea and IAC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Todt, I., Guerkov, R., Gehl, H. B., Sudhoff, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5086291
_version_ 1783529178129235968
author Todt, I.
Guerkov, R.
Gehl, H. B.
Sudhoff, H.
author_facet Todt, I.
Guerkov, R.
Gehl, H. B.
Sudhoff, H.
author_sort Todt, I.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent developments regarding cochlear implant magnets (e.g., a bipolar diametral magnet) and refined surgical techniques (e.g., implant positioning) have had a significant impact on the relation between cochlear implants and MRIs, making the reproducible visibility of cochlea and IAC possible. MRI scanning has changed from a contraindication to a diagnostic tool. Magnet artifact size plays a central role in the visual assessment of the cochlea and IAC. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the CI magnet-related maximum artifact sizes of various cochlea implant systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an in vivo measurement of MRI artifacts at 1.5 and 3 Tesla with three cochlear implant magnet systems (AB 3D, Medel Synchrony, and Oticon ZTI). The implant, including the magnet, was positioned with a head bandage 7.0 cm and 120° from the nasion, external auditory canal. We used a TSE T2w MRI sequence on the axial and coronal plains and compared the artifacts in two volunteers for each tesla strength. RESULTS: Intraindividual artifact size differences between the three magnets are smaller than interindividual maximum artifact size differences. 3 T MRI scans, in comparison to 1.5 T MRI scans, show a difference between soft artifact areas. CONCLUSION: We observed no major difference between maximum implant magnet artifact sizes of the three implant magnet types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7199598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71995982020-05-15 Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size Todt, I. Guerkov, R. Gehl, H. B. Sudhoff, H. Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: Recent developments regarding cochlear implant magnets (e.g., a bipolar diametral magnet) and refined surgical techniques (e.g., implant positioning) have had a significant impact on the relation between cochlear implants and MRIs, making the reproducible visibility of cochlea and IAC possible. MRI scanning has changed from a contraindication to a diagnostic tool. Magnet artifact size plays a central role in the visual assessment of the cochlea and IAC. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the CI magnet-related maximum artifact sizes of various cochlea implant systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an in vivo measurement of MRI artifacts at 1.5 and 3 Tesla with three cochlear implant magnet systems (AB 3D, Medel Synchrony, and Oticon ZTI). The implant, including the magnet, was positioned with a head bandage 7.0 cm and 120° from the nasion, external auditory canal. We used a TSE T2w MRI sequence on the axial and coronal plains and compared the artifacts in two volunteers for each tesla strength. RESULTS: Intraindividual artifact size differences between the three magnets are smaller than interindividual maximum artifact size differences. 3 T MRI scans, in comparison to 1.5 T MRI scans, show a difference between soft artifact areas. CONCLUSION: We observed no major difference between maximum implant magnet artifact sizes of the three implant magnet types. Hindawi 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7199598/ /pubmed/32420348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5086291 Text en Copyright © 2020 I. Todt et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Todt, I.
Guerkov, R.
Gehl, H. B.
Sudhoff, H.
Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size
title Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size
title_full Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size
title_fullStr Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size
title_short Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size
title_sort comparison of cochlear implant magnets and their mri artifact size
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5086291
work_keys_str_mv AT todti comparisonofcochlearimplantmagnetsandtheirmriartifactsize
AT guerkovr comparisonofcochlearimplantmagnetsandtheirmriartifactsize
AT gehlhb comparisonofcochlearimplantmagnetsandtheirmriartifactsize
AT sudhoffh comparisonofcochlearimplantmagnetsandtheirmriartifactsize