Cargando…

Institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Prompt sepsis treatment is associated with improved outcomes but requires a complex series of actions by multiple clinicians. We investigated whether simply reorganizing emergency department (ED) care to expedite patients’ initial evaluation was associated with shorter sepsis door-to-ant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peltan, Ithan D., Bledsoe, Joseph R., Brems, David, McLean, Sierra, Murnin, Emily, Brown, Samuel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232794
_version_ 1783529240371658752
author Peltan, Ithan D.
Bledsoe, Joseph R.
Brems, David
McLean, Sierra
Murnin, Emily
Brown, Samuel M.
author_facet Peltan, Ithan D.
Bledsoe, Joseph R.
Brems, David
McLean, Sierra
Murnin, Emily
Brown, Samuel M.
author_sort Peltan, Ithan D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prompt sepsis treatment is associated with improved outcomes but requires a complex series of actions by multiple clinicians. We investigated whether simply reorganizing emergency department (ED) care to expedite patients’ initial evaluation was associated with shorter sepsis door-to-antibiotic times. METHODS: Patients eligible for this retrospective study received IV antibiotics and demonstrated acute organ failure after presenting to one of three EDs in Utah. On May 1, 2016, the intervention ED instituted “swarming” as the default model for initial evaluation of all mid- and low-acuity patients. Swarming involved simultaneous patient evaluation by the ED physician, nurse, and technician followed by a team discussion of the initial care plan. Care was unchanged at the two control EDs. A 30-day wash-in period separated the baseline (May 16, 2015 to April 15, 2016) and post-intervention (May 16, 2016 to November 15, 2016) analysis periods. We conducted a quasi-experimental analysis comparing door-to-antibiotic time for sepsis patients at the intervention ED after versus before care reorganization, applying difference-in-differences methods to control for trends in door-to-antibiotic time unrelated to the studied intervention and multivariable regression to adjust for patient characteristics. RESULTS: The analysis included 3,230 ED sepsis patients, including 1,406 from the intervention ED. Adjusted analyses using difference-in-differences methods to control for temporal trends unrelated to the studied intervention revealed no significant change in door-to-antibiotic time after care reorganization (-7 minutes, 95% CI -20 to 6 minutes, p = 0.29). Multivariable pre/post analyses using data only from the intervention ED overestimated the magnitude and statistical significance of outcome changes associated with ED care reorganization. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ED care model involving parallel multidisciplinary assessment and early team discussion of the care plan was not associated with improvements in mid- and low-acuity sepsis patients’ door-to-antibiotic time after accounting for changes in the outcome unrelated to the studied intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7199941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71999412020-05-12 Institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis Peltan, Ithan D. Bledsoe, Joseph R. Brems, David McLean, Sierra Murnin, Emily Brown, Samuel M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Prompt sepsis treatment is associated with improved outcomes but requires a complex series of actions by multiple clinicians. We investigated whether simply reorganizing emergency department (ED) care to expedite patients’ initial evaluation was associated with shorter sepsis door-to-antibiotic times. METHODS: Patients eligible for this retrospective study received IV antibiotics and demonstrated acute organ failure after presenting to one of three EDs in Utah. On May 1, 2016, the intervention ED instituted “swarming” as the default model for initial evaluation of all mid- and low-acuity patients. Swarming involved simultaneous patient evaluation by the ED physician, nurse, and technician followed by a team discussion of the initial care plan. Care was unchanged at the two control EDs. A 30-day wash-in period separated the baseline (May 16, 2015 to April 15, 2016) and post-intervention (May 16, 2016 to November 15, 2016) analysis periods. We conducted a quasi-experimental analysis comparing door-to-antibiotic time for sepsis patients at the intervention ED after versus before care reorganization, applying difference-in-differences methods to control for trends in door-to-antibiotic time unrelated to the studied intervention and multivariable regression to adjust for patient characteristics. RESULTS: The analysis included 3,230 ED sepsis patients, including 1,406 from the intervention ED. Adjusted analyses using difference-in-differences methods to control for temporal trends unrelated to the studied intervention revealed no significant change in door-to-antibiotic time after care reorganization (-7 minutes, 95% CI -20 to 6 minutes, p = 0.29). Multivariable pre/post analyses using data only from the intervention ED overestimated the magnitude and statistical significance of outcome changes associated with ED care reorganization. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ED care model involving parallel multidisciplinary assessment and early team discussion of the care plan was not associated with improvements in mid- and low-acuity sepsis patients’ door-to-antibiotic time after accounting for changes in the outcome unrelated to the studied intervention. Public Library of Science 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7199941/ /pubmed/32369531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232794 Text en © 2020 Peltan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peltan, Ithan D.
Bledsoe, Joseph R.
Brems, David
McLean, Sierra
Murnin, Emily
Brown, Samuel M.
Institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis
title Institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis
title_full Institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis
title_short Institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis
title_sort institution of an emergency department “swarming” care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: a quasi-experimental retrospective analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232794
work_keys_str_mv AT peltanithand institutionofanemergencydepartmentswarmingcaremodelandsepsisdoortoantibiotictimeaquasiexperimentalretrospectiveanalysis
AT bledsoejosephr institutionofanemergencydepartmentswarmingcaremodelandsepsisdoortoantibiotictimeaquasiexperimentalretrospectiveanalysis
AT bremsdavid institutionofanemergencydepartmentswarmingcaremodelandsepsisdoortoantibiotictimeaquasiexperimentalretrospectiveanalysis
AT mcleansierra institutionofanemergencydepartmentswarmingcaremodelandsepsisdoortoantibiotictimeaquasiexperimentalretrospectiveanalysis
AT murninemily institutionofanemergencydepartmentswarmingcaremodelandsepsisdoortoantibiotictimeaquasiexperimentalretrospectiveanalysis
AT brownsamuelm institutionofanemergencydepartmentswarmingcaremodelandsepsisdoortoantibiotictimeaquasiexperimentalretrospectiveanalysis