Cargando…
Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study
OBJECTIVE: There are controversial opinions on anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients with liver failure (LF) and increased bleeding risk. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232516 |
_version_ | 1783529243478589440 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Yan Bai, Ming Ma, Feng Zhang, Wei Li, Yangping Zhao, Lijuan Li, Li Zhou, Meilan Li, Lu Sun, Shiren |
author_facet | Yu, Yan Bai, Ming Ma, Feng Zhang, Wei Li, Yangping Zhao, Lijuan Li, Li Zhou, Meilan Li, Lu Sun, Shiren |
author_sort | Yu, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There are controversial opinions on anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients with liver failure (LF) and increased bleeding risk. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) versus no-anticoagulation for CVVH in these patients. METHODS: The included patients were divided into RCA and no-anticoagulation group according to the CVVH anticoagulation strategy they accepted for CVVH. Filter lifespan, bleeding, citrate accumulation, catheter occlusion, and totCa/ionCa ratio were evaluated as outcomes. RESULTS: In the original cohort, the filter lifespan of the RCA group (41 patients, 79 filters) was significantly longer than the no-anticoagulation group (62 patients, 162 filters) (> 72 hours vs 39.5 hours (IQR 31.2–47.8), P = 0.002). The adjusted results demonstrated that RCA could significantly reduce the risk of filter failure (HR = 0.459, 95%CI 0.26–0.82, P = 0.008). Four episodes of totCa/ionCa > 2.5 were observed in the RCA group and continuously accepted RCA-CVVH after the reduction of citrate dose and blood flow. No obvious citrate accumulation was observed in these patients. In the matched cohort, the filter lifespan of the RCA group was significantly longer than the no-anticoagulation group (P = 0.013) as well. No significant difference in the episodes of totCa/ionCa > 2.5 was observed between the two matched groups (P = 0.074). Both in the original cohort and the matched cohort, the bleeding, acidosis, alkalosis, and catheter occlusion incidences were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In LF patients with increased bleeding risk who underwent CVVH, RCA could prolong the filter lifespan and be safely used with careful blood gas monitoring and citrate dose adjusting. Further prospective, randomized, control studies are warranted to obtain robust evidences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7199954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71999542020-05-12 Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study Yu, Yan Bai, Ming Ma, Feng Zhang, Wei Li, Yangping Zhao, Lijuan Li, Li Zhou, Meilan Li, Lu Sun, Shiren PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: There are controversial opinions on anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients with liver failure (LF) and increased bleeding risk. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) versus no-anticoagulation for CVVH in these patients. METHODS: The included patients were divided into RCA and no-anticoagulation group according to the CVVH anticoagulation strategy they accepted for CVVH. Filter lifespan, bleeding, citrate accumulation, catheter occlusion, and totCa/ionCa ratio were evaluated as outcomes. RESULTS: In the original cohort, the filter lifespan of the RCA group (41 patients, 79 filters) was significantly longer than the no-anticoagulation group (62 patients, 162 filters) (> 72 hours vs 39.5 hours (IQR 31.2–47.8), P = 0.002). The adjusted results demonstrated that RCA could significantly reduce the risk of filter failure (HR = 0.459, 95%CI 0.26–0.82, P = 0.008). Four episodes of totCa/ionCa > 2.5 were observed in the RCA group and continuously accepted RCA-CVVH after the reduction of citrate dose and blood flow. No obvious citrate accumulation was observed in these patients. In the matched cohort, the filter lifespan of the RCA group was significantly longer than the no-anticoagulation group (P = 0.013) as well. No significant difference in the episodes of totCa/ionCa > 2.5 was observed between the two matched groups (P = 0.074). Both in the original cohort and the matched cohort, the bleeding, acidosis, alkalosis, and catheter occlusion incidences were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In LF patients with increased bleeding risk who underwent CVVH, RCA could prolong the filter lifespan and be safely used with careful blood gas monitoring and citrate dose adjusting. Further prospective, randomized, control studies are warranted to obtain robust evidences. Public Library of Science 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7199954/ /pubmed/32369523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232516 Text en © 2020 Yu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yu, Yan Bai, Ming Ma, Feng Zhang, Wei Li, Yangping Zhao, Lijuan Li, Li Zhou, Meilan Li, Lu Sun, Shiren Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study |
title | Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study |
title_full | Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study |
title_fullStr | Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study |
title_short | Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study |
title_sort | regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: a retrospective case-control study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuyan regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT baiming regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT mafeng regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT zhangwei regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT liyangping regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT zhaolijuan regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT lili regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT zhoumeilan regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT lilu regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT sunshiren regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy |