Cargando…

Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE: There are controversial opinions on anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients with liver failure (LF) and increased bleeding risk. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Yan, Bai, Ming, Ma, Feng, Zhang, Wei, Li, Yangping, Zhao, Lijuan, Li, Li, Zhou, Meilan, Li, Lu, Sun, Shiren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232516
_version_ 1783529243478589440
author Yu, Yan
Bai, Ming
Ma, Feng
Zhang, Wei
Li, Yangping
Zhao, Lijuan
Li, Li
Zhou, Meilan
Li, Lu
Sun, Shiren
author_facet Yu, Yan
Bai, Ming
Ma, Feng
Zhang, Wei
Li, Yangping
Zhao, Lijuan
Li, Li
Zhou, Meilan
Li, Lu
Sun, Shiren
author_sort Yu, Yan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There are controversial opinions on anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients with liver failure (LF) and increased bleeding risk. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) versus no-anticoagulation for CVVH in these patients. METHODS: The included patients were divided into RCA and no-anticoagulation group according to the CVVH anticoagulation strategy they accepted for CVVH. Filter lifespan, bleeding, citrate accumulation, catheter occlusion, and totCa/ionCa ratio were evaluated as outcomes. RESULTS: In the original cohort, the filter lifespan of the RCA group (41 patients, 79 filters) was significantly longer than the no-anticoagulation group (62 patients, 162 filters) (> 72 hours vs 39.5 hours (IQR 31.2–47.8), P = 0.002). The adjusted results demonstrated that RCA could significantly reduce the risk of filter failure (HR = 0.459, 95%CI 0.26–0.82, P = 0.008). Four episodes of totCa/ionCa > 2.5 were observed in the RCA group and continuously accepted RCA-CVVH after the reduction of citrate dose and blood flow. No obvious citrate accumulation was observed in these patients. In the matched cohort, the filter lifespan of the RCA group was significantly longer than the no-anticoagulation group (P = 0.013) as well. No significant difference in the episodes of totCa/ionCa > 2.5 was observed between the two matched groups (P = 0.074). Both in the original cohort and the matched cohort, the bleeding, acidosis, alkalosis, and catheter occlusion incidences were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In LF patients with increased bleeding risk who underwent CVVH, RCA could prolong the filter lifespan and be safely used with careful blood gas monitoring and citrate dose adjusting. Further prospective, randomized, control studies are warranted to obtain robust evidences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7199954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71999542020-05-12 Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study Yu, Yan Bai, Ming Ma, Feng Zhang, Wei Li, Yangping Zhao, Lijuan Li, Li Zhou, Meilan Li, Lu Sun, Shiren PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: There are controversial opinions on anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients with liver failure (LF) and increased bleeding risk. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) versus no-anticoagulation for CVVH in these patients. METHODS: The included patients were divided into RCA and no-anticoagulation group according to the CVVH anticoagulation strategy they accepted for CVVH. Filter lifespan, bleeding, citrate accumulation, catheter occlusion, and totCa/ionCa ratio were evaluated as outcomes. RESULTS: In the original cohort, the filter lifespan of the RCA group (41 patients, 79 filters) was significantly longer than the no-anticoagulation group (62 patients, 162 filters) (> 72 hours vs 39.5 hours (IQR 31.2–47.8), P = 0.002). The adjusted results demonstrated that RCA could significantly reduce the risk of filter failure (HR = 0.459, 95%CI 0.26–0.82, P = 0.008). Four episodes of totCa/ionCa > 2.5 were observed in the RCA group and continuously accepted RCA-CVVH after the reduction of citrate dose and blood flow. No obvious citrate accumulation was observed in these patients. In the matched cohort, the filter lifespan of the RCA group was significantly longer than the no-anticoagulation group (P = 0.013) as well. No significant difference in the episodes of totCa/ionCa > 2.5 was observed between the two matched groups (P = 0.074). Both in the original cohort and the matched cohort, the bleeding, acidosis, alkalosis, and catheter occlusion incidences were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In LF patients with increased bleeding risk who underwent CVVH, RCA could prolong the filter lifespan and be safely used with careful blood gas monitoring and citrate dose adjusting. Further prospective, randomized, control studies are warranted to obtain robust evidences. Public Library of Science 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7199954/ /pubmed/32369523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232516 Text en © 2020 Yu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Yan
Bai, Ming
Ma, Feng
Zhang, Wei
Li, Yangping
Zhao, Lijuan
Li, Li
Zhou, Meilan
Li, Lu
Sun, Shiren
Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study
title Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study
title_full Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study
title_fullStr Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study
title_short Regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: A retrospective case-control study
title_sort regional citrate anticoagulation versus no-anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with liver failure and increased bleeding risk: a retrospective case-control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232516
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyan regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT baiming regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT mafeng regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT zhangwei regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT liyangping regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT zhaolijuan regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT lili regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT zhoumeilan regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT lilu regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT sunshiren regionalcitrateanticoagulationversusnoanticoagulationforcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationinpatientswithliverfailureandincreasedbleedingriskaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy