Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Single-Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single Institution Experience

OBJECTIVES: Single-incision laparoscopic procedures have been gaining popularity in recent years due to their minimal incisional morbidity and improved cosmetic outcomes. Herein, we will compare the feasibility and outcomes of single-incision and conventional multiport laparoscopic distal pancreatec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ağcaoğlu, Orhan, Aksakal, Nihat, Azamat, İbrahim Fethi, Doğan, Selim, Mercan, Selçuk, Barbaros, Umut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32377068
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2019.37880
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Single-incision laparoscopic procedures have been gaining popularity in recent years due to their minimal incisional morbidity and improved cosmetic outcomes. Herein, we will compare the feasibility and outcomes of single-incision and conventional multiport laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: This study involves consecutive patients who underwent either single-incision or conventional multiport laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy from March 2007 to February 2014. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the surgical approach: single-incision laparoscopic surgery (Group 1) and conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (Group 2). The parameters evaluated included estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay, complications, conversion, and final pathology. RESULTS: There were a total of 20 patients, 10 in each study group. Baseline characteristics were similar, and there was no mortality in either of the groups. The low-flow pancreatic fistula was the most commonly seen morbidity, but it was ceased spontaneously in each group by a ratio of 30%. The operative time was significantly shorter in Group 2, with a mean of 116 minutes versus a mean of 180 minutes for Group 1 (p<0.001). One of the procedures in Group 2 was converted to open surgery due to peroperative bleeding. The median follow-up periods of the patients were 22 months and 56 months. The spleen was preserved in only 1 patient from Group 1, whereas in Group 2, the spleen preservation was achieved in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: The single-incision laparoscopic technique is a safe and effective alternative to standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.